Active Python versions

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tom Del Rosso

    #1

    Active Python versions

    Why is the Windows msi install file for ActivePython-2.4.3.12 only 15MB
    whereas the older msi file for ActivePython-2.4.2.10 was 19MB?

    BTW, is that the prefered Python environment?


    --

    Reply in group, but if emailing add another
    zero, and remove the last word.


  • Trent Mick

    #2
    Re: Active Python versions

    Tom Del Rosso wrote:[color=blue]
    > Why is the Windows msi install file for ActivePython-2.4.3.12 only 15MB
    > whereas the older msi file for ActivePython-2.4.2.10 was 19MB?
    >
    > BTW, is that the prefered Python environment?[/color]

    Are you sure you are comparing the right packages? By my count:

    ActivePython-2.4.2.10-win32-x86.msi 19,053 KB
    ActivePython-2.4.3.12-win32-x86.msi 19,237 KB

    Note that the Windows *64-bit* builds are smaller (around 15MB) because
    they do not include PyWin32.

    Trent

    --
    Trent Mick
    trentm@activest ate.com

    Comment

    • Tom Del Rosso

      #3
      Re: Active Python versions

      Trent Mick <trentm@actives tate.com> typed
      in news://mailman.7218.1150748874.27775...ist@python.org,
      [color=blue]
      > Tom Del Rosso wrote:[color=green]
      >> Why is the Windows msi install file for ActivePython-2.4.3.12 only
      >> 15MB whereas the older msi file for ActivePython-2.4.2.10 was 19MB?
      >>
      >> BTW, is that the prefered Python environment?[/color]
      >
      > Are you sure you are comparing the right packages? By my count:
      >
      > ActivePython-2.4.2.10-win32-x86.msi 19,053 KB
      > ActivePython-2.4.3.12-win32-x86.msi 19,237 KB
      >
      > Note that the Windows *64-bit* builds are smaller (around 15MB)
      > because they do not include PyWin32.[/color]

      Thanks. I didn't notice the file name was wrong until I tried to install
      it.

      Can I ask you about alternative environments? How do Active Python and IDLE
      from python.org compare? I'm just starting out with it and I know they run
      the same code but I don't want to have to change environments later.


      --

      Reply in group, but if emailing add another
      zero, and remove the last word.


      Comment

      • Trent Mick

        #4
        Re: Active Python versions

        Tom Del Rosso wrote:[color=blue]
        > Can I ask you about alternative environments? How do Active Python and IDLE
        > from python.org compare?[/color]

        Both ActivePython and the Python installers from python.org install
        IDLE. They should not differ at all (AFAIK).

        Trent

        --
        Trent Mick
        trentm@activest ate.com

        Comment

        • jmdeschamps@gmail.com

          #5
          Re: Active Python versions


          Trent Mick wrote:[color=blue]
          > Tom Del Rosso wrote:[color=green]
          > > Can I ask you about alternative environments? How do Active Python and IDLE
          > > from python.org compare?[/color]
          >
          > Both ActivePython and the Python installers from python.org install
          > IDLE. They should not differ at all (AFAIK).
          >
          > Trent
          >
          > --
          > Trent Mick
          > trentm@activest ate.com[/color]

          Maybe the OP is refering to PythonWin editor (as compared to IDLE)
          which is in ActiveState's release but not in the Python.org release...
          makes for a very different subject, and hopefully for very different
          answer direction.

          jean-marc

          Comment

          • Tom Del Rosso

            #6
            Re: Active Python versions

            jmdeschamps@gma il.com <jmdeschamps@gm ail.com> typed
            in news://1150769349.111390.280450@y41g...oglegroups.com,
            [color=blue]
            > Maybe the OP is refering to PythonWin editor (as compared to IDLE)
            > which is in ActiveState's release but not in the Python.org release...
            > makes for a very different subject, and hopefully for very different
            > answer direction.[/color]

            Yes. I just wanted to know which programming environment is prefered by
            regular users, maybe even one that I haven't heard of yet.


            --

            Reply in group, but if emailing add another
            zero, and remove the last word.


            Comment

            • jmdeschamps@gmail.com

              #7
              Re: Active Python versions


              Tom Del Rosso wrote:[color=blue]
              > jmdeschamps@gma il.com <jmdeschamps@gm ail.com> typed
              > in news://1150769349.111390.280450@y41g...oglegroups.com,
              >[color=green]
              > > Maybe the OP is refering to PythonWin editor (as compared to IDLE)
              > > which is in ActiveState's release but not in the Python.org release...
              > > makes for a very different subject, and hopefully for very different
              > > answer direction.[/color]
              >
              > Yes. I just wanted to know which programming environment is prefered by
              > regular users, maybe even one that I haven't heard of yet.
              >[/color]
              .... try reading this very recent (still active) thread:


              My two-grain of salt:
              PythonWin is simple and nice BUT breaks if you do Tkinter Gui (and try
              to run a program while the previous run isn't finished)
              Python Scripter - light, nice, some nice features but missing code
              folding, if you like that...
              Pydev + Eclipse (Eclipse is Java based plugin type environment) lots of
              stuff (to much for some) and heavy [t's Java after all ;-) ] But
              nowadays with RAM, and processor speed - it's nice to do almost every
              task in the same basic environment (plugins for almost anything)

              BTW Kudos to all the people behind these apps (mark hammond of pywin
              fame, kiriakos vlahos for python scripter , and fabio zadrozny for
              pydev)

              jean-marc

              Comment

              • Trent Mick

                #8
                Re: Active Python versions

                Tom Del Rosso wrote:[color=blue]
                > jmdeschamps@gma il.com <jmdeschamps@gm ail.com> typed
                > in news://1150769349.111390.280450@y41g...oglegroups.com,
                >[color=green]
                >> Maybe the OP is refering to PythonWin editor (as compared to IDLE)
                >> which is in ActiveState's release but not in the Python.org release...
                >> makes for a very different subject, and hopefully for very different
                >> answer direction.[/color]
                >
                > Yes. I just wanted to know which programming environment is prefered by
                > regular users, maybe even one that I haven't heard of yet.[/color]

                Ah, the PythonWin IDE/Editor is part of PyWin32 -- which is included as
                a standard part of ActivePython. IDLE is also included in ActivePython,
                BTW. ActivePython just doesn't setup a shortcut in the Start Menu for
                it. You could add your own.

                As jean-marc suggests, you might want to search the python-list archives
                for peoples opinions on Python IDEs and editors. Also check out:




                ActiveState has a Python IDE called Komodo
                http://www.activestate.com/Products/Komodo/
                which I work on (so I'm biased :).

                Trent

                --
                Trent Mick
                trentm@activest ate.com

                Comment

                • Tom Del Rosso

                  #9
                  Re: Active Python versions

                  Thanks very much guys.


                  --

                  Reply in group, but if emailing add another
                  zero, and remove the last word.


                  Comment

                  Working...