making 'utf-8' default codec

[Nikola Skoric]

Hi there,

Is there a way of making 'utf-8' default codec for the whole program, so
I don't have to do .encode('utf-8') every time I print out a string?

--
"Now the storm has passed over me
I'm left to drift on a dead calm sea
And watch her forever through the cracks in the beams
Nailed across the doorways of the bedrooms of my dreams"

[Jarek Zgoda]

Re: making 'utf-8' default codec

Nikola Skoric napisa³(a):
[color=blue]
> Is there a way of making 'utf-8' default codec for the whole program, so
> I don't have to do .encode('utf-8') every time I print out a string?[/color]

Bad idea. You may accidentally break some libraries that depend on ASCII
being default & standard.

--
Jarek Zgoda

http://jpa.berlios.de/

[Scott David Daniels]

Re: making 'utf-8' default codec

Nikola Skoric wrote:[color=blue]
> Is there a way of making 'utf-8' default codec for the whole program, so
> I don't have to do .encode('utf-8') every time I print out a string?[/color]

Explicit is better than implicit (so setting up a default codec is
considered bad practice). However, you could wrap an output destination
with an encoder and get the effect you want.

import sys, codecs
sys.stdout, _held = (codecs.getwrit er('utf-8')(sys.stdout) ,
sys.stdout)

--Scott David Daniels
scott.daniels@a cm.org

[Jorge Godoy]

Re: making 'utf-8' default codec

Jarek Zgoda <jzgoda@o2.usun .pl> writes:
[color=blue]
> Bad idea. You may accidentally break some libraries that depend on ASCII
> being default & standard.[/color]

And what would those produce as output when fed with unicode data? How would
they handle this input? IMVHO nothing should rely on having a standard
charset as input. If it is required, then the library should set it up by
itself: explicit is better than implicit.

--
Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org >

"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
- Qualquer coisa dita em latim soa profundo.
- Anything said in Latin sounds smart.

[Jarek Zgoda]

Re: making 'utf-8' default codec

Jorge Godoy napisa³(a):
[color=blue][color=green]
>>Bad idea. You may accidentally break some libraries that depend on ASCII
>>being default & standard.[/color]
>
> And what would those produce as output when fed with unicode data? How would
> they handle this input? IMVHO nothing should rely on having a standard
> charset as input. If it is required, then the library should set it up by
> itself: explicit is better than implicit.[/color]

Besides that, changing default encoding will make program nearly
absolutely unportable as Python by default installs nearly everywhere
with ASCII as default encoding (with iSeries being the only exception
known to me).

--
Jarek Zgoda

http://jpa.berlios.de/