rexec in jython??

[Mark Fink]

Hi there,
I at the moment port a library from Python to Jython (at lease I try to
do so :-))). The library uses the Rexec to form a type adapter to cast
parameters given as text into the according Jython type. I learned
rexec is not available in Jython. Is something that is commonly used in
Jython for such tasks available?
In general: how do I find such information by myself?
Best Regards,
Mark

[Mark Fink]

Re: rexec in jython??

sorry for the double post!
It is the r_eval() functionality of the rexec module I am looking
forward to replace

[Mark Fink]

Re: rexec in jython??

this is really funny...
I tried to use eval(String) as an replacement. It works now but the
calculation results from my tests are not as expected: 2 + 3 = 23 !!! 2
- 3 = 2-3...
I have the feeling that there is a really easy solution for this.
Unfortunately I have no enough experience

[Diez B. Roggisch]

Re: rexec in jython??

Mark Fink wrote:
[color=blue]
> this is really funny...
> I tried to use eval(String) as an replacement. It works now but the
> calculation results from my tests are not as expected: 2 + 3 = 23 !!! 2
> - 3 = 2-3...
> I have the feeling that there is a really easy solution for this.
> Unfortunately I have no enough experience[/color]

How about showing code? Otherwise we all have to use our crystal balls, and
these thingies tend to be not so precise...

Diez

[Mark Fink]

Re: rexec in jython??

This is the original code section of the library including the
comments:
class AutoAdapter(Typ eAdapter):
"""
This adapter returns a type based on the format of the table cell
contents, following python's rules for literals (plus a few
others).
We could fall back on this when we don't know what type is
expected.
I am lazy and so use rexec to do the work.

#Note: The RExec class can prevent code from performing unsafe
#operations like reading or writing disk files, or using TCP/IP
#sockets. However, it does not protect against code using
#extremely large amounts of memory or processor time.
"""
r_eval = RExec().r_eval
def parse(self,s):
if s.strip().lower () == 'true':
return 1
elif s.strip().lower () == 'false':
return 0
else:
try:
return self.r_eval(s)
except SystemExit:
return None
except:
return s

I completely removed the import of rexec and replaced "return
self.r_eval(s)" with "return self.eval(s)"

[Diez B. Roggisch]

Re: rexec in jython??

Mark Fink wrote:
[color=blue]
> This is the original code section of the library including the
> comments:
> class AutoAdapter(Typ eAdapter):
> """
> This adapter returns a type based on the format of the table cell
> contents, following python's rules for literals (plus a few
> others).
> We could fall back on this when we don't know what type is
> expected.
> I am lazy and so use rexec to do the work.
>
> #Note: The RExec class can prevent code from performing unsafe
> #operations like reading or writing disk files, or using TCP/IP
> #sockets. However, it does not protect against code using
> #extremely large amounts of memory or processor time.
> """
> r_eval = RExec().r_eval
> def parse(self,s):
> if s.strip().lower () == 'true':
> return 1
> elif s.strip().lower () == 'false':
> return 0
> else:
> try:
> return self.r_eval(s)
> except SystemExit:
> return None
> except:
> return s
>
> I completely removed the import of rexec and replaced "return
> self.r_eval(s)" with "return self.eval(s)"[/color]

And what does self.eval look like? Crystal ball still not working....

Diez

[Mark Fink]

Re: rexec in jython??

:-))) it works!
I replaced it to "return eval(s)" and the results look extremely well
guess I should get one of this crystal balls myself.

one minor issue is still left:
correct me if I am wrong: result of 2/-3 is 0 (at least this is how it
is defined in the testcase)
In Jython 2.1.3:[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> 2/-3[/color][/color][/color]
-1
Anyway many thanks for your help. Without this would have taken forever.

[Kent Johnson]

Re: rexec in jython??

Mark Fink wrote:[color=blue]
> one minor issue is still left:
> correct me if I am wrong: result of 2/-3 is 0 (at least this is how it
> is defined in the testcase)
> In Jython 2.1.3:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>>2/-3[/color][/color]
>
> -1[/color]

CPython gives the same result and the language reference says, "Plain or
long integer division yields an integer of the same type; the result is
that of mathematical division with the `floor' function applied to the
result." so this seems to be intentional.

Kent