Problem with __str__ if baseclass is list

[Edward C. Jones]

#! /usr/bin/env python

class A(list):
def __init__(self, alist, n):
list.__init__(s elf, alist)
self.n = n

def __str__(self):
return 'AS(%s, %i)' % (list.__str__(s elf), self.n)

def __repr__(self):
return 'AR(%s, %i)' % (list.__repr__( self), self.n)

a = A(['x', 'y'], 7)

print 1, a
print 2, repr(a)
print 3, list.__str__(a)
print 4, list.__repr__(a )

"""
The output is:

1 AS(AR(['x', 'y'], 7), 7)
2 AR(['x', 'y'], 7)
3 AR(['x', 'y'], 7)
4 ['x', 'y']

Why is list.__str__(a) == "AR(['x', 'y'], 7)"?

Note: The problem goes away if "list.__str__(a )" is replaced with
"list.__repr__( self)".
"""

[Serge Orlov]

Re: Problem with __str__ if baseclass is list

Edward C. Jones wrote:[color=blue]
> #! /usr/bin/env python
>
> class A(list):
> def __init__(self, alist, n):
> list.__init__(s elf, alist)
> self.n = n
>
> def __str__(self):
> return 'AS(%s, %i)' % (list.__str__(s elf), self.n)
>
> def __repr__(self):
> return 'AR(%s, %i)' % (list.__repr__( self), self.n)
>
> a = A(['x', 'y'], 7)
>
> print 1, a
> print 2, repr(a)
> print 3, list.__str__(a)
> print 4, list.__repr__(a )
>
> """
> The output is:
>
> 1 AS(AR(['x', 'y'], 7), 7)
> 2 AR(['x', 'y'], 7)
> 3 AR(['x', 'y'], 7)
> 4 ['x', 'y']
>
> Why is list.__str__(a) == "AR(['x', 'y'], 7)"?[/color]

Because it's coded like this:
def __str__(self):
return repr(self)

That implies str(x) == repr(x), since you don't want that, don't call
list.__str__
[color=blue]
>
> Note: The problem goes away if "list.__str__(a )" is replaced with
> "list.__repr__( self)".
> """[/color]

That's right. You *cannot* call list.__str__ because it contradicts
design of class A