what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

[Martin Ambuhl]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:[color=blue]
> Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@earthl ink.net> writes:
>
> | Dan Perl wrote:
> |
> | > Actually, it can be as simple as:
> | > public class test {
> |
> | There is no "public" or "class" in C. Please don't post such trash to
> | comp.lang.c. In fact, C++ is not topical in any of the five
>
> But, it was anything but C++. Maybe Java.
>[/color]

And why is Java topical for any of the five newsgroups he spewed on,
which deal with perl, python, lisp, scheme, and C? There must be a high
correlation between using Java and idiocy.

[Keith Thompson]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

jacob navia <jacob@jacob.re mcomp.fr> writes:[color=blue]
> Good post.
>
> First article that demistifies this OO centered approach
> in quite a long time.[/color]

I have no idea whether it was "good" or not, but it was blatantly
off-topic in at least comp.lang.c, and probably all the other
newsgroups to which it was cross-posted. Jacob, please don't
encourage this kind of newsgroup abuse.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keit h) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

[CBFalconer]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

jacob navia wrote:[color=blue]
>
> Good post.
>
> First article that demistifies this OO centered approach
> in quite a long time.
>
> This approach has its strength, but also has it weakness,
> it is not the solution for every problem appearing in
> data processing.[/color]

Xah Lee is a known troll, who likes to crosspost to many OT groups
and stir up the ants. F'ups set.

--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.c om, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson

[PA]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?


On Jan 29, 2005, at 04:28, beliavsky@aol.c om wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
>> Plus, a man which such cinematographic tastes [1] cannot be entirely
>> bad :P
>>
>> http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/Person...te_movies.html[/color]
>
> The site proves he is evil. Grep "Titus" if you have a strong stomach.
> I'm sure you did not get that far.[/color]

I went all the way down with Ms Carrera :P

http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/Personal_dir/porn_movies.html

At least give him credit for listing Caro's and Jeunet's "La Cité des
enfants perdus":

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112682/

After all, it's not always easy "Being John Malkovich":

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0120601/

Specially when you are "Leaving Las Vegas".

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0113627/

In any case, these are just "Sex, Lies, and Videotape":

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0098724/

Perhaps getting "Bound" to those "Heavenly Creatures" is too "Exotica"
for you?

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0115736/

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0110005/

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0109759/

But lets not play "The Crying Game":

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104036/

This is all "Pulp Fiction" anyway:

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/

Time to "Run Lola Run" to "Brazil":

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0130827/

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0088846/

Before "Blade Runner" tracks you down:

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/

Cheers

--
PA, Onnay Equitursay

http://alt.textdrive.com/

[PA]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?


On Jan 29, 2005, at 08:34, jacob navia wrote:
[color=blue]
> First article that demistifies this OO centered approach
> in quite a long time.[/color]

http://www.google.com/search?q=OOP+criticism&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=OOP+debunked&btnG=Search

Cheers

--
PA, Onnay Equitursay

http://alt.textdrive.com/

[Larry]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?


Xah Lee wrote:[color=blue]
> in computer languages, often a function definition looks like this:[/color]
[color=blue]
> xah@xahlee.org
> http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html[/color]

Your ideas are original, insightful and simply reflect incredibly deep
creative genius. I have read your work and I want to hire you for
highly classified work in software design and philosophical writing.
Would you possibly be available to meet with me in my secret mountain
compound to discuss terms?

Larry

[Pascal Bourguignon]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

"Larry" <larry_wallet@y ahoo.com> writes:
[color=blue]
> Xah Lee wrote:[color=green]
> > in computer languages, often a function definition looks like this:[/color]
>[color=green]
> > xah@xahlee.org
> > http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html[/color]
>
> Your ideas are original, insightful and simply reflect incredibly deep
> creative genius. I have read your work and I want to hire you for
> highly classified work in software design and philosophical writing.
> Would you possibly be available to meet with me in my secret mountain
> compound to discuss terms?
>
> Larry[/color]

You forgot to mention the coordinates of your secret mountain compound:

28 deg 5 min N, 86 deg 58 min E


--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/

Nobody can fix the economy. Nobody can be trusted with their finger
on the button. Nobody's perfect. VOTE FOR NOBODY.

[Cesar Rabak]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

Pascal Bourguignon escreveu:[color=blue]
> "Larry" <larry_wallet@y ahoo.com> writes:
>
>[color=green]
>>Xah Lee wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>in computer languages, often a function definition looks like this:[/color]
>>[color=darkred]
>>> xah@xahlee.org
>>> http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html[/color]
>>
>>Your ideas are original, insightful and simply reflect incredibly deep
>>creative genius. I have read your work and I want to hire you for
>>highly classified work in software design and philosophical writing.
>>Would you possibly be available to meet with me in my secret mountain
>>compound to discuss terms?
>>
>>Larry[/color]
>
>
> You forgot to mention the coordinates of your secret mountain compound:
>
> 28 deg 5 min N, 86 deg 58 min E
>[/color]
Pascal!!

You spoiled a carefully kept Larry's secret. . . now it will have to
change his compound. . .

[Grumble]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
[color=blue]
> You forgot to mention the coordinates of your secret mountain compound:
>
> 28 deg 5 min N, 86 deg 58 min E[/color]

Mount Everest?

[Bradd W. Szonye]

Re: what's OOP's jargons and complexities?

Grumble <devnull@kma.eu .org> wrote:[color=blue]
> Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
>[color=green]
>> You forgot to mention the coordinates of your secret mountain compound:
>>
>> 28 deg 5 min N, 86 deg 58 min E[/color]
>
> Mount Everest?[/color]

Shhh!
--
Bradd W. Szonye

http://www.szonye.com/bradd