pyMagick vs PIL

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Tony C
    #1

    pyMagick vs PIL

    I've used Image Magick before, and I'm happy with it.
    When I searched for Python extensions for Image Magick, I found an
    unsupported
    (an old) version of pyMagick.

    I'm wondering if this was very popular, or if the author just didn't
    have time to continue supporting it.

    I'd like to hear from someone who used pyMagick and PIL, for some
    comparative opinions.


    thanks
    Tags: None
    • JanC
      #2
      Re: pyMagick vs PIL

      cappy2112@yahoo .com (Tony C) schreef:
      [color=blue]
      > I've used Image Magick before, and I'm happy with it.
      > When I searched for Python extensions for Image Magick, I found an
      > unsupported (an old) version of pyMagick.[/color]

      There's also the PythonMagick bindings for GraphicsMagick:
      <http://www.procoders.n et/moinmoin/PythonMagick>

      --
      JanC

      "Be strict when sending and tolerant when receiving."
      RFC 1958 - Architectural Principles of the Internet - section 3.9

        Comment

        Previous template Next
        Working...