What GUI toolkit looks the best?

[Paul Rubin]

I've been approached about writing a Windows app which will need a
really professional looking GUI. Forget TKinter, this has to actually
look good (real artists will be available to get the visual stuff
right). Assuming I write in Python, what's the best toolkit to use?
Some cost in implementation pain is tolerable if the finished
interface looks better as a result. It would be nice if the toolkit
runs on multiple platforms rather than being Windows-only.

I'm thinking Glade. Is that reasonable? I don't know squat about
Windows and haven't done much fancy GUI programming since the early X
days.

Thanks.

[Brian Kelley]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

Paul Rubin wrote:
[color=blue]
> I've been approached about writing a Windows app which will need a
> really professional looking GUI. Forget TKinter, this has to actually
> look good (real artists will be available to get the visual stuff
> right). Assuming I write in Python, what's the best toolkit to use?
> Some cost in implementation pain is tolerable if the finished
> interface looks better as a result. It would be nice if the toolkit
> runs on multiple platforms rather than being Windows-only.[/color]

Why forget Tkinter? I've seen Tkinter applications that look incredibly
fabulous. A lot depends on what you are trying to do. If you are
making a graphics-heavy application then Tkinter's canvas is pretty
sweet. I also think IDLE looks pretty good.
[color=blue]
> I'm thinking Glade. Is that reasonable? I don't know squat about
> Windows and haven't done much fancy GUI programming since the early X
> days.[/color]

Glade isn't a GUI, it is a GUI builder that uses GTK. In my experience,
GTK doesn't look quite right on windows boxes, especially the menus. Of
course I have the same basic view of Qt and Swing so know you know my
biases.

I tend to use Tkinter for canvas heavy applications and wxPython for
other stuff.

As for application building, here are my rankings
1 Emacs :)
2 Glade with libglade and Mitch Chapman's python libglade wrapper
3 BlackAdder with Qt
4 Boa-constructor (largish learning curve here I think)
5 wxGlade (layout isn't quite right)

So let me ask what kind of application are you building?

The bottom line is that I have seen great looking and really poor
looking apps in all of these gui's.

Here is my humble opinions in a nutshell (missing a lot here): wxPython
has a grid control to die for and many, many classes, good printer
support and looks like a native GTK app on Linux and a native app on
windows and macintosh. Qt is better for developing - it has a better
class structure and I tend not to have to look up docs as often and can
look really, really nice. Tkinter has a killer canvas and great
postscript output. GTK is really quite fast.

but don't take my word for this, why don't you see what you like the best?

http://www.wxpython.org/

http://www.gtk.org/

http://www.scriptics.com/

http://www.trolltech.com/

Speaking of Qt, does anyone want to make a python binding to jakasha?

http://www.jahshaka.com/

Brian

[Cameron Laird]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

In article <od_Bb.500677$H S4.3867626@attb i_s01>,
Brian Kelley <bkelley@wi.mit .edu> wrote:[color=blue]
>Paul Rubin wrote:
>[color=green]
>> I've been approached about writing a Windows app which will need a
>> really professional looking GUI. Forget TKinter, this has to actually
>> look good (real artists will be available to get the visual stuff
>> right). Assuming I write in Python, what's the best toolkit to use?[/color][/color]

[Paul Rubin]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

claird@lairds.c om (Cameron Laird) writes:[color=blue]
> Paul, I certainly can understand your dismissal of Tkinter
> as it's commonly employed. Are you aware, though, of <URL:
> http://tcl.projectforum.com/tk/Home > and <URL:
> http://mini.net/tcl/10424 >? Tkinter might, in fact, best
> meet your requirements.[/color]

No I'm not. I wrote one tkinter application just to try it out and
while it was nice for putting up a quick and dirty gui, it looked very
crude and the API was also quite inflexible. I clicked the first of
those two url's and it seems to be an in-progress discussion about how
to rework tcl to fix its limitations, but I don't want to rely on
something that's not yet already working. Thanks though.

[P@draigBrady.com]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

Brian Kelley wrote:[color=blue]
> Paul Rubin wrote:
>[color=green]
>> I've been approached about writing a Windows app which will need a
>> really professional looking GUI. Forget TKinter, this has to actually
>> look good (real artists will be available to get the visual stuff
>> right). Assuming I write in Python, what's the best toolkit to use?
>> Some cost in implementation pain is tolerable if the finished
>> interface looks better as a result. It would be nice if the toolkit
>> runs on multiple platforms rather than being Windows-only.[/color]
>
>
> Why forget Tkinter? I've seen Tkinter applications that look incredibly
> fabulous. A lot depends on what you are trying to do. If you are
> making a graphics-heavy application then Tkinter's canvas is pretty
> sweet. I also think IDLE looks pretty good.
>[color=green]
>> I'm thinking Glade. Is that reasonable? I don't know squat about
>> Windows and haven't done much fancy GUI programming since the early X
>> days.[/color]
>
>
> Glade isn't a GUI, it is a GUI builder that uses GTK. In my experience,
> GTK doesn't look quite right on windows boxes, especially the menus. Of
> course I have the same basic view of Qt and Swing so know you know my
> biases.
>
> I tend to use Tkinter for canvas heavy applications and wxPython for
> other stuff.
>
> As for application building, here are my rankings
> 1 Emacs :)
> 2 Glade with libglade and Mitch Chapman's python libglade wrapper[/color]

Freaky. I've been using something VERY similar for the last 2 years.
An example of my libglade.py usage is at:

http://www.pixelbeat.org/talks/pygtk/mail/

Great minds think alike I suppose :-)

Pádraig.

[Cameron Laird]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

In article <7xekvb1koc.fsf @ruckus.brouhah a.com>,
Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.i nvalid> wrote:[color=blue]
>claird@lairds. com (Cameron Laird) writes:[color=green]
>> Paul, I certainly can understand your dismissal of Tkinter
>> as it's commonly employed. Are you aware, though, of <URL:
>> http://tcl.projectforum.com/tk/Home > and <URL:
>> http://mini.net/tcl/10424 >? Tkinter might, in fact, best
>> meet your requirements.[/color]
>
>No I'm not. I wrote one tkinter application just to try it out and
>while it was nice for putting up a quick and dirty gui, it looked very
>crude and the API was also quite inflexible. I clicked the first of
>those two url's and it seems to be an in-progress discussion about how
>to rework tcl to fix its limitations, but I don't want to rely on
>something that's not yet already working. Thanks though.[/color]

I persist at this out of concern that I'm not making things clear.
My stake, incidentally, is that you be successful, not that you
use any particular toolkit.

The second URL gives working code that you can use immediately in
your own applications to improve their appearance. This is not an
extension or anything at all difficult or constraining; it's just
a little prologue that refines the standard Tkinter appearance.
It *is* in use, right now, in several applications that must have
professional appearances. The first URL is about committee work,
essentially, that will fold the enhancements of the second URL
back into the standard Tk distribution.
--

Cameron Laird <claird@phaseit .net>
Business: http://www.Phaseit.net

[Paul Rubin]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

Brian Kelley <bkelley@wi.mit .edu> writes:[color=blue]
> Why forget Tkinter? I've seen Tkinter applications that look
> incredibly fabulous.[/color]

Got any url's for screen shots?
[color=blue]
> A lot depends on what you are trying to do. If
> you are making a graphics-heavy application then Tkinter's canvas is
> pretty sweet. I also think IDLE looks pretty good.[/color]

There will be some graphical icons and stuff like that which people
will click on, but no really heavy graphics or drawing tools in the
sense of a photo editor or anything like that.
[color=blue]
> Glade isn't a GUI, it is a GUI builder that uses GTK. In my
> experience, GTK doesn't look quite right on windows boxes, especially
> the menus. Of course I have the same basic view of Qt and Swing so
> know you know my biases.[/color]

Oh ok, I understand a bit better now.
[color=blue]
> I tend to use Tkinter for canvas heavy applications and wxPython for
> other stuff.[/color]

Is wxPython Windows specific? I guess it is, but can I port the
screen layouts to some comparable Linux toolkit or anything like that?
The screen shots for it do look really nice.
[color=blue]
> Here is my humble opinions in a nutshell (missing a lot here):
> wxPython has a grid control to die for and many, many classes, good
> printer support and looks like a native GTK app on Linux and a native
> app on windows and macintosh.[/color]

Oh wow, yes I guess it's cross platform then. Hmm, what Micro$oft
tool do I need to build and run it? Is Visual C++ enough? I guess
I can get the client to pay for some stuff like that. Also, is there
a Glade-like drag and drop gui editor for it?
[color=blue]
> Qt is better for developing - it has a better class structure and I
> tend not to have to look up docs as often and can look really,
> really nice.[/color]

The KDE apps that I've seen look good but not really top notch. Maybe
more attention could improve them. They're certainly good enough for
practical use.
[color=blue]
> Tkinter has a killer canvas and great postscript output. GTK is
> really quite fast.[/color]

I think I don't care about heavy duty graphics or more than rudimentary
printing.
[color=blue]
> but don't take my word for this, why don't you see what you like the best?
>
> http://www.wxpython.org/
> http://www.gtk.org/
> http://www.scriptics.com/
> http://www.trolltech.com/[/color]

I don't know what I can really tell from these without more experience
with them. In particular, which is the most solid and reliable across
a wide range of Windows versions (95, 98, ..., XP whatever)? That
matters too.

Thanks!

Paul

[Paul Rubin]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

claird@lairds.c om (Cameron Laird) writes:[color=blue]
> I persist at this out of concern that I'm not making things clear.
> My stake, incidentally, is that you be successful, not that you
> use any particular toolkit.
>
> The second URL gives working code that you can use immediately in
> your own applications to improve their appearance. This is not an
> extension or anything at all difficult or constraining; it's just
> a little prologue that refines the standard Tkinter appearance.
> It *is* in use, right now, in several applications that must have
> professional appearances. The first URL is about committee work,
> essentially, that will fold the enhancements of the second URL
> back into the standard Tk distribution.[/color]

Oh cool. The second screen shot on that page ("after") does look a
lot better than the "before" shot. I guess I'll look at it more
carefully, but Tkinter has always made me cringe because of its use of
tcl (why does it need its own extension language if Python itself is
supposed to be such a good one)? Thanks.

[Brian Kelley]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

Paul Rubin wrote:[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>>Here is my humble opinions in a nutshell (missing a lot here):
>>wxPython has a grid control to die for and many, many classes, good
>>printer support and looks like a native GTK app on Linux and a native
>>app on windows and macintosh.[/color]
>
>
> Oh wow, yes I guess it's cross platform then. Hmm, what Micro$oft
> tool do I need to build and run it? Is Visual C++ enough? I guess
> I can get the client to pay for some stuff like that. Also, is there
> a Glade-like drag and drop gui editor for it?[/color]

None. Just download the wxpython binaries and away you go. If you want
to build from scratch Visual C++ is enough. wxGlade is a good designer
although it does have some warts. wxDesigner is good as well, although
not free.

http://www.wxpython.org/

wxGlade

http://wxglade.sourceforge.net/

wxDesigner

http://www.roebling.de/

And join the wxpython mailing list. You'll be glad that you did.
Brian

[Edward K. Ream]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

I have a lot of experience with both wxPython and Tkinter. I would urge
caution regarding any quick judgments. All cross-platform toolkits have
significant bugs and design flaws.

My experience is that Tkinter is the "least bad" and more flexible.
wxPython (of course) inherits all the _many_ bugs in wxWindows. It's not
clear that wxWindows really actually works. Whenever I use
wxPython/wxWindows I find more bugs in a week than I have found in 3+ years
with Tk/Tkinter. YMMV. The (admittedly very cool) wxPython demo regularly
segfaults on Windows. Sheesh.

The main point is that some real experimentation (and risk!) is going to be
required for any significant project. You may as well budget some time for
frustration: it _is_ going to be there.

Just one example of what you might expect. My app uses a Text widget in
many non-trivial ways. Both Tkinter/Tk and wxPython/wxWindows have
seemingly minor, but actually _major_ problems with Text widgets.

Tk "helpfully" adds a newline at the end of text widgets in various
situations, which leads to no end of complications in my app. I wish Tk
would just _buzz off_ and not mess with my data. But noooooo.

The wxWindows Text widget, OTOH, uses an absolutely brain-dead api that
exposes platform-specific line endings. The complications become truly
horrendous for serious work: there is no proper model behind Text offsets.

Actually, both Tkinter and wxPython totally suck regarding offsets into text
widgets. One would like integer offset in the text widget to be _identical
in all respects_ with the integer offset into the Python strings that one
passes to and receives from these widgets. But nooooooo... I call this the
"cursed offset problem", which is really a special case of the "cursed
newline problem" :-)

In short, any cross-platform gui is going to cause you unexpected problems.
I'm not saying "don't use these tools". I am saying: "be prepared for nasty
surprises".

Edward

P.S. The idea that Tk is going to be "revitalize d" any time soon is a
yawner, IMO. Wake me up when it happens.

EKR
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward K. Ream email: edreamleo@chart er.net
Leo: Literate Editor with Outlines
Leo: http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------

[Cameron Laird]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

In article <7x65gn1jk5.fsf @ruckus.brouhah a.com>,
Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.i nvalid> wrote:

[Cameron Laird]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

In article <7xad5z1jq5.fsf @ruckus.brouhah a.com>,
Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.i nvalid> wrote:[color=blue]
>Brian Kelley <bkelley@wi.mit .edu> writes:[color=green]
>> Why forget Tkinter? I've seen Tkinter applications that look
>> incredibly fabulous.[/color]
>
>Got any url's for screen shots?[/color]

[John Roth]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?


"Paul Rubin" <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.i nvalid> wrote in message
news:7x65gn1jk5 .fsf@ruckus.bro uhaha.com...[color=blue]
> claird@lairds.c om (Cameron Laird) writes:[color=green]
> > I persist at this out of concern that I'm not making things clear.
> > My stake, incidentally, is that you be successful, not that you
> > use any particular toolkit.
> >
> > The second URL gives working code that you can use immediately in
> > your own applications to improve their appearance. This is not an
> > extension or anything at all difficult or constraining; it's just
> > a little prologue that refines the standard Tkinter appearance.
> > It *is* in use, right now, in several applications that must have
> > professional appearances. The first URL is about committee work,
> > essentially, that will fold the enhancements of the second URL
> > back into the standard Tk distribution.[/color]
>
> Oh cool. The second screen shot on that page ("after") does look a
> lot better than the "before" shot. I guess I'll look at it more
> carefully, but Tkinter has always made me cringe because of its use of
> tcl (why does it need its own extension language if Python itself is
> supposed to be such a good one)? Thanks.[/color]

And that is what is called a "real good question." I believe that
you're supposed to be able to use the Tk libraries without using
TCL, but the people that wrote Tkinter weren't able to make it
work. I don't, however, know this for a fact, it's just something
that's bouncing around the old synapses...

John Roth

[Cameron Laird]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

In article <vth78mea92j65e @news.supernews .com>,
John Roth <newsgroups@jhr othjr.com> wrote:

[Fredrik Lundh]

Re: What GUI toolkit looks the best?

Edward K. Ream wrote:
[color=blue]
> Tk "helpfully" adds a newline at the end of text widgets in various
> situations, which leads to no end of complications in my app. I wish Tk
> would just _buzz off_ and not mess with my data. But noooooo.[/color]

that's why you should design your own leo widget:

http://effbot.org/zone/wck.htm

half-serious-ly yrs /F