global variables ?

[ruari mactaggart]

how do I assign a value to a variable inside a function then use it in the
main body ?

i am trying to unpickle a dictionary in a function to use it in the program

ruari

[Alex Martelli]

Re: global variables ?

ruari mactaggart wrote:
[color=blue]
> how do I assign a value to a variable inside a function then use it in the
> main body ?[/color]

If the variable name is for example 'isbadforyou', start the function with
the statement:

global isbadforyou

[color=blue]
> i am trying to unpickle a dictionary in a function to use it in the
> program[/color]

By far the best approach for this is to have the function work with
local variables (faster as well as cleaner), preparing the dictionary
say in local variable 'result', and end the function with:

return result

then, the function's caller gets to decide the name (a sounder
organization!) just by calling the function in some way such as:

thenameilike = thefunction(its , arguments, ifany)


Alex

[John Roth]

Re: global variables ?


"ruari mactaggart" <ruari@charlief ortune.com> wrote in message
news:bo04ou$382 $1@news8.svr.po l.co.uk...[color=blue]
> how do I assign a value to a variable inside a function then use it in the
> main body ?
>
> i am trying to unpickle a dictionary in a function to use it in the[/color]
program

Since Alex has already mentioned the 'global' statement,
I won't dwell on it. I'd just mention that it's a whole lot
simpler to use a global dictionary or an object instance
than to use a simple variable that has to be rebound.

For example:

foobar = "huh?"

def snafu():
global foobar
foobar = "what?"


Using a dictionary, it looks like this:

foodict = {foobar: "huh?"}

def snafu():
foodict["foobar"] = "what?"

That lets you consolidate all of those messy global variables
in one place as well as giving you a name you can use for
better internal documentation.

John Roth[color=blue]
>
> ruari
>
>[/color]

[ruari mactaggart]

Re: global variables ?

thank you ! It works now. This is very satisfying.

John Roth <newsgroups@jhr othjr.com> wrote in message
news:vq78f2gc8b gv59@news.super news.com...[color=blue]
>
> "ruari mactaggart" <ruari@charlief ortune.com> wrote in message
> news:bo04ou$382 $1@news8.svr.po l.co.uk...[color=green]
> > how do I assign a value to a variable inside a function then use it in[/color][/color]
the[color=blue][color=green]
> > main body ?
> >
> > i am trying to unpickle a dictionary in a function to use it in the[/color]
> program
>
> Since Alex has already mentioned the 'global' statement,
> I won't dwell on it. I'd just mention that it's a whole lot
> simpler to use a global dictionary or an object instance
> than to use a simple variable that has to be rebound.
>
> For example:
>
> foobar = "huh?"
>
> def snafu():
> global foobar
> foobar = "what?"
>
>
> Using a dictionary, it looks like this:
>
> foodict = {foobar: "huh?"}
>
> def snafu():
> foodict["foobar"] = "what?"
>
> That lets you consolidate all of those messy global variables
> in one place as well as giving you a name you can use for
> better internal documentation.
>
> John Roth[color=green]
> >
> > ruari
> >
> >[/color]
>
>[/color]

[Emile van Sebille]

Re: global variables ?

Ulrich Petri:[color=blue]
>
> Well - no. It's not.
> Globals are bad, ugly, ...
>[/color]

Well, not in and of themselves. They're used in about 200 places in the
standard distribution, and there's talk (although no plans) of extending the
syntax further to allow designation of an encompassing (or possible other)
namespace, as in:

global var in namespace


Emile van Sebille
emile@fenx.com

[Ulrich Petri]

Re: global variables ?


"ruari mactaggart" <ruari@charlief ortune.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:bo0cuk$sj0 $1@news6.svr.po l.co.uk...[color=blue]
> John Roth <newsgroups@jhr othjr.com> wrote in message
> news:vq78f2gc8b gv59@news.super news.com...[color=green]
> > Using a dictionary, it looks like this:
> >
> > foodict = {foobar: "huh?"}
> >
> > def snafu():
> > foodict["foobar"] = "what?"
> >
> > That lets you consolidate all of those messy global variables
> > in one place as well as giving you a name you can use for
> > better internal documentation.
> >
> > John Roth[/color]
>
> thank you ! It works now. This is very satisfying.
>[/color]

Well - no. It's not.
Globals are bad, ugly, ...