timeoutsocket.py

[Gilles Lenfant]

Hi,

I'm looking for the "official" timeoutsocket.p y by Timothy O'Malley (maybe
he'll read this :)

I got this in my bookmarks...

http://www.timo-tasi.org/python/timeoutsocket.py

....but it seems to be dead at the time of writing this.
Some other versions seems to be available but google didn't help (or didn't
search correctly) to locate the latest stable version.

Many thanks in advance.

--
Gilles

[Benoit Dejean]

Re: timeoutsocket.p y

Le Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:29:52 +0100, Gilles Lenfant a écrit :
[color=blue]
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for the "official" timeoutsocket.p y by Timothy O'Malley (maybe
> he'll read this :)
>
> I got this in my bookmarks...
>
> http://www.timo-tasi.org/python/timeoutsocket.py[/color]

google -> http://vsbabu.org/tools/viewcvs.cgi/...meoutsocket.py

[Gilles Lenfant]

Re: timeoutsocket.p y

"Benoit Dejean" <bnet@ifrance.c om> a écrit dans le message de news:
pan.2003.10.31. 10.56.13.865387 @ifrance.com...[color=blue]
> Le Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:29:52 +0100, Gilles Lenfant a écrit :
>[color=green]
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking for the "official" timeoutsocket.p y by Timothy O'Malley[/color][/color]
(maybe[color=blue][color=green]
> > he'll read this :)
> >
> > I got this in my bookmarks...
> >
> > http://www.timo-tasi.org/python/timeoutsocket.py[/color]
>
> google -> http://vsbabu.org/tools/viewcvs.cgi/...meoutsocket.py
>
>[/color]

Yes,

I found others like this one but your link provides the cvs revision 1.1
when the latest dowload I got has the cvs revision 1.23.
Other searches through google didn't drive to cvs revisions >= 1.23.
I'll keep working with my old(?) version unless www.timo-tasi.org is up
again.

Thanks anyway

--
Gilles

[Aahz]

Re: timeoutsocket.p y

In article <bntcnb$219r$1@ biggoron.nerim. net>,
Gilles Lenfant <glenfant@NOSPA M.bigfoot.com> wrote:[color=blue]
>
>I'm looking for the "official" timeoutsocket.p y by Timothy O'Malley (maybe
>he'll read this :)
>
>I got this in my bookmarks...
>http://www.timo-tasi.org/python/timeoutsocket.py[/color]

Note that if you upgrade to Python 2.3, it's now built-in.
--
Aahz (aahz@pythoncra ft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
--Bill Harlan

[John J. Lee]

Re: timeoutsocket.p y

aahz@pythoncraf t.com (Aahz) writes:
[color=blue]
> In article <bntcnb$219r$1@ biggoron.nerim. net>,
> Gilles Lenfant <glenfant@NOSPA M.bigfoot.com> wrote:[color=green]
> >
> >I'm looking for the "official" timeoutsocket.p y by Timothy O'Malley (maybe
> >he'll read this :)
> >
> >I got this in my bookmarks...
> >http://www.timo-tasi.org/python/timeoutsocket.py[/color]
>
> Note that if you upgrade to Python 2.3, it's now built-in.[/color]
[...]

Also note there was a bug in timeoutsocket for recent Pythons -- a
missing method. There's a c.l.py thread where I describe it, I'm
pretty sure.


John

[Gilles Lenfant]

Re: timeoutsocket.p y

"Aahz" <aahz@pythoncra ft.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
bnttsf$d0h$1@pa nix2.panix.com. ..[color=blue]
> In article <bntcnb$219r$1@ biggoron.nerim. net>,
> Gilles Lenfant <glenfant@NOSPA M.bigfoot.com> wrote:[color=green]
> >
> >I'm looking for the "official" timeoutsocket.p y by Timothy O'Malley[/color][/color]
(maybe[color=blue][color=green]
> >he'll read this :)
> >
> >I got this in my bookmarks...
> >http://www.timo-tasi.org/python/timeoutsocket.py[/color]
>
> Note that if you upgrade to Python 2.3, it's now built-in.[/color]

Thanks, I know this, but I need to stay with Python 2.2.x because the latest
Zope claims for it.

--
Gilles

[color=blue]
> --
> Aahz (aahz@pythoncra ft.com) <*>[/color]
http://www.pythoncraft.com/[color=blue]
>
> "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
> --Bill Harlan[/color]

[Gilles Lenfant]

Re: timeoutsocket.p y

"John J. Lee" <jjl@pobox.co m> a écrit dans le message de news:
878ymx9j0t.fsf@ pobox.com...[color=blue]
> "Gilles Lenfant" <glenfant@NOSPA M.bigfoot.com> writes:
> [...][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > Note that if you upgrade to Python 2.3, it's now built-in.[/color]
> >
> > Thanks, I know this, but I need to stay with Python 2.2.x because[/color]
> [...]
>
> Do note this thread, then:
>
>[/color]

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=mailman.1037399909.22831.python-list%40pyt

hon.org[color=blue]
>
>
> John[/color]

Many thanks...

--
Gilles