zip() or what?

[Ray Tomes]

Hi all

Many thanks to those that answered my questions about whitespace and ord()
being reverse of chr(). As well as the 2 things I asked about I learned
about 5 other useful things.

This I am trying to flip an array around so that the "subscripts " happen
in the opposite order and reading the docs I thought that zip() did this.
So I tried it like this:

x=[[0.1,0.2],[1.1,1.2],[2.1,2.2]]
print zip(x)

and what I got was (removing the .0000000001s):

[([0.1, 0.2],), ([1.1, 1.2],), ([2.1, 2.2],)]

which is just my original array with an extra useless level in it.
What I really wanted was this:

[[0.1,1.1,2.1],[0.2,1.2,2.2]]

So my question is how do I do that easily?
And what on earth is zip() doing?

Alternatively, is there a construct to get x[*][i] if you know what I mean?

Have fun

Ray

[Erik Max Francis]

Re: zip() or what?

Ray Tomes wrote:
[color=blue]
> What I really wanted was this:
>
> [[0.1,1.1,2.1],[0.2,1.2,2.2]]
>
> So my question is how do I do that easily?[/color]

You wanted

zip(*x)
[color=blue]
> Alternatively, is there a construct to get x[*][i] if you know what I
> mean?[/color]

Probably

[i[1] for i in x]

or

map(lambda i: i[1], x)

--
Erik Max Francis && max@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && &tSftDotIotE
/ \ What would physics look like without gravitation?
\__/ Albert Einstein

[Ray Tomes]

Re: zip() or what?

Erik Max Francis wrote:[color=blue]
> Ray Tomes wrote:[color=green]
>>request to flip array ...[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> zip(*x)[/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
>>Alternatively , is there a construct to get x[*][i] if you know what I
>>mean?[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> [i[1] for i in x][/color]

Thanks Erik, these do just what I want.
I can understand the 2nd one, but I don't get the meaning of the * in the
first. Is this like the opposite of putting [] around something or what?
Under what circumstances can an * be used like this, and what is it
called? - I don't know how to look for it in the docs :-)

also, ...

achrist@easystr eet.com wrote:[color=blue]
> Ray Tomes wrote:[color=green]
>>This I am trying to flip an array around so that the "subscripts " happen
>>in the opposite order[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> [x[-i-1] for i in range(len(x))][/color]

Thanks Al, but that was not the flip I was looking for sorry - I hadn't
realised it could be taken another way. I wanted to swap the subscripts
with each other (a 45 degree reflection) not within one subscript end to
end (a 90 degree reflection). Erik has done the one I wanted.

[Ray Tomes]

Re: zip() or what?

Erik Max Francis wrote:[color=blue]
> Ray Tomes wrote:[color=green]
>>request to flip array ...[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> zip(*x)[/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
>>Alternatively , is there a construct to get x[*][i] if you know what I
>>mean?[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> [i[1] for i in x][/color]

Thanks Erik, these do just what I want.
I can understand the 2nd one, but I don't get the meaning of the * in the
first. Is this like the opposite of putting [] around something or what?
Under what circumstances can an * be used like this, and what is it
called? - I don't know how to look for it in the docs :-)

also, ...

achrist@easystr eet.com wrote:[color=blue]
> Ray Tomes wrote:[color=green]
>>This I am trying to flip an array around so that the "subscripts " happen
>>in the opposite order[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> [x[-i-1] for i in range(len(x))][/color]

Thanks Al, but that was not the flip I was looking for sorry - I hadn't
realised it could be taken another way. I wanted to swap the subscripts
with each other (a 45 degree reflection) not within one subscript end to
end (a 90 degree reflection). Erik has done the one I wanted.

[Erik Max Francis]

Re: zip() or what?

Ray Tomes wrote:
[color=blue]
> I can understand the 2nd one, but I don't get the meaning of the * in
> the
> first. Is this like the opposite of putting [] around something or
> what?
> Under what circumstances can an * be used like this, and what is it
> called? - I don't know how to look for it in the docs :-)[/color]

f(x) calls the function f with the single argument x. f(*x) calls f
with the arguments x, which is expected to be a sequence. The * syntax
comes from defining functions, where a formal argument preceded by *
means, "All the rest of the arguments as a tuple." So:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> def f(*x): print x[/color][/color][/color]
....[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> s = [1, 2, 3]
>>> f(s)[/color][/color][/color]
([1, 2, 3],)[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> f(*s)[/color][/color][/color]
(1, 2, 3)

The old way of writing the function call f(*x) was apply(f, x).

--
Erik Max Francis && max@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && &tSftDotIotE
/ \ War is like love, it always finds a way.
\__/ Bertolt Brecht