Re: Python doc problem example: gzip module (reprise)
On 05 Nov 2005 19:19:29 -0800, Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.i nvalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.or g> writes:[color=green][color=darkred]
>> > It's only -because- of those licenses that there's any reason not to
>> > bundle.[/color]
>>
>> Actually, there are other reasons, just as there are reasons besides
>> licensing for not simply including third party libraries into the
>> standard library.[/color]
>
>I'm not talking about 3rd party libraries, I'm talking about 3rd party
>documentatio n for modules that are already in the Python standard
>library. For example, if someone wrote a good Tkinter manual that
>were licensed in a way that the PSF could drop it into the Python
>distro, then PSF should certainly consider including it. The same
>goes for good docs about urllib2, or various other modules that
>currently have lousy docs.
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>> > I found
>> > http://infohost.nmt.edu/tcc/help/lan...n/tkinter.html
>> > to be a pretty good tutorial, though incomplete as a reference.[/color]
>>
>> Thanks for the URL, but that's just a short list of links, most of
>> which I've already seen.[/color]
>
>Sorry, I meant:
>
> http://infohost.nmt.edu/tcc/help/pubs/tkinter/ (html)
> http://www.nmt.edu/tcc/help/pubs/tkinter.pdf (pdf of same)
>
>You've probably seen this manual already.[/color]
If not, I'll second the recommendation for the pdf. It's not complete, but
it's quite useful and pretty easy to use. Hm, seems to be updated since I
downloaded a copy, guess I'll grab the newest ;-) Hm2, it doubled in size!
The creation dates are
*** FILE tkinter.pdf ***
/CreationDate (D:200304161705 00)
*** FILE tkinter2.pdf ***
/CreationDate (D:200508031142 34)
So I guess it could double in 2 years 4 months. I'll have to look into it.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
On 05 Nov 2005 19:19:29 -0800, Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.i nvalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.or g> writes:[color=green][color=darkred]
>> > It's only -because- of those licenses that there's any reason not to
>> > bundle.[/color]
>>
>> Actually, there are other reasons, just as there are reasons besides
>> licensing for not simply including third party libraries into the
>> standard library.[/color]
>
>I'm not talking about 3rd party libraries, I'm talking about 3rd party
>documentatio n for modules that are already in the Python standard
>library. For example, if someone wrote a good Tkinter manual that
>were licensed in a way that the PSF could drop it into the Python
>distro, then PSF should certainly consider including it. The same
>goes for good docs about urllib2, or various other modules that
>currently have lousy docs.
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>> > I found
>> > http://infohost.nmt.edu/tcc/help/lan...n/tkinter.html
>> > to be a pretty good tutorial, though incomplete as a reference.[/color]
>>
>> Thanks for the URL, but that's just a short list of links, most of
>> which I've already seen.[/color]
>
>Sorry, I meant:
>
> http://infohost.nmt.edu/tcc/help/pubs/tkinter/ (html)
> http://www.nmt.edu/tcc/help/pubs/tkinter.pdf (pdf of same)
>
>You've probably seen this manual already.[/color]
If not, I'll second the recommendation for the pdf. It's not complete, but
it's quite useful and pretty easy to use. Hm, seems to be updated since I
downloaded a copy, guess I'll grab the newest ;-) Hm2, it doubled in size!
The creation dates are
*** FILE tkinter.pdf ***
/CreationDate (D:200304161705 00)
*** FILE tkinter2.pdf ***
/CreationDate (D:200508031142 34)
So I guess it could double in 2 years 4 months. I'll have to look into it.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
Comment