Matching zero only once using RE

[GregM]

Hi,

I've looked at a lot of pages on the net and still can't seem to nail
this. Would someone more knowledgeable in regular expressions please
provide some help to point out what I'm doing wrong?

I am trying to see if a web page contains the exact text:
You have found 0 matches

But instead I seem to be matching all sorts of expected line like
You have found <a number up to 5 digits long with comma> matches
for example:
You have found 34 matches
You have found 189 matches
You have found 16,734 matches
You have found 1,706 matches
You have found 300 matches

The last 2 I thought I had eliminated but sadly it seems not the
examples above actually seem to match my expression below. :(

Here is what I'm doing:
zeromatch = []
SecondarySearch Term = 'You found (0){1} matches'
primarySearchTe rm = 'Looking for Something'
primarySearchTe rm2 = 'has been an error connecting'

# pagetext is all the body text on a web page.
# I'm using COM to drive MSIE and pagetext = doc.body.outerT ext

if (re.search(prim arySearchTerm, pagetext) or
re.search(prima rySearchTerm2, pagetext)):
failedlinks.app end(link)
elif (re.search(Seco ndarySearchTerm , pagetext)):
zeromatch.appen d(link)

I've tried other RE's be had even more spectacular failures any help
would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in Advance,
Greg Moore
Software Test
Shop.com

[Jaime Wyant]

Re: Matching zero only once using RE

On 7 Oct 2005 10:35:22 -0700, GregM <gregm@taming-tech.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> Hi,
>
> I've looked at a lot of pages on the net and still can't seem to nail
> this. Would someone more knowledgeable in regular expressions please
> provide some help to point out what I'm doing wrong?
>
> I am trying to see if a web page contains the exact text:
> You have found 0 matches
>[/color]
Shouldn't your regular expression be "You have found 0 matches". If
you're looking for that exact string, then you should use that.

This works for me:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> s = "asdfasfdfs You have found 0 matches asdfasdfasdf"
>>> import re
>>> re.search("You have found 0 matches", s)[/color][/color][/color]
<_sre.SRE_Mat ch object at 0x00B21800>

ALso, it looks like your pattern is off. The pattern you use is given below...

SecondarySearch Term = 'You found (0){1} matches'

However, you state that you are looking for 'You have found 0 matches'

* Notice the 'have' in the string you are searching for and it's
absence in your search term ;)

HTH,
jw

[Benji York]

Re: Matching zero only once using RE

GregM wrote:[color=blue]
> I am trying to see if a web page contains the exact text:
> You have found 0 matches[/color]

It is unclear to me why you're using a regex at all. If you want to
find the *exact* text "You have found 0 matches" perhaps you should do
something like this:

if "You have found 0 matches" in pagetext:
print 'yes'
else:
print 'no'

--
Benji York

[Mike Meyer]

Re: Matching zero only once using RE

"GregM" <gregm@taming-tech.com> writes:[color=blue]
> I've looked at a lot of pages on the net and still can't seem to nail
> this. Would someone more knowledgeable in regular expressions please
> provide some help to point out what I'm doing wrong?
>
> I am trying to see if a web page contains the exact text:
> You have found 0 matches[/color]

Why in the gods names are you using an re for this? Just use in:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> pretext1 = 'This is some text with You have found 0 matches in it'
>>> pretext2 = 'This text should not match'
>>> 'You have found 0 matches' in pretext1[/color][/color][/color]
True[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> 'You have found 0 matches' in pretext2[/color][/color][/color]
False[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>>[/color][/color][/color]

I think it's time to form a Committee for the Prevention of Regular
Expression Abuse.

<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.or g> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.

[GregM]

Re: Matching zero only once using RE

Hi
thanks to all of you. Mike I like your committee idea. where can I
join? lol

Greg.

[Aahz]

Re: Matching zero only once using RE

In article <86ll15nri1.fsf @bhuda.mired.or g>, Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.or g> wrote:[color=blue]
>
>I think it's time to form a Committee for the Prevention of Regular
>Expression Abuse.[/color]

'Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use
regular expressions." Now they have two problems.' --Jamie Zawinski
--
Aahz (aahz@pythoncra ft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait
until you hire an amateur." --Red Adair

[Fredrik Lundh]

Re: Matching zero only once using RE

Mike Meyer wrote:
[color=blue]
> I think it's time to form a Committee for the Prevention of Regular
> Expression Abuse.[/color]

on the other hand, the RE engine uses a more advanced scanning
algorithm than string find, which means that constant RE:s can in
fact be faster under some circumstances (certain patterns, target
strings with lots of false partial matches, etc).

see "searching for literal text" on this page

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-August/007797.html

for some figures.

(things have improved since then, especially in 2.4. in 2.3, "in" was
also a lot slower than "find". and all three are still slower than they
have to be: http://online.effbot.org/2004_08_01_archive.htm#find2 )

</F>

[Tim Roberts]

Re: Matching zero only once using RE

Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.or g> wrote:[color=blue]
>
>I think it's time to form a Committee for the Prevention of Regular
>Expression Abuse.[/color]

As I learned from personal experience, this is a disease which one
contracts when moving to Python from Perl. Perl teaches you that the
entire world is a string, and every operation is a regular expression match
upon that string.
--
- Tim Roberts, timr@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.