threading.Thread vs. signal.signal

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jack Orenstein

    #1

    threading.Thread vs. signal.signal

    I'd like to create a program that invokes a function once a second,
    and terminates when the user types ctrl-c. So I created a signal
    handler, created a threading.Threa d which does the invocation every
    second, and started the thread. The signal handler seems to be
    ineffective. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? This is on Fedora FC4 and
    Python 2.4.1. The code appears below.

    If I do the while ... sleep in the main thread, then the signal
    handler works as expected. (This isn't really a satisfactory
    implementation because the function called every second might
    take a significant fraction of a second to execute.)

    Jack Orenstein


    import sys
    import signal
    import threading
    import datetime
    import time

    class metronome(threa ding.Thread):
    def __init__(self, interval, function):
    threading.Threa d.__init__(self )
    self.interval = interval
    self.function = function
    self.done = False

    def cancel(self):
    print '>>> cancel'
    self.done = True

    def run(self):
    while not self.done:
    time.sleep(self .interval)
    if self.done:
    print '>>> break!'
    break
    else:
    self.function()

    def ctrl_c_handler( signal, frame):
    print '>>> ctrl c'
    global t
    t.cancel()
    sys.stdout.clos e()
    sys.stderr.clos e()
    sys.exit(0)

    signal.signal(s ignal.SIGINT, ctrl_c_handler)

    def hello():
    print datetime.dateti me.now()

    t = metronome(1, hello)
    t.start()
Working...