trash talk

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • David Parker

    trash talk

    In an article about IBM's releasing Cloudscape to Apache,



    eWeek says:

    "The developer community for Cloudscape now consists of about 80 IBM
    developers, Rivot said. IBM of course anticipates that population will
    explode when the open-source community gets its hand on the code, but
    just because a product goes open source doesn't mean it will succeed, as
    can be witnessed by the failure of the PostgreSQL database to thrive
    under this model."

    It's amazing how much list activity there is for this "dead" database!
    ;-)

    - DAP
    =============== =============== =============== =========
    David Parker Tazz Networks (401) 709-5130



    ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
    TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddres sHere" to majordomo@postg resql.org)

  • Scott Marlowe

    #2
    Re: trash talk

    On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 13:30, David Parker wrote:[color=blue]
    > In an article about IBM's releasing Cloudscape to Apache,
    >
    > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1630856,00.asp
    >
    > eWeek says:
    >
    > "The developer community for Cloudscape now consists of about 80 IBM
    > developers, Rivot said. IBM of course anticipates that population will
    > explode when the open-source community gets its hand on the code, but
    > just because a product goes open source doesn't mean it will succeed, as
    > can be witnessed by the failure of the PostgreSQL database to thrive
    > under this model."
    >
    > It's amazing how much list activity there is for this "dead" database!
    > ;-)[/color]

    That's because he's a marketeer, not a developer or a sysadmin. He only
    understands market-speak.

    For him, thrive == grow visible market share, make me some money, let me
    buy myself an expensive bottle of wine.
    For us, thrive == grow user base, developer base, code base, knowledge
    base, let me buy a you a pizza.

    I.e. the people who use postgresql mostly love, the people who don't
    mostly haven't heard of it. No buzz, no hype. For people who rely on
    PostgreSQL to get the job done, this is not a disadvantage.




    ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
    TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

    Comment

    • Scott Ribe

      #3
      Re: trash talk

      > That's because he's a marketeer, not a developer or a sysadmin. He only[color=blue]
      > understands market-speak.[/color]

      No, I think he fully understands the relative position of PostgreSQL and its
      level of use. Think about it, why did he choose to disrespect this one
      particular open-source database out of all the ones available? Because in
      the context of that interview he could only squeeze in one such derogatory
      comment, and you can be sure he chose his target carefully. When somebody
      that highly placed in that large of an organization gives an interview, he
      doesn't usually make careless unplanned comments.

      I feel good that PostgreSQL has gotten so much attention from IBM--it's a
      real sign of accomplishment ;-)


      --
      Scott Ribe
      scott_ribe@kill erbytes.com

      (303) 665-7007 voice


      ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
      TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

      Comment

      • Bruce Momjian

        #4
        Re: trash talk

        Scott Marlowe wrote:[color=blue]
        > On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 13:30, David Parker wrote:[color=green]
        > > In an article about IBM's releasing Cloudscape to Apache,
        > >
        > > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1630856,00.asp
        > >
        > > eWeek says:
        > >
        > > "The developer community for Cloudscape now consists of about 80 IBM
        > > developers, Rivot said. IBM of course anticipates that population will
        > > explode when the open-source community gets its hand on the code, but
        > > just because a product goes open source doesn't mean it will succeed, as
        > > can be witnessed by the failure of the PostgreSQL database to thrive
        > > under this model."
        > >
        > > It's amazing how much list activity there is for this "dead" database!
        > > ;-)[/color]
        >
        > That's because he's a marketeer, not a developer or a sysadmin. He only
        > understands market-speak.
        >
        > For him, thrive == grow visible market share, make me some money, let me
        > buy myself an expensive bottle of wine.
        > For us, thrive == grow user base, developer base, code base, knowledge
        > base, let me buy a you a pizza.
        >
        > I.e. the people who use postgresql mostly love, the people who don't
        > mostly haven't heard of it. No buzz, no hype. For people who rely on
        > PostgreSQL to get the job done, this is not a disadvantage.[/color]

        I think he meant to say SAPDB.

        --
        Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
        pgman@candle.ph a.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
        + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
        + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

        ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
        TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

        Comment

        • Mike Mascari

          #5
          Re: trash talk

          Scott Ribe wrote:
          [color=blue][color=green]
          >>That's because he's a marketeer, not a developer or a sysadmin. He only
          >>understands market-speak.[/color]
          >
          >
          > No, I think he fully understands the relative position of PostgreSQL and its
          > level of use. Think about it, why did he choose to disrespect this one
          > particular open-source database out of all the ones available? Because in
          > the context of that interview he could only squeeze in one such derogatory
          > comment, and you can be sure he chose his target carefully. When somebody
          > that highly placed in that large of an organization gives an interview, he
          > doesn't usually make careless unplanned comments.
          >
          > I feel good that PostgreSQL has gotten so much attention from IBM--it's a
          > real sign of accomplishment ;-)[/color]

          I could be reading it incorrectly, but the paragraph was outside any
          attributed quote:

          ---
          The developer community for Cloudscape now consists of about 80 IBM
          developers, Rivot said. IBM of course anticipates that population
          will explode when the open-source community gets its hand on the
          code, but just because a product goes open source doesn't mean it
          will succeed, as can be witnessed by the failure of the PostgreSQL
          database to thrive under this model.
          ---

          Therefore, the author, Lisa Vass, could well have formulated this
          assertion of failure from the deep inner recesses of her own mind.

          I also find the other mention of PostgreSQL, which was an
          attributable quote, odd:

          ---
          Rivot agreed. "Some of the other ones [such as PostgreSQL], they've
          thrown it over the wall to see where it sticks," Rivot said. "In
          this case, there is a groundswell [of support], and that caused us
          to look and pay attention to it. The usage will continue to grow."
          ---

          What's the point of the square-brackets? Hmm...

          Mike Mascari
















          [color=blue]
          >
          >[/color]



          ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
          TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

          Comment

          • Scott Ribe

            #6
            Re: trash talk

            > I could be reading it incorrectly, but the paragraph was outside any[color=blue]
            > attributed quote:[/color]

            You are correct that the specific comment about pg not thriving was outside
            any quotes. However, given the totality of the references to pg I think it
            was a summary of some things Rivot said. As for the point of the square
            brackets, those are an editorial device to clarify a quote based on the
            omitted context. In other words, for this example they mean that Rivot was
            discussing PostgreSQL and that would have been made clear had they provided
            a complete transcript.

            Of course it is possible that the author misquoted Rivot, or misinterpreted
            which database he was referring to.


            --
            Scott Ribe
            scott_ribe@kill erbytes.com

            (303) 665-7007 voice


            ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
            TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
            joining column's datatypes do not match

            Comment

            • Dave Cramer

              #7
              Re: trash talk

              Interesting, IBM is saying that the code is worth 85M dollars!

              On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 00:19, Scott Ribe wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
              > > I could be reading it incorrectly, but the paragraph was outside any
              > > attributed quote:[/color]
              >
              > You are correct that the specific comment about pg not thriving was outside
              > any quotes. However, given the totality of the references to pg I think it
              > was a summary of some things Rivot said. As for the point of the square
              > brackets, those are an editorial device to clarify a quote based on the
              > omitted context. In other words, for this example they mean that Rivot was
              > discussing PostgreSQL and that would have been made clear had they provided
              > a complete transcript.
              >
              > Of course it is possible that the author misquoted Rivot, or misinterpreted
              > which database he was referring to.[/color]
              --
              Dave Cramer
              519 939 0336
              ICQ # 14675561


              ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
              TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
              joining column's datatypes do not match

              Comment

              • Scott Ribe

                #8
                Re: trash talk

                > Interesting, IBM is saying that the code is worth 85M dollars!

                Well... Actually they're saying: "we paid $85M for it, now we're giving it
                away, aren't we generous?"


                --
                Scott Ribe
                scott_ribe@kill erbytes.com

                (303) 665-7007 voice


                ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
                TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
                (send "unregister YourEmailAddres sHere" to majordomo@postg resql.org)

                Comment

                • Greg Stark

                  #9
                  Re: trash talk


                  "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest .net> writes:
                  [color=blue]
                  > This is less than a year after the last major release, 7.3.0 by the way.[/color]

                  Uhm. Wasn't 7.4 the last major release?

                  --
                  greg


                  ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
                  TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?



                  Comment

                  • Scott Marlowe

                    #10
                    Re: trash talk

                    On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 12:06, Greg Stark wrote:[color=blue]
                    > "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@qwest .net> writes:
                    >[color=green]
                    > > This is less than a year after the last major release, 7.3.0 by the way.[/color]
                    >
                    > Uhm. Wasn't 7.4 the last major release?[/color]

                    Yeah, that was a typo. Thanks for the catch.


                    ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
                    TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

                    Comment

                    • Mike Mascari

                      #11
                      Re: trash talk

                      Scott Marlowe wrote:[color=blue]
                      > On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 09:01, Scott Ribe wrote:
                      >[color=green][color=darkred]
                      >>> Interesting, IBM is saying that the code is worth 85M
                      >>> dollars![/color]
                      >>
                      >> Well... Actually they're saying: "we paid $85M for it, now
                      >> we're giving it away, aren't we generous?"[/color]
                      >
                      >
                      > Hey guys, after reading the article, I began a dialog with Lisa
                      > Vaas, the author, and we had quite a civil discourse over it.[/color]

                      Her continued use of the phrase "the company" still makes me think
                      she doesn't understand (asterisks added by me):

                      "You're right, I didn't understand that. I appreciate the
                      explanation. *It* is markedly different from *other companies* in
                      *its* structure. I always contact Geoff Davidson, CEO of PostgreSQL
                      Inc., with the understanding that there basically was a somewhat
                      standard company-like structure behind the technology. I can see
                      that I assumed wrong, and I'll proceed differently in my reporting
                      on *the company* henceforth. At the very least, I'll get people to
                      explain more fully their dismissal of PostgreSQL so I understand how
                      it's perceived, and I'll try to correct my own perception.

                      Thanks again, and thanks of course for the level of refreshingly
                      civil discourse that is characteristic of the PostgreSQL community.

                      All my best, Lisa"

                      Oh, well.

                      Mike Mascari





                      ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
                      TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

                      Comment

                      Working...