Multiple databases on seperate drives/file systems?

[Jim Seymour]

Re: Multiple databases on seperate drives/file systems?

"Scot L. Harris" <webid@cfl.rr.c om> wrote:[color=blue]
>[/color]
[snip][color=blue]
>
> Any more ideas before I have to go hacking on the startup script?[/color]

Not a clue, Scot. Sorry.

Jim

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

[Jim Seymour]

Re: Multiple databases on seperate drives/file systems?

"Scot L. Harris" <webid@cfl.rr.c om> wrote:[color=blue]
>[/color]
[snip][color=blue]
>
> Any more ideas before I have to go hacking on the startup script?[/color]

Not a clue, Scot. Sorry.

Jim

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

[Mike Castle]

Re: Multiple databases on seperate drives/file systems?

In article <20754.10867908 15@sss.pgh.pa.u s>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa .us> wrote:[color=blue]
>Depends which startup script you are using. I know that up till
>recently the Red Hat init script did
>
> su -l postgres -s /bin/sh -c "pg_ctl start ..."
>
>and because it forced /bin/sh, anything you might have put in say
>~postgres/.bash_profile wouldn't get read. You can just take out
>that -s switch though.[/color]


Actually, I think it's that bash is broken (well, it is if you ask me, but
not if you ask Chet Ramey). At least it was circa 2001 when I last looked
at this issue.

I had to ask -l to get my init scripts to work (that is, to source .profile
when started with su - ).

mrc
--
Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netc om.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings