Class variable interpolation

[August Karlstrom]

Hi,

Does anyone know the correct syntax to interpolate a class variable, $x
say, inside a string? I tried

"{self::$x} "

but it produces the string

{self::x}


August

[Rik Wasmus]

Re: Class variable interpolation

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:58:40 +0100, August Karlstrom
<fusionfile@gma il.comwrote:

Hi,
>
Does anyone know the correct syntax to interpolate a class variable, $x
say, inside a string? I tried
>
"{self::$x} "
>
but it produces the string
>
{self::x}

Here it will produce '{self::}', and a notice $x isn't set.
AFAIK, with static variables, one has the same 'problem' as with
constants: no interpolation possible, just use temporary variables or
concatenation.
--
Rik

[August Karlstrom]

Re: Class variable interpolation

Rik Wasmus wrote:

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:58:40 +0100, August Karlstrom
<fusionfile@gma il.comwrote:
>

>Hi,
>>
>Does anyone know the correct syntax to interpolate a class variable,
>$x say, inside a string? I tried
>>
>"{self::$x} "
>>
>but it produces the string
>>
>{self::x}

>
Here it will produce '{self::}', and a notice $x isn't set.
AFAIK, with static variables, one has the same 'problem' as with
constants: no interpolation possible,

If that is the case it was probably overlooked by the language
developers. I see no reason why static variables could not be
interpolated with the syntax above.

just use temporary variables or concatenation.

Right, but it is kind of clumsy.


August

[Curtis]

Re: Class variable interpolation

August Karlstrom wrote:

Rik Wasmus wrote:

>On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:58:40 +0100, August Karlstrom
><fusionfile@gm ail.comwrote:
>>

>>Hi,
>>>
>>Does anyone know the correct syntax to interpolate a class variable,
>>$x say, inside a string? I tried
>>>
>>"{self::$x} "
>>>
>>but it produces the string
>>>
>>{self::x}

>>
>Here it will produce '{self::}', and a notice $x isn't set.
>AFAIK, with static variables, one has the same 'problem' as with
>constants: no interpolation possible,

>
If that is the case it was probably overlooked by the language
developers. I see no reason why static variables could not be
interpolated with the syntax above.
>

>just use temporary variables or concatenation.

>
Right, but it is kind of clumsy.
>

Using sprintf() and its ilk is also viable, and, IMO, can be easier on
the eyes than relying on variable interpolation, anyway.

August

--
Curtis
$eMail = str_replace('si g.invalid', 'gmail.com', $from);

[August Karlstrom]

Re: Class variable interpolation

Curtis wrote:

Using sprintf() and its ilk is also viable, and, IMO, can be easier on
the eyes than relying on variable interpolation, anyway.

For shorter strings, yes, but probably not with 50 lines of HTML in a
heredoc.


August

[Jessica Griego]

Re: Class variable interpolation


"August Karlstrom" <fusionfile@gma il.comwrote in message
news:ge8e9n$ur2 $1@aioe.org...

Curtis wrote:

>Using sprintf() and its ilk is also viable, and, IMO, can be easier on
>the eyes than relying on variable interpolation, anyway.

>
For shorter strings, yes, but probably not with 50 lines of HTML in a
heredoc.

A heredoc is your case for code legibility? :^)