A good editor

[Geoff Berrow]

Re: A good editor

I noticed that Message-ID: <40D862A9.60000 04@here.org> from bonehead
contained the following:
[color=blue]
>And if money *does* matter, EditPlus2 is free *and* it's a combination
>code editor/ftp tool.[/color]

FSVO free.

--
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/

[R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah]

Re: A good editor

bonehead <sendmenospam@h ere.org> wrote in message news:<40D862A9. 6000004@here.or g>...
<snip>[color=blue]
> And if money *does* matter, EditPlus2 is free[/color]

From when?
[color=blue]
> *and* it's a combination
> code editor/ftp tool.[/color]

--
| Just another PHP saint |
Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com

[Andrzej Bednarczyk]

Re: A good editor

> I like homesite. It is a html editor at heart.

true
[color=blue]
> When you write php
> you are writing php inside a html page. So it makes sense to me.[/color]

not true...
it depends HOW you write - and also, how BIG is the project you write. For a
single-page project - sure, PHP inside HTML is the best solution.

but if we are talking about bigger projects - with separeted presentation &
logic levels (like logic classes + presentation basen on UI classes which
use some template engine) - then php inside htmt isn't what you really want
to do ;-)

I would say - yes, if you plan to be PHP developper and in the same time
HTML-coder - then homesite (win) or quanta (linux) is the right choose.

But if you are going work only in php (or occasionaly html) then KDevelop
(linux) & Zend Studio (win) are the best what exists.

The only thing I DO NOT recommend is zend studio on linux - it's written
100% in java and therefore it's sloooooow and had some problems with files
which are > several KB... hmm... on the other hand the window-version is
nothing but GREAT!

cheers
a