Classes in files

[deciacco]

I have the following class structure and I'm wonder how best to put this
in seperate files/folders instead of all in one file. Thanks!

class A{
}
class A1 extends A{
}
class A2 extends A{
}
class A3 extends A{
}
class A1a extends A1{
}
class A1b extends A1{
}
class A1c extends A1{
}
class A2a extends A2{
}

[Willem Bogaerts]

Re: Classes in files

I have the following class structure and I'm wonder how best to put this

>
in seperate files/folders instead of all in one file. Thanks!

It does not really matter if you put each class in its own file or if
you group them in library files. It is just a matter of personal taste.

What I really avoid is mixing "free running" code with class or function
definitions. A file should either define something or run something. Not
both.

--
Willem Bogaerts

Application smith
Kratz B.V.

http://www.kratz.nl/

[Curtis]

Re: Classes in files

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:52:49 -0800, Willem Bogaerts
<w.bogaerts@kra tz.maardanzonde rditstuk.nlwrot e:

>I have the following class structure and I'm wonder how best to put this
>>
>in seperate files/folders instead of all in one file. Thanks!

>
It does not really matter if you put each class in its own file or if
you group them in library files. It is just a matter of personal taste.
>
What I really avoid is mixing "free running" code with class or function
definitions. A file should either define something or run something. Not
both.
>

That's a good point you make there.

It might be fine to keep all the sub classes in one file, if they're small
enough. Usually, it'd be better to minimize the amount of require and/or
include constructs used.

--
Curtis

[Rik]

Re: Classes in files

Curtis <zer0dyer@veriz on.netwrote:

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:52:49 -0800, Willem Bogaerts
<w.bogaerts@kra tz.maardanzonde rditstuk.nlwrot e:
>

>>I have the following class structure and I'm wonder how best to put
>>this
>>>
>>in seperate files/folders instead of all in one file. Thanks!

>>
>It does not really matter if you put each class in its own file or if
>you group them in library files. It is just a matter of personal taste.
>>
>What I really avoid is mixing "free running" code with class or function
>definitions. A file should either define something or run something. Not
>both.
>>

>
That's a good point you make there.
>
It might be fine to keep all the sub classes in one file, if they're
small enough. Usually, it'd be better to minimize the amount of require
and/or include constructs used.

When on PHP5:

http://nl2.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.autoload.php

--
Rik Wasmus