Re: serving xhtml with php
Message-ID: <1153501424.097 910.75160@s13g2 000cwa.googlegr oups.comfrom
Colin contained the following:
Better technology? XHTML transitional?
I think you are way off track here.
--
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
Message-ID: <1153501424.097 910.75160@s13g2 000cwa.googlegr oups.comfrom
Colin contained the following:
>If i had to pick one to go with, i'd chose XHTML (Transitional,
>personally, at this time...)
>
>I'd rather be working with the better technology and have to deal with
>'the browser issue' than push HTML 4.01 to the bitter end of its
>usefulness/abilities.
>personally, at this time...)
>
>I'd rather be working with the better technology and have to deal with
>'the browser issue' than push HTML 4.01 to the bitter end of its
>usefulness/abilities.
Better technology? XHTML transitional?
I think you are way off track here.
--
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
Comment