Why no .Net linker?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jim Hubbard

    Why no .Net linker?

    Linkers have been around forever.......w hy can't we link all needed portions
    of the .Net framework into a single EXE?

    Although the apps would be a bit larger, this would eliminate the
    possibility of Microsoft "fixes" breaking applications and of new .Net
    versions breaking older ones. And, you wouldn't have to worry about which
    version of .Net (if any) the end user had installed.

    Your app would then function just as expected unless fundamental changes
    were made to the OS (and that's something every language is susceptible to).

    I would opt for a larger app with greater reach over a smaller EXE with
    limited reach any day.

    Jim Hubbard


  • pm

    #2
    RE: Why no .Net linker?

    At least one authoritative answer can be found at



    "Jim Hubbard" wrote:
    [color=blue]
    > Linkers have been around forever.......w hy can't we link all needed portions
    > of the .Net framework into a single EXE?
    >
    > Although the apps would be a bit larger, this would eliminate the
    > possibility of Microsoft "fixes" breaking applications and of new .Net
    > versions breaking older ones. And, you wouldn't have to worry about which
    > version of .Net (if any) the end user had installed.
    >
    > Your app would then function just as expected unless fundamental changes
    > were made to the OS (and that's something every language is susceptible to).
    >
    > I would opt for a larger app with greater reach over a smaller EXE with
    > limited reach any day.
    >
    > Jim Hubbard
    >
    >
    >[/color]

    Comment

    Working...