.NET new executable

[Scott M.]

Re: .NET new executable

If you want to use MySQL, it can be less expensive. If you want to use an
Access database (only for small apps. that don't require rigorous
performance demands), it's free.


"Leon Mayne" <leon@rmv_me.mv ps.orgwrote in message
news:F06092D9-CE62-46AA-86F2-A99309ADA34F@mi crosoft.com...

"Scott M." <smar@nospam.no spamwrote in message
news:%23gOHmO6V IHA.4448@TK2MSF TNGP03.phx.gbl. ..

>I'd say forget about emailing application's and results around. You are
>just asking for trouble.

>
True, but straight ASP.NET hosting can be quite cheap. Add a SQL Server
database into the equasion and you can look at doubling your costs.

[Leon Mayne]

Re: .NET new executable

"Scott M." <smar@nospam.no spamwrote in message
news:uDw9ojFWIH A.3556@TK2MSFTN GP02.phx.gbl...

If you want to use MySQL, it can be less expensive.

Yes, in fact sometimes free.

If you want to use an Access database

Ew!

[Scott M.]

Re: .NET new executable

>If you want to use an Access database

>
Ew!

For small scale apps. with few users, this solution deserves a second look.
I always felt the same way as you about this until Access 2003, which gave
this scenario a better chance at actually working.

For the type of app. that the OP is talking about, this may just be the best
solution.