"Migration" from IDREFS to an XML-Schema expression

[Rabe]

Hi all,

here a little brain-twister (starting to spoil my weekend
if I do not find a solution ... ;-) )

What I want to do is to find a XML-Schema expression that builds
a grammar for the following XML document (fragment):

<grouping_docum ent>
<app_list>
<app id="id1">Progra m 1</app>
<app id="id2">Progra m 2</app>
<app id="id3">Progra m 3</app>
<!-- etc. -->
</app_list>

<grouping app_ref="id1 id3">
<!-- stuff for the referenced apps -->
</grouping>

<grouping app_ref="id2">
<!-- stuff for the referenced apps -->
</grouping>
</grouping_docume nt>


The <grouping_docum ent> describes some information that may be valid for
one or more applications. So it starts with a list of application definitions
whereas the key issue is that only the listed ids are allowed to appear as
values of attribute app_ref in the element <grouping>.

A valid DTD for this is

<!DOCTYPE grouping_docume nt [
<!ELEMENT grouping_docume nt ( app_list, grouping+ )>

<!ELEMENT app_list (app+)>
<!ELEMENT app (#PCDATA)>
<!ATTLIST app id ID #REQUIRED>

<!-- etc. -->

<!ELEMENT grouping (grouping_eleme nt+)>
<!ATTLIST grouping app_ref IDREFS #REQUIRED>

<!-- etc. -->
]>


But how to express these ID/IDREFS expressions in suitable in XML-Schema syntax?
(I do not have a problem with the standard key/keyref expressions. Where I'm
failing is the formulation of a list of references as value of a simple attribute.)

Here's what I have tried:

<xsd:complexTyp e name="GroupingT ype">
<xsd:sequence >
<xsd:element name="app_list" type="AppListTy pe">
<xsd:key name="AppKey">
<xsd:selector xpath="app"/>
<xsd:field xpath="@id"/>
</xsd:key>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="grouping" type="GroupingT ype"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType >

<!-- etc. -->

<complexType name="GroupingT ype">
<sequence>
<element name="grouping_ element">
<!-- etc. -->
</element>
</sequence>

<attribute name="id">
<simpleType name="AppIdList ">
<list itemType="strin g"/>
</simpleType>
<keyref name="aref" refer="jrn:AppK ey">
<field xpath="@app_id"/>
</keyref>
</attribute>
</complexType>


It's wrong, I know ...

But perhaps someone has a little tip for me?

Many thanks for your efforts!
Rabe

[Martin Honnen]

Re: &quot;Migration &quot; from IDREFS to an XML-Schema expression



Rabe wrote:

[color=blue]
> here a little brain-twister (starting to spoil my weekend
> if I do not find a solution ... ;-) )
>
> What I want to do is to find a XML-Schema expression that builds
> a grammar for the following XML document (fragment):
>
> <grouping_docum ent>
> <app_list>
> <app id="id1">Progra m 1</app>
> <app id="id2">Progra m 2</app>
> <app id="id3">Progra m 3</app>
> <!-- etc. -->
> </app_list>
>
> <grouping app_ref="id1 id3">
> <!-- stuff for the referenced apps -->
> </grouping>
>
> <grouping app_ref="id2">
> <!-- stuff for the referenced apps -->
> </grouping>
> </grouping_docume nt>
>
>
> The <grouping_docum ent> describes some information that may be valid for
> one or more applications. So it starts with a list of application definitions
> whereas the key issue is that only the listed ids are allowed to appear as
> values of attribute app_ref in the element <grouping>.
>
> A valid DTD for this is
>
> <!DOCTYPE grouping_docume nt [
> <!ELEMENT grouping_docume nt ( app_list, grouping+ )>
>
> <!ELEMENT app_list (app+)>
> <!ELEMENT app (#PCDATA)>
> <!ATTLIST app id ID #REQUIRED>
>
> <!-- etc. -->
>
> <!ELEMENT grouping (grouping_eleme nt+)>
> <!ATTLIST grouping app_ref IDREFS #REQUIRED>[/color]

But a W3C XML schema allows you to define attributes of type xs:ID as
well as of type xs:IDREFS, see

http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#built-in-datatypes

http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#ID

http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#IDREFS

so you can simply type your attributes as you have typed them in the DTD.

--

Martin Honnen

http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

[R. B.]

Re: &quot;Migration &quot; from IDREFS to an XML-Schema expression

Hi,

thanks for your answer, I think it would (will!) work. (I know that
these types are valid in schema definitions too but I actually didn't
have the idea to use them ... :-)) )

But nevertheless there must be a solution to express ID/IDREFS in schema
syntax too, don't you think so?

As far as I know ID declarations bring up the problem that they are
global all over the document. So if I have a lot of ID declarations in
different elements how can I be sure that I'm referencing always the
right type of id?

When I expand my example with a list

<resource_lis t>
<resource id="res_id1"/>
<resource id="res_id2"/>
<resource id="res_id3"/>
</resource_list>

I will be able to reference a pretended application "res_id1" e.g.

<grouping app_ref="id1 res_id1">
<!-- stuff for the referenced apps -->
</grouping>

which is syntactically correct but semantically nonsense ...

Hmm ...

But your tip helped me a lot - I was already thinking about changing the
structure of my instance document ...

Bye Rabe



*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

[Martin Honnen]

Re: &quot;Migration &quot; from IDREFS to an XML-Schema expression



R. B. wrote:

[color=blue]
> thanks for your answer, I think it would (will!) work. (I know that
> these types are valid in schema definitions too but I actually didn't
> have the idea to use them ... :-)) )
>
> But nevertheless there must be a solution to express ID/IDREFS in schema
> syntax too, don't you think so?[/color]

I told you to use the xs:ID and xs:IDREFS types, those are schema types,
so I am not sure why you ask for schema syntax, if you use
<xs:attribute name="id" type="xs:ID" />
then that is schema syntax and that is all I suggested to do.

--

Martin Honnen

http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/