performance of XslTransform vs XslCompiledTransform

[Andy Fish]

Hi,

From reading the documentation, I get the impression that
XslCompiledTran sform should be faster than XslTransform

on my test with a large complex document and a large complex XSLT, the
transform took 4 minutes with XslTransform but 7 minutes with
XslCompiledTran sform.

However, with the same stylesheet on another large complex document, the
time dropped from 4 minutes with XslTransform to just 45 seconds with
XslCompiledTran sform.

any clues as to what might cause this difference in performance? is one of
my results exceptional?

this sort of process is typical in my application so I'd like to get the
best overall performance.

TIA

Andy

[Martin Honnen]

Re: performance of XslTransform vs XslCompiledTran sform

Andy Fish wrote:

From reading the documentation, I get the impression that
XslCompiledTran sform should be faster than XslTransform
>
on my test with a large complex document and a large complex XSLT, the
transform took 4 minutes with XslTransform but 7 minutes with
XslCompiledTran sform.
>
However, with the same stylesheet on another large complex document, the
time dropped from 4 minutes with XslTransform to just 45 seconds with
XslCompiledTran sform.
>
any clues as to what might cause this difference in performance? is one of
my results exceptional?

When you call the Load method then XslCompiledTran sform compiles the
XSLT stylesheet to MSIL. That often takes longer than loading with
XslTransform. On the other hand executing the Transform method, in
particular several times with a compiled stylesheet, should perform much
better with XslCompiledTran sform.
See <http://blogs.msdn.com/antosha/archive/2006/07/24/677560.aspxfor
some detailed comparison.
--

Martin Honnen --- MVP XML

http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

[Andy Fish]

Re: performance of XslTransform vs XslCompiledTran sform

"Martin Honnen" <mahotrash@yaho o.dewrote in message
news:eT7EwOhnHH A.208@TK2MSFTNG P05.phx.gbl...

Andy Fish wrote:
>

>From reading the documentation, I get the impression that
>XslCompiledTra nsform should be faster than XslTransform
>>
>on my test with a large complex document and a large complex XSLT, the
>transform took 4 minutes with XslTransform but 7 minutes with
>XslCompiledTra nsform.
>>
>However, with the same stylesheet on another large complex document, the
>time dropped from 4 minutes with XslTransform to just 45 seconds with
>XslCompiledTra nsform.
>>
>any clues as to what might cause this difference in performance? is one
>of my results exceptional?

>
When you call the Load method then XslCompiledTran sform compiles the XSLT
stylesheet to MSIL. That often takes longer than loading with
XslTransform. On the other hand executing the Transform method, in
particular several times with a compiled stylesheet, should perform much
better with XslCompiledTran sform.
See <http://blogs.msdn.com/antosha/archive/2006/07/24/677560.aspxfor
some detailed comparison.

Thanks for the quick response Martin. I have tried running the same compiled
transformation against the document twice and it was not appreciably quicker
the second time.

I had seen your link and several other related articles and noticed that
they usually put their timings in milliseconds whereas mine are in minutes
(!!), so I wasn't expecting the JIT overhead to be that significant. note
that smaller documents run in a couple of seconds with the same transform.

Andy

--
>
Martin Honnen --- MVP XML
http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

[=?Utf-8?B?QW50b24gTGFwb3Vub3Y=?=]

Re: performance of XslTransform vs XslCompiledTran sform

Hello Andy,

The best way to report a bug or a performance issue in System.Xml is to file
it at http://connect.microsoft.com/ and attach simplified repro files. If you
have any issues with Microsoft Connect site, you may send repro files to me
(my email is here: http://antosha.com/workemail.gif), and I will file it for
you.

Thank you for your feedback!
-Anton Lapounov