[COM+] and ADO.NET

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Oriane

    #1

    [COM+] and ADO.NET

    Hi there,

    any hint to help me making the choice between COM+ and ADO.NET to connect to
    at least two Oracle databases ?

    Thanks


  • Michael Nemtsev

    #2
    Re: [COM+] and ADO.NET

    Hello Oriane,

    Could your describe how u use these techniques for your task?

    Oany hint to help me making the choice between COM+ and ADO.NET to
    Oconnect to at least two Oracle databases ?

    ---
    WBR, Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP].
    My blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
    Team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/

    "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
    miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo


    Comment

    • Oriane

      #3
      Re: [COM+] and ADO.NET


      "Michael Nemtsev" <nemtsev@msn.co ma écrit dans le message de news:
      a279a63a3e02478 c922632cffabf9@ ms...icrosof t.com...
      Hello Oriane,
      >
      Could your describe how u use these techniques for your task?
      I'm afrait not. The architect is gone and he hasn' left any docs. I don't
      have the time to dig into the code, but I know he preferred to connect to
      Oracle with COM+.

      Thanks


      Comment

      • Michael Nemtsev

        #4
        Re: [COM+] and ADO.NET

        Hello Oriane,

        COM+ has nothing common in the way of using with DB, it's just the set of
        services.

        Probably arch wanna create COM+ services (not Remoting and WebServices) to
        work with DB, so ADO.net isn't excluded from this scheme. U can use it within
        the COM+

        O"Michael Nemtsev" <nemtsev@msn.co ma écrit dans le message de news:
        Oa279a63a3e02478 c922632cffabf9@ ms...icrosof t.com...
        O>
        >Hello Oriane,
        >>
        >Could your describe how u use these techniques for your task?
        >>
        OI'm afrait not. The architect is gone and he hasn' left any docs. I
        Odon't have the time to dig into the code, but I know he preferred to
        Oconnect to Oracle with COM+.
        O>
        OThanks
        O>
        ---
        WBR, Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP].
        My blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
        Team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/

        "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
        miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo


        Comment

        • Oriane

          #5
          Re: [COM+] and ADO.NET


          "Michael Nemtsev" <nemtsev@msn.co ma écrit dans le message de news:
          a279a63a3e02528 c9226688521c4b@ ms...icrosof t.com...
          Hello Oriane,
          >
          COM+ has nothing common in the way of using with DB, it's just the set of
          services.
          I think that COM+ includes a transaction manager. So it deals with database
          connections isnt it ?


          Comment

          • Michael Nemtsev

            #6
            Re: [COM+] and ADO.NET

            Hello Oriane,
            >COM+ has nothing common in the way of using with DB, it's just the
            >set of services.
            >>
            OI think that COM+ includes a transaction manager. So it deals with
            Odatabase connections isnt it ?

            Yep, the same as the ADO.net deals with it.
            It's not the sound case to use COM+

            read there http://groups.google.com/group/micro...68f0568ab5a7d8
            about comparing ES vs ADO.NEt transactions

            ---
            WBR, Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP].
            My blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
            Team blog: http://devkids.blogspot.com/

            "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
            miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo


            Comment

            • Oriane

              #7
              Re: [COM+] and ADO.NET

              OK
              Thanks a lot :-)


              Comment

              Working...