Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Markus Klein

    Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)

    Hello,

    Does .Net 3.0 offering the same possibilities like Windows API?

    is .NET 3.0 going to replace the win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?

    No Access anymore to win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?


    Greets Markus

  • Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\)

    #2
    Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)

    Not completely. It was a glorious goal, but some of the WinAPI still exists
    under Vista.

    --
    Gregory A. Beamer
    MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA


    *************** *************** *************** ****
    Think outside of the box!
    *************** *************** *************** ****
    "Markus Klein" <wushh@web.dewr ote in message
    news:1160947993 .555810.26110@b 28g2000cwb.goog legroups.com...
    Hello,
    >
    Does .Net 3.0 offering the same possibilities like Windows API?
    >
    is .NET 3.0 going to replace the win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
    >
    No Access anymore to win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
    >
    >
    Greets Markus
    >

    Comment

    • Michael Nemtsev

      #3
      Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)

      Hello Markus,

      WinAPI is too big to be completly replaced by .NET
      ..NET only covers some (most used/popular) parts of API, and for some cases
      you need to use Platfrom Invoke to call you WinAPI functions to get the required
      functionality

      MKHello,
      MK>
      MKDoes .Net 3.0 offering the same possibilities like Windows API?
      MK>
      MKis .NET 3.0 going to replace the win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
      MK>
      MKNo Access anymore to win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
      MK>
      MKGreets Markus
      MK>
      ---
      WBR,
      Michael Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

      "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
      cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche



      Comment

      • Markus Klein

        #4
        Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)

        Thanks for your Answer.
        Will be the WinApi in Vista diffrend?


        Michael Nemtsev schrieb:
        Hello Markus,
        >
        WinAPI is too big to be completly replaced by .NET
        .NET only covers some (most used/popular) parts of API, and for some cases
        you need to use Platfrom Invoke to call you WinAPI functions to get the required
        functionality
        >
        MKHello,
        MK>
        MKDoes .Net 3.0 offering the same possibilities like Windows API?
        MK>
        MKis .NET 3.0 going to replace the win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
        MK>
        MKNo Access anymore to win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
        MK>
        MKGreets Markus
        MK>
        ---
        WBR,
        Michael Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
        >
        "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
        cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche

        Comment

        • Michael Nemtsev

          #5
          Re: Windows API vs. DotNet 3.0 (WinFX)

          Hello Markus,

          It will be extended

          MKThanks for your Answer.
          MKWill be the WinApi in Vista diffrend?
          MKMichael Nemtsev schrieb:
          MK>
          >Hello Markus,
          >>
          >WinAPI is too big to be completly replaced by .NET
          >.NET only covers some (most used/popular) parts of API, and for some
          >cases
          >you need to use Platfrom Invoke to call you WinAPI functions to get
          >the required
          >functionalit y
          >MKHello,
          >MK>
          >MKDoes .Net 3.0 offering the same possibilities like Windows API?
          >MK>
          >MKis .NET 3.0 going to replace the win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
          >MK>
          >MKNo Access anymore to win32-api in Vista/Longhorn?
          >MK>
          >MKGreets Markus
          >MK>
          >---
          >WBR,
          >Michael Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
          >"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents
          >do not cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche
          >>
          ---
          WBR,
          Michael Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour

          "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not
          cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche


          Comment

          Working...