.Net minimum Hardware requirements.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fred

    .Net minimum Hardware requirements.

    I came across this link on the MS site as a refrence for the hardware
    requirements for .NET Enterprise Architect. Are MS Smoking Something, I have
    been developing in .Net for a while and I honestly cant see how such
    under-specked hardware can be used. Anyone know where I can get a REAL WORLD
    refrence for the .NET enviroment ?



  • Guest's Avatar

    #2
    Re: .Net minimum Hardware requirements.

    Minimum hardware requirements would be.

    1 x PC
    1 x OS
    1 x CLR



    "fred" <fred@fred.fred > wrote in message
    news:%23xPXfie2 DHA.716@TK2MSFT NGP12.phx.gbl.. .[color=blue]
    > I came across this link on the MS site as a refrence for the hardware
    > requirements for .NET Enterprise Architect. Are MS Smoking Something, I[/color]
    have[color=blue]
    > been developing in .Net for a while and I honestly cant see how such
    > under-specked hardware can be used. Anyone know where I can get a REAL[/color]
    WORLD[color=blue]
    > refrence for the .NET enviroment ?
    >[/color]
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...quirements.asp[color=blue]
    >
    >[/color]


    Comment

    • Eric Gunnerson [MS]

      #3
      Re: .Net minimum Hardware requirements.

      We have lots of discussions about this internally, and it's hard to come up
      with one set of numbers that satisfy all the requirements, so the basic
      requirements end up applying only to very basic use, and the recommended
      values are a better place to start for most professional programmers.

      My advice is:

      * Windows XP
      * 1 GHz or better CPU
      * 512 MB of memory

      The memory amount is more important than the CPU speed. VS is acceptable on
      a 800 MHz system with 512MB, but going below that can make it a bit painful.
      Though I did write some real code on a 433 MHz system with 256MB this past
      fall.

      --
      Eric Gunnerson

      Visit the C# product team at http://www.csharp.net
      Eric's blog is at http://weblogs.asp.net/ericgu/

      This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
      "fred" <fred@fred.fred > wrote in message
      news:%23xPXfie2 DHA.716@TK2MSFT NGP12.phx.gbl.. .[color=blue]
      > I came across this link on the MS site as a refrence for the hardware
      > requirements for .NET Enterprise Architect. Are MS Smoking Something, I[/color]
      have[color=blue]
      > been developing in .Net for a while and I honestly cant see how such
      > under-specked hardware can be used. Anyone know where I can get a REAL[/color]
      WORLD[color=blue]
      > refrence for the .NET enviroment ?
      >[/color]
      http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...quirements.asp[color=blue]
      >
      >[/color]


      Comment

      • Thinkpad 600e

        #4
        Re: .Net minimum Hardware requirements.

        If one doesn't mind a really looooong compile time, I've been developing
        ..Net on a 366 Mhz 128 MB Thinkpad (6 GB HDD) without any problems
        whatsoever.
        As I use this machine at home, only for Sandbox/trial&error purposes, I'm
        glad I didn't go overboard investing in new hardware to fit MS
        reccomendations .... could've burnt quite a hole in my pocket.
        Hope this info helps those who R at the crossroads.

        "Eric Gunnerson [MS]" <ericgu@online. microsoft.com> wrote in message
        news:OJb05Dh2DH A.1744@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
        > We have lots of discussions about this internally, and it's hard to come[/color]
        up[color=blue]
        > with one set of numbers that satisfy all the requirements, so the basic
        > requirements end up applying only to very basic use, and the recommended
        > values are a better place to start for most professional programmers.
        >
        > My advice is:
        >
        > * Windows XP
        > * 1 GHz or better CPU
        > * 512 MB of memory
        >
        > The memory amount is more important than the CPU speed. VS is acceptable[/color]
        on[color=blue]
        > a 800 MHz system with 512MB, but going below that can make it a bit[/color]
        painful.[color=blue]
        > Though I did write some real code on a 433 MHz system with 256MB this past
        > fall.
        >
        > --
        > Eric Gunnerson
        >
        > Visit the C# product team at http://www.csharp.net
        > Eric's blog is at http://weblogs.asp.net/ericgu/
        >
        > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no[/color]
        rights.[color=blue]
        > "fred" <fred@fred.fred > wrote in message
        > news:%23xPXfie2 DHA.716@TK2MSFT NGP12.phx.gbl.. .[color=green]
        > > I came across this link on the MS site as a refrence for the hardware
        > > requirements for .NET Enterprise Architect. Are MS Smoking Something, I[/color]
        > have[color=green]
        > > been developing in .Net for a while and I honestly cant see how such
        > > under-specked hardware can be used. Anyone know where I can get a REAL[/color]
        > WORLD[color=green]
        > > refrence for the .NET enviroment ?
        > >[/color]
        >[/color]

        ml/vxorivisualstud ionetsystemrequ irements.asp[color=blue][color=green]
        > >
        > >[/color]
        >
        >[/color]


        Comment

        Working...