Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

[Vortex Soft]

http://www.junglecreatures.com/

Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.




Notes:

VB, C# are CLS compliant
You can also use managed code with C++


Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long time.
For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new deobfuscator.


Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll file.
Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source Code.
A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export them.


I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
nothing else but studying or playing.

[Nak]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

Fuck off!

"Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...[color=blue]
> http://www.junglecreatures.com/
>
> Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.
>
>
>
>
> Notes:
>
> VB, C# are CLS compliant
> You can also use managed code with C++
>
>
> Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long time.
> For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new deobfuscator.
>
>
> Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll file.
> Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source Code.
> A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export them.
>
>
> I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
> nothing else but studying or playing.
>[/color]

[Brian Henry]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

if VB.NET was good for nothing but studying and playing hows come some major
corporations run applications they created in VB.NET? Because of the way IL
is compiled symbols are going to be included... this happens with any IL
language such as Java. and what is stoping you from reverse engineering C++
code? if you can understand assembly and have some time on your hands you
can decompile it also in a sense


"Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...[color=blue]
> http://www.junglecreatures.com/
>
> Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.
>
>
>
>
> Notes:
>
> VB, C# are CLS compliant
> You can also use managed code with C++
>
>
> Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long time.
> For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new deobfuscator.
>
>
> Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll file.
> Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source Code.
> A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export them.
>
>
> I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
> nothing else but studying or playing.
>[/color]

[James]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

That link appears to be dead.


"Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...[color=blue]
> http://www.junglecreatures.com/
>
> Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.
>
>
>
>
> Notes:
>
> VB, C# are CLS compliant
> You can also use managed code with C++
>
>
> Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long time.
> For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new deobfuscator.
>
>
> Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll file.
> Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source Code.
> A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export them.
>
>
> I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
> nothing else but studying or playing.
>[/color]

[One Handed Man \( OHM - Terry Burns \)]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

You really dont know what you are talking about do you !



--

OHM ( Terry Burns )
. . . One-Handed-Man . . .
If U Need My Email ,Ask Me

Time flies when you don't know what you're doing

"Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...[color=blue]
> http://www.junglecreatures.com/
>
> Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.
>
>
>
>
> Notes:
>
> VB, C# are CLS compliant
> You can also use managed code with C++
>
>
> Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long time.
> For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new deobfuscator.
>
>
> Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll file.
> Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source Code.
> A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export them.
>
>
> I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
> nothing else but studying or playing.
>[/color]

[CJ Taylor]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

You know... RSA encryption can be cracked too... but most times, it's just
not worth the hassle...


"One Handed Man ( OHM - Terry Burns )" <news.microsoft .com> wrote in message
news:e%23jpIPZm EHA.712@TK2MSFT NGP09.phx.gbl.. .[color=blue]
> You really dont know what you are talking about do you !
>
>
>
> --
>
> OHM ( Terry Burns )
> . . . One-Handed-Man . . .
> If U Need My Email ,Ask Me
>
> Time flies when you don't know what you're doing
>
> "Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
> news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...[color=green]
> > http://www.junglecreatures.com/
> >
> > Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Notes:
> >
> > VB, C# are CLS compliant
> > You can also use managed code with C++
> >
> >
> > Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long time.
> > For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new deobfuscator.
> >
> >
> > Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll file.
> > Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source Code.
> > A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export[/color][/color]
them.[color=blue][color=green]
> >
> >
> > I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
> > nothing else but studying or playing.
> >[/color]
>
>[/color]

[Jeff Johnson [MVP: VB]]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code


"Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...
[color=blue]
> I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
> nothing else but studying or playing.[/color]

Troll, troll, troll your boat....

[One Handed Man \( OHM - Terry Burns \)]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

Virtually anything can be cracked, security management is all about managing
to an 'acceptable' risk for the environment in which the protected entity
exists.

--

OHM ( Terry Burns )
. . . One-Handed-Man . . .
If U Need My Email ,Ask Me

Time flies when you don't know what you're doing

"CJ Taylor" <[cege] at [tavayn] dit commmmm> wrote in message
news:ufpttQZmEH A.4004@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> You know... RSA encryption can be cracked too... but most times, it's just
> not worth the hassle...
>
>
> "One Handed Man ( OHM - Terry Burns )" <news.microsoft .com> wrote in[/color]
message[color=blue]
> news:e%23jpIPZm EHA.712@TK2MSFT NGP09.phx.gbl.. .[color=green]
> > You really dont know what you are talking about do you !
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > OHM ( Terry Burns )
> > . . . One-Handed-Man . . .
> > If U Need My Email ,Ask Me
> >
> > Time flies when you don't know what you're doing
> >
> > "Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
> > news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...[color=darkred]
> > > http://www.junglecreatures.com/
> > >
> > > Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Notes:
> > >
> > > VB, C# are CLS compliant
> > > You can also use managed code with C++
> > >
> > >
> > > Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long time.
> > > For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new[/color][/color][/color]
deobfuscator.[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > >
> > >
> > > Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll file.
> > > Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source Code.
> > > A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export[/color][/color]
> them.[color=green][color=darkred]
> > >
> > >
> > > I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
> > > nothing else but studying or playing.
> > >[/color]
> >
> >[/color]
>
>[/color]

[James]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code


"Jeff Johnson [MVP: VB]" <i.get@enough.s pam> wrote in message
news:u7H14WZmEH A.3156@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
>
> "Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
> news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...
>[color=green]
> > I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
> > nothing else but studying or playing.[/color]
>
> Troll, troll, troll your boat....
>
>[/color]

gently down the data stream...

[CJ Taylor]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

My point exactly.

=0

"One Handed Man ( OHM - Terry Burns )" <news.microsoft .com> wrote in message
news:u0hkk0ZmEH A.3060@TK2MSFTN GP14.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Virtually anything can be cracked, security management is all about[/color]
managing[color=blue]
> to an 'acceptable' risk for the environment in which the protected entity
> exists.
>
> --
>
> OHM ( Terry Burns )
> . . . One-Handed-Man . . .
> If U Need My Email ,Ask Me
>
> Time flies when you don't know what you're doing
>
> "CJ Taylor" <[cege] at [tavayn] dit commmmm> wrote in message
> news:ufpttQZmEH A.4004@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=green]
> > You know... RSA encryption can be cracked too... but most times, it's[/color][/color]
just[color=blue][color=green]
> > not worth the hassle...
> >
> >
> > "One Handed Man ( OHM - Terry Burns )" <news.microsoft .com> wrote in[/color]
> message[color=green]
> > news:e%23jpIPZm EHA.712@TK2MSFT NGP09.phx.gbl.. .[color=darkred]
> > > You really dont know what you are talking about do you !
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > OHM ( Terry Burns )
> > > . . . One-Handed-Man . . .
> > > If U Need My Email ,Ask Me
> > >
> > > Time flies when you don't know what you're doing
> > >
> > > "Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
> > > news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...
> > > > http://www.junglecreatures.com/
> > > >
> > > > Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Notes:
> > > >
> > > > VB, C# are CLS compliant
> > > > You can also use managed code with C++
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long[/color][/color][/color]
time.[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > > For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new[/color][/color]
> deobfuscator.[color=green][color=darkred]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll[/color][/color][/color]
file.[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > > Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source[/color][/color][/color]
Code.[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > > A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export[/color]
> > them.[color=darkred]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good[/color][/color][/color]
for[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > > nothing else but studying or playing.
> > > >
> > >
> > >[/color]
> >
> >[/color]
>
>[/color]

[Nak]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

Whoah!

"RSA encryption can be cracked too"

How much time do you have on your hands??

Nick.

[CJ Taylor]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

There was more to that sentence... that being, is it *really* worth the
effort?

"Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:OdPwgUamEH A.4004@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Whoah!
>
> "RSA encryption can be cracked too"
>
> How much time do you have on your hands??
>
> Nick.
>
>[/color]

[Steve McLellan]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

Probably - if you had an algorithm to do it fast, I'm sure you could get a
job in some fairly specialist places :-)

Steve

"CJ Taylor" <[cege] at [tavayn] dit commmmm> wrote in message
news:eJN13bamEH A.1712@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> There was more to that sentence... that being, is it *really* worth the
> effort?
>
> "Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
> news:OdPwgUamEH A.4004@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=green]
> > Whoah!
> >
> > "RSA encryption can be cracked too"
> >
> > How much time do you have on your hands??
> >
> > Nick.
> >
> >[/color]
>
>[/color]

[CJ Taylor]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

Mmm yes...

would you mind posting that algorithm here? =)

"Steve McLellan" <sjm.NOSPAM AT fixerlabs DOT com> wrote in message
news:%23dd5Hham EHA.952@TK2MSFT NGP14.phx.gbl.. .[color=blue]
> Probably - if you had an algorithm to do it fast, I'm sure you could get a
> job in some fairly specialist places :-)
>
> Steve
>
> "CJ Taylor" <[cege] at [tavayn] dit commmmm> wrote in message
> news:eJN13bamEH A.1712@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...[color=green]
> > There was more to that sentence... that being, is it *really* worth the
> > effort?
> >
> > "Nak" <a@a.com> wrote in message
> > news:OdPwgUamEH A.4004@TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl...[color=darkred]
> > > Whoah!
> > >
> > > "RSA encryption can be cracked too"
> > >
> > > How much time do you have on your hands??
> > >
> > > Nick.
> > >
> > >[/color]
> >
> >[/color]
>
>[/color]

[ErikS]

Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

You need to get out more often:

http://denisbauer.com/NETTools/FileDisassembler.aspx

"Vortex Soft" <NoSpam@NoSpam. Net> wrote in message
news:%23hF4z%23 XmEHA.2968@TK2M SFTNGP14.phx.gb l...[color=blue]
> http://www.junglecreatures.com/
>
> Try it and tell me what's happenning in the Microsoft Corporation.
>
>
>
>
> Notes:
>
> VB, C# are CLS compliant
> You can also use managed code with C++
>
>
> Using what they call obfuscator, will not help you for a long time.
> For each new obfuscator there will allways exist a new deobfuscator.
>
>
> Your source's Symbols are written unchanged in the exe or dll file.
> Looking to your Symbols, it's easy to understand your Source Code.
> A honest compiler does not expose any Symbols, unless you Export them.
>
>
> I like VB, it is an easy yet powerfull language, but it's good for
> nothing else but studying or playing.
>[/color]