DOM access speed mini BenchMark : Safari vs FireFox vs Opera

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Jorge
    #1

    DOM access speed mini BenchMark : Safari vs FireFox vs Opera

    Based on the table shuffling code of the recent cljs thread "Randomize
    HTML Table Rows from JavaScript " (http://tinyurl.com/56g37t), I get
    this results :

    e.replaceChild( ) (SAM's code) :

    FF2 : 1x
    FF3: 1.3x
    Opera 9.5 : 4.8x
    Safari r34469 : 8.4x


    e.insertBefore( ) (Thomas' code) :

    FF2 : 1x
    FF3: 1.2x
    Opera 9.5 : 4.7x
    Safari r34469 : 10.8x

    e.appendChild() (Jorge's code) :

    FF2 : 1x
    FF3: 1.1x
    Opera 9.5 : 4.3x
    Safari r34469 : 10.2x

    As the JavaScript core (Sun Spider : webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/
    sunspider.html) benchmarks were already showing, Safari is the
    fastest, but I wasn't expecting such **huge** differences in DOM
    manipulation speeds...

    The data : (got it on my Mac/OS 10.5.3)

    FF2.0.0.14

    159.1/100 ms (SAM)
    104.2/100 ms (Thomas)
    88.66/100 ms (Jorge)

    FF3.0

    123.23/100 ms (SAM)
    86.7/100 ms (Thomas)
    83.72/100 ms (Jorge)

    Opera 9.5

    33.25/100 ms (SAM)
    22.33/100 ms (Thomas)
    20.61/100 ms (Jorge)

    Safari/WebKit r34469 :

    18.92/100 ms (SAM)
    9.69/100 ms (Thomas)
    8.72/100 ms (Jorge)

    Take it with a grain of salt.

    --Jorge.
    Tags: None
    • Gregor Kofler
      #2
      Re: DOM access speed mini BenchMark : Safari vs FireFox vs Opera

      Jorge meinte:
      Based on the table shuffling code of the recent cljs thread "Randomize
      HTML Table Rows from JavaScript " (http://tinyurl.com/56g37t), I get
      this results :
      As the JavaScript core (Sun Spider : webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/
      sunspider.html) benchmarks were already showing, Safari is the
      fastest, but I wasn't expecting such **huge** differences in DOM
      manipulation speeds...
      >
      The data : (got it on my Mac/OS 10.5.3)
      >
      FF2.0.0.14
      >
      159.1/100 ms (SAM)
      104.2/100 ms (Thomas)
      88.66/100 ms (Jorge)
      >
      FF3.0
      >
      123.23/100 ms (SAM)
      86.7/100 ms (Thomas)
      83.72/100 ms (Jorge)
      >
      Opera 9.5
      >
      33.25/100 ms (SAM)
      22.33/100 ms (Thomas)
      20.61/100 ms (Jorge)
      >
      Safari/WebKit r34469 :
      >
      18.92/100 ms (SAM)
      9.69/100 ms (Thomas)
      8.72/100 ms (Jorge)
      >
      Take it with a grain of salt.
      Indeed. (WinXP, "normally" running system)

      FF3 (all sorts of extensions activated): 94/64/63
      Safari 3: 21/15/15
      Opera 9.5: 15/0.5/0 (!)

      Looking at the result I can state, that Opera is approx. 1,000,000,000
      faster than Safari... Man this *is* fast.

      Gregor




      --
      http://photo.gregorkofler.at ::: Landschafts- und Reisefotografie
      http://web.gregorkofler.com ::: meine JS-Spielwiese
      http://www.image2d.com ::: Bildagentur für den alpinen Raum

        Comment

        • Jorge
          #3
          Re: DOM access speed mini BenchMark : Safari vs FireFox vs Opera

          On Jul 2, 9:57 am, Gregor Kofler <use...@gregork ofler.atwrote:
          Opera 9.5: 15/0.5/0 (!)
          >
          Looking at the result I can state, that Opera is approx. 1,000,000,000
          faster than Safari... Man this *is* fast.
          Yeah ! That last 0 means that that Opera of yours can do infinite work
          in no time at all. Keep it in a safe place, that's worth millions.
          Unfortunately mine read 90/37/32 and so it's not worth so much.

          --Jorge.

            Comment

            • Gregor Kofler
              #4
              Re: DOM access speed mini BenchMark : Safari vs FireFox vs Opera

              Jorge meinte:
              On Jul 2, 9:57 am, Gregor Kofler <use...@gregork ofler.atwrote:
              >Opera 9.5: 15/0.5/0 (!)
              >>
              >Looking at the result I can state, that Opera is approx. 1,000,000,000
              >faster than Safari... Man this *is* fast.
              >
              Yeah ! That last 0 means that that Opera of yours can do infinite work
              in no time at all. Keep it in a safe place, that's worth millions.
              It covers CD-ROMs with a not-so-thin golden layer, too. It's so amazing.
              The 0.5 mark isn't that bad either. I'll use it for brute-force cracking
              of 256-bit keys.
              Unfortunately mine read 90/37/32 and so it's not worth so much.
              Perhaps some nightly build, where they left out the good parts.

              Gregor


              --
              http://photo.gregorkofler.at ::: Landschafts- und Reisefotografie
              http://web.gregorkofler.com ::: meine JS-Spielwiese
              http://www.image2d.com ::: Bildagentur für den alpinen Raum

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...