Re: Intro. JavaScript
Lol
Mozilla (my web browser) rapes that site
"Christophe r Jeris" <cjeris@oinvzer .net> wrote in message
news:usmildkju. fsf@oinvzer.net ...[color=blue]
> "Charlene Russ" <lorena29@bells outh.net> writes:
> [in reply to Michael Winter][color=green]
> > I think there's most definitely another issue here regarding your
> > objection entirely which has nothing to do with JavaScript.[/color]
>
> It's reasonable to suppose that the quality of a web services
> education shop's instruction is reflected in the quality of the
> shop's own website. From
>
> (1) your organization's obvious failure to correctly understand and
> implement the relevant standards in your site,
>
> (2) the fact that you are so rude as to post your commercial
> messages repeatedly in a short span of time, and
>
> (3) the poor English and apparent willingness to perpetuate common
> fallacies (such as the two-browser world) shown in your post,
>
> surely it's not surprising that many readers of this group conclude
> that your messages are annoying and your organization incompetent?
> Personal malice is a totally unnecessary hypothesis.
>
> Chris Jeris cjeris@oinvzer. net[/color]
Lol
Mozilla (my web browser) rapes that site
"Christophe r Jeris" <cjeris@oinvzer .net> wrote in message
news:usmildkju. fsf@oinvzer.net ...[color=blue]
> "Charlene Russ" <lorena29@bells outh.net> writes:
> [in reply to Michael Winter][color=green]
> > I think there's most definitely another issue here regarding your
> > objection entirely which has nothing to do with JavaScript.[/color]
>
> It's reasonable to suppose that the quality of a web services
> education shop's instruction is reflected in the quality of the
> shop's own website. From
>
> (1) your organization's obvious failure to correctly understand and
> implement the relevant standards in your site,
>
> (2) the fact that you are so rude as to post your commercial
> messages repeatedly in a short span of time, and
>
> (3) the poor English and apparent willingness to perpetuate common
> fallacies (such as the two-browser world) shown in your post,
>
> surely it's not surprising that many readers of this group conclude
> that your messages are annoying and your organization incompetent?
> Personal malice is a totally unnecessary hypothesis.
>
> Chris Jeris cjeris@oinvzer. net[/color]
Comment