Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AppPad

    Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

    Hello,
    This is a new website I am involved with, and we are seeking to open
    up to a shortlist of users.



    The basic overview of the service is:
    - You define Object Type models & can use a Javascript API to persist
    object data.
    - You create HTML+Javascript applications (everything is provided for
    you - no hosting or DB needed)

    Hoping to find a few curious/interested Javascript gurus out there
    who'd like to try it out.
    Thanks & regards.
  • Peter Michaux

    #2
    Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

    On Feb 18, 11:38 pm, AppPad <sav74...@gmail .comwrote:
    Hello,
    This is a new website I am involved with, and we are seeking to open
    up to a shortlist of users.
    >

    >
    The basic overview of the service is:
    - You define Object Type models & can use a Javascript API to persist
    object data.
    - You create HTML+Javascript applications (everything is provided for
    you - no hosting or DB needed)
    That is a neat idea. I'm sure there are people that know front-end
    technology but not the database side of things. Adobe Air is trying to
    leverage this knowledge to build desktop apps.
    Hoping to find a few curious/interested Javascript gurus out there
    who'd like to try it out.
    Unfortunately I don't have the time but good luck!

    Peter

    Comment

    • David Mark

      #3
      Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

      On Feb 19, 2:38 am, AppPad <sav74...@gmail .comwrote:
      Hello,
      This is a new website I am involved with, and we are seeking to open
      up to a shortlist of users.
      >

      >
      [snip]

      An application framework based on HTML and JavaScript will require, at
      the very least, developers who can write valid HTML and solid cross-
      browser JavaScript. Best of luck in finding some.

      Comment

      • rf

        #4
        Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta


        "David Mark" <dmark.cinsoft@ gmail.comwrote in message
        news:79fd2ead-10ee-41e3-8ae8-3008eb881a8c@72 g2000hsu.google groups.com...
        On Feb 19, 2:38 am, AppPad <sav74...@gmail .comwrote:
        Hello,
        This is a new website I am involved with, and we are seeking to open
        up to a shortlist of users.
        >
        Get your very own domain easily. Fast and professional customer service.

        >
        [snip]

        An application framework based on HTML and JavaScript will require, at
        the very least, developers who can write valid HTML and solid cross-
        browser JavaScript. Best of luck in finding some.

        They are certainly not living at the above URL :-)

        Not even a bloody doctype!

        background-color: 666666; is probably why I get my shocking pink background
        :-)


        Comment

        • Randy Webb

          #5
          Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

          David Mark said the following on 2/21/2008 3:00 AM:
          On Feb 21, 12:19 am, AppPad <sav74...@gmail .comwrote:
          <snip>
          >will take a bit more research on the best way to do it.
          >
          Not really.
          >
          window.onload = myfunction;
          Don't let Thomas know that :)

          --
          Randy
          Chance Favors The Prepared Mind
          comp.lang.javas cript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq/index.html
          Javascript Best Practices - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/

          Comment

          • Randy Webb

            #6
            Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

            Randy Webb said the following on 2/21/2008 6:14 AM:

            <snip>
            <script type="text/javascript" src="prototype-1.6.0.2"></script>
            <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.2.3"></script>
            With the .js extension of course. It is what happens when I think ahead
            of myself. They had installed jQuery and Prototype on the server and had
            put it in every single page on my server and "fixing" code so that it
            was "unobtrusiv e". No, I was not happy. They spent Thursday, Friday and
            part of this last Monday fixing it.

            --
            Randy
            Chance Favors The Prepared Mind
            comp.lang.javas cript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq/index.html
            Javascript Best Practices - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/

            Comment

            • David Mark

              #7
              Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

              On Feb 21, 6:19 am, Randy Webb <HikksNotAtH... @aol.comwrote:
              Randy Webb said the following on 2/21/2008 6:14 AM:
              >
              <snip>
              >
              <script type="text/javascript" src="prototype-1.6.0.2"></script>
              <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.2.3"></script>
              >
              With the .js extension of course. It is what happens when I think ahead
              of myself. They had installed jQuery and Prototype on the server and had
              put it in every single page on my server and "fixing" code so that it
              was "unobtrusiv e". No, I was not happy. They spent Thursday, Friday and
              part of this last Monday fixing it.
              >
              And Tuesday looking for new jobs?

              Comment

              • Gregor Kofler

                #8
                Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

                David Mark meinte:
                Certainly unobtrusive JavaScript via Prototype *and* jQuery is
                madness. Your "senior programmer" should be demoted to junior
                janitor.
                Come off it! Janitors can save the universe.
                <http://en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/Space_Quest>

                Gregor


                --
                http://photo.gregorkofler.at ::: Landschafts- und Reisefotografie
                http://web.gregorkofler.com ::: meine JS-Spielwiese
                http://www.image2d.com ::: Bildagentur für den alpinen Raum

                Comment

                • Randy Webb

                  #9
                  Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

                  David Mark said the following on 2/21/2008 6:46 AM:
                  On Feb 21, 6:19 am, Randy Webb <HikksNotAtH... @aol.comwrote:
                  >Randy Webb said the following on 2/21/2008 6:14 AM:
                  >>
                  ><snip>
                  >>
                  >><script type="text/javascript" src="prototype-1.6.0.2"></script>
                  >><script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.2.3"></script>
                  >With the .js extension of course. It is what happens when I think ahead
                  >of myself. They had installed jQuery and Prototype on the server and had
                  >put it in every single page on my server and "fixing" code so that it
                  >was "unobtrusiv e". No, I was not happy. They spent Thursday, Friday and
                  >part of this last Monday fixing it.
                  >>
                  >
                  And Tuesday looking for new jobs?
                  Just him. It was his team that did the leg work and it saved them. The
                  only thing that saved me was my daily backups. Most of Monday was spent
                  double checking and making sure that everything from Wednesday, Thursday
                  and Friday got updated in the databases. They went to a paper back up
                  system and we had to make sure everything got entered and saved. It did
                  make me go to a complete daily backup. We were doing weekly backups on
                  the entire system and daily backups on critical data. Now, it is done
                  daily on the entire system.

                  They all know, without a doubt, how pissed off I can get though.

                  --
                  Randy
                  Chance Favors The Prepared Mind
                  comp.lang.javas cript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq/index.html
                  Javascript Best Practices - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/

                  Comment

                  • Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

                    #10
                    Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

                    David Mark wrote:
                    On Feb 21, 6:14 am, Randy Webb <HikksNotAtH... @aol.comwrote:
                    >David Mark said the following on 2/21/2008 4:31 AM:
                    >>On Feb 21, 4:19 am, Randy Webb <HikksNotAtH... @aol.comwrote:
                    >>>David Mark said the following on 2/21/2008 3:00 AM:
                    >>>>On Feb 21, 12:19 am, AppPad <sav74...@gmail .comwrote:
                    >>><snip>
                    >>>>>will take a bit more research on the best way to do it.
                    >>>>Not really.
                    >>>>window.onlo ad = myfunction;
                    >>>Don't let Thomas know that :)
                    >>Proprietary and error-prone approach. I know.
                    >Only in Thomas' warped mind is it.
                    >
                    Agreed.
                    Once you recognized that there is inherent truth in the statement that your
                    favorite (collection of) browser(s) is not the standard for every user agent
                    out there, you will see how mistaken you really are here.
                    ><script type="text/javascript" src="prototype-1.6.0.2"></script>
                    ><script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.2.3"></script>
                    >
                    As Thomas would say: OMG.
                    Don't quote me unless you mean it.


                    PointedEars
                    --
                    realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
                    evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
                    madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
                    -- Bjoern Hoehrmann

                    Comment

                    • Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

                      #11
                      Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

                      Gregor Kofler wrote:
                      David Mark meinte:
                      >Certainly unobtrusive JavaScript via Prototype *and* jQuery is
                      >madness. Your "senior programmer" should be demoted to junior
                      >janitor.
                      >
                      Come off it! Janitors can save the universe.
                      <http://en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/Space_Quest>
                      YMMD :)

                      \\// PointedEars, adding a "find my SQ6 game box" reminder
                      --
                      var bugRiddenCrashP ronePieceOfJunk = (
                      navigator.userA gent.indexOf('M SIE 5') != -1
                      && navigator.userA gent.indexOf('M ac') != -1
                      ) // Plone, register_functi on.js:16

                      Comment

                      • Peter Michaux

                        #12
                        Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

                        On Feb 22, 5:07 pm, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...@we b.de>
                        wrote:
                        David Mark wrote:
                        On Feb 21, 6:14 am, Randy Webb <HikksNotAtH... @aol.comwrote:
                        David Mark said the following on 2/21/2008 4:31 AM:
                        >On Feb 21, 4:19 am, Randy Webb <HikksNotAtH... @aol.comwrote:
                        >>David Mark said the following on 2/21/2008 3:00 AM:
                        >>>On Feb 21, 12:19 am, AppPad <sav74...@gmail .comwrote:
                        >><snip>
                        >>>>will take a bit more research on the best way to do it.
                        >>>Not really.
                        >>>window.onloa d = myfunction;
                        >>Don't let Thomas know that :)
                        >Proprietary and error-prone approach. I know.
                        Only in Thomas' warped mind is it.
                        >
                        Agreed.
                        >
                        Once you recognized that there is inherent truth in the statement that your
                        favorite (collection of) browser(s) is not the standard for every user agent
                        out there, you will see how mistaken you really are here.
                        Please explain.

                        Peter

                        Comment

                        • toby.oconnell@gmail.com

                          #13
                          Re: Build web apps in Javascript - new service open for beta

                          On Feb 21, 4:32 am, Randy Webb <HikksNotAtH... @aol.comwrote:

                          <snip>
                          >
                          Just him. It was his team that did the leg work and it saved them. The
                          only thing that saved me was my daily backups. Most of Monday was spent
                          double checking and making sure that everything from Wednesday, Thursday
                          and Friday got updated in the databases. They went to a paper back up
                          system and we had to make sure everything got entered and saved. It did
                          make me go to a complete daily backup. We were doing weekly backups on
                          the entire system and daily backups on critical data. Now, it is done
                          daily on the entire system.
                          >
                          They all know, without a doubt, how pissed off I can get though.

                          I'm a little late to this thread, but was wondering: Are you not using
                          a source code repository? If so, I don't understand why you would
                          need backups to save you (aside from cases where the repository gets
                          wiped). That would make the code much easier to roll back. It can
                          still be pretty mucked up if some "good" changes were mixed in with
                          the bad changes, though. Just curious because I would feel safer
                          reverting to a particular fine-grained, revision-based state than a
                          certain time-based state (of the backup).

                          Comment

                          Working...