JavaScript at Davar Web Site

[Vladimir Veytsel]

Please find at the link below samples of JavaScript programming
techniques along with several useful fully-functional JavaScripts.

http://www.davar.net/INTERNET/JAVA-SCR/JAVA-SCR.HTM

JavaScript Frequently Asked Questions
JavaScript programming code patters
Extract navigation bar generation (function)
Local control of modification date colors (driven by date difference)
Random song (random selection from a list sectioned into 3 parts)
Random problem (random selection from a list sectioned into "n" parts)
Random tagline (random selection controlled by selection history)
Alphabet hyperlinks generation (function)
Go board position generation (function)
Productivity issues of the document.write
JavaScript links

--
Best regards,
Vladimir Veytsel.

http://www.davar.net

[Ivo]

Re: JavaScript at Davar Web Site


"Vladimir Veytsel" <Davar@optonlin e.net> wrote in message
news:3F7B75F9.8 F36726D@optonli ne.net...[color=blue]
> Please find at the link below samples of JavaScript programming
> techniques along with several useful fully-functional JavaScripts.
>
> http://www.davar.net/INTERNET/JAVA-SCR/JAVA-SCR.HTM[/color]

<quote>
Netscape(4.7) was used to develop and test all required JavaScript
functionality. If pages that follow will cause you browser to display
script error messages or to malfunction, please back out and use Netscape to
browse these pages. Netscape is free to download, easy to install, and it
will coexist with your primary browser without causing conflicts.
</quote>
Interesting concept, but certainly worth a warning in advance these days. No
offense, I 've also heard of people still using Commodore 64.
However, I 'm afraid I have to disagree with the last statement. When I
installed it long ago, it took over my complete registry. I uninstalled it
within weeks. Today, more than 12 months later, it is still listed as my
default HTML editor!??
Ivo

[Lee]

Re: JavaScript at Davar Web Site

Ivo said:
[color=blue]
>I 'm afraid I have to disagree with the last statement. When I
>installed it long ago, it took over my complete registry. I uninstalled it
>within weeks. Today, more than 12 months later, it is still listed as my
>default HTML editor!??[/color]

What version was that?
I use Netscape 7, IE and Opera on three or four machines
without trouble. Edit > Preferences > Advanced > System
and check the boxes of file types that Netscape should
handle.

[Ivo]

Re: JavaScript at Davar Web Site

"Lee" <REM0VElbspamtr ap@cox.net> wrote in message
news:blgb810qvb @drn.newsguy.co m...[color=blue]
> Ivo said:
>[color=green]
> >I 'm afraid I have to disagree with the last statement. When I
> >installed it long ago, it took over my complete registry. I uninstalled[/color][/color]
it[color=blue][color=green]
> >within weeks. Today, more than 12 months later, it is still listed as my
> >default HTML editor!??[/color]
>
> What version was that?
> I use Netscape 7, IE and Opera on three or four machines
> without trouble. Edit > Preferences > Advanced > System
> and check the boxes of file types that Netscape should
> handle.
>[/color]
That was 4.7. I just went through my Windows ME registry again, found three
occurances of the word Netscape (and not in innocent history lists), deleted
them all, rebooted, still there. Even stranger is, if I then overcome my
aversion and click on "Edit with Netscape Navigator", it opens Netscape
Composer, but there is no such application to be found in the Program Files
folder or anywhere else...
Ivo

[Vladimir Veytsel]

Re: JavaScript at Davar Web Site

Sorry about that, I'll add to my warning something like "to the best
of my
personal experience", which hopefully would help to avoid confusion.
I use
Netscape 4.7 with Win-2000, and never have any problems with it.
That's why
I've never tried to clean it out of the system, and might be unaware
of any
complexities associated with this.

I also run simultaneously with Netscape 4.7 (I mean they all are open
most
of the time on the same box) Netscape 7, Mozilla, Opera, and, of
course, IE.
I use them to test my JavaScrip-intensive pages. I used to have most
of the problems with IE (what else?). Still can't get IE intepret a
relatively
simple script http://www.davar.net/INTERNET/JAVA-SCR/POSITION.HTM
for building Go board position. All other browsers chew it without a
glitch.

As for 4.7, I've simply got accustomed to it, like it's simple and
compact appearence (when cleared of stupid icons) that leaves most of
the screen for content. As I use other browsers for testing, I didn't
saw any significant reason to move from 4.7 to one of them so far. I
won't hesitate to switch
when I'll see such reason.

Vlad.

--
"Ivo" <no@thank.you > wrote in message news:<3f7c27f6$ 0$35694$1b62eed f@news.wanadoo. nl>...[color=blue]
> "Lee" <REM0VElbspamtr ap@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:blgb810qvb @drn.newsguy.co m...[color=green]
> > Ivo said:
> >[color=darkred]
> > >I 'm afraid I have to disagree with the last statement. When I
> > >installed it long ago, it took over my complete registry. I uninstalled[/color][/color]
> it[color=green][color=darkred]
> > >within weeks. Today, more than 12 months later, it is still listed as my
> > >default HTML editor!??[/color]
> >
> > What version was that?
> > I use Netscape 7, IE and Opera on three or four machines
> > without trouble. Edit > Preferences > Advanced > System
> > and check the boxes of file types that Netscape should
> > handle.
> >[/color]
> That was 4.7. I just went through my Windows ME registry again, found three
> occurances of the word Netscape (and not in innocent history lists), deleted
> them all, rebooted, still there. Even stranger is, if I then overcome my
> aversion and click on "Edit with Netscape Navigator", it opens Netscape
> Composer, but there is no such application to be found in the Program Files
> folder or anywhere else...
> Ivo[/color]

[Ivo]

Re: JavaScript at Davar Web Site

"Vladimir Veytsel" <Davar@optonlin e.net> wrote in message
news:6672d61f.0 310031454.1b44b 8b7@posting.goo gle.com...[color=blue]
> <sn> As I use other browsers for testing, I didn't
> saw any significant reason to move from 4.7 to one of them so
> far. I won't hesitate to switch
> when I'll see such reason.
>
> Vlad.[/color]

If it ain't broke,don't fix it. Good.
I 'm looking at your POSITION.HTM now, it 's pretty long. I get:
errormsg: Not implemented.
errorline: 71
errorchar: 27
Which one is that?
Ivo