IFRAME & AJAX

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lasse Reichstein Nielsen

    #16
    Re: IFRAME & AJAX

    Ivan Marsh <annoyed@you.no w> writes:
    [color=blue]
    > I'd have to assume the warship got its name from the Greek warrior of the
    > same name... I have no idea where he got his name.[/color]

    His mother?
    /L
    --
    Lasse Reichstein Nielsen - lrn@hotpop.com
    DHTML Death Colors: <URL:http://www.infimum.dk/HTML/rasterTriangleD OM.html>
    'Faith without judgement merely degrades the spirit divine.'

    Comment

    • John W. Kennedy

      #17
      Re: IFRAME &amp; AJAX

      Tony wrote:[color=blue]
      > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:[color=green][color=darkred]
      >>>>>>> AJAX != refresh
      >>>>>>
      >>>>>> Nonsense.
      >>>>>
      >>>>> Wasn't Ajax advertising a new, refreshing scent?
      >>>>>
      >>>>> Or was that Comet?
      >>>>
      >>>> I beg your pardon?
      >>>
      >>> You need a sense of humor Thomas.[/color]
      >>
      >>
      >> Believe it or not: I /have/ a great deal of humor (and that does not mean
      >> transpiration). However, that does no help you if you do not understand
      >> the joke. Hence my question.[/color]
      >
      > Ajax = a brand of scouring cleanser sold in the US.[/color]

      Ajax is also sold in the UK. It would appear that Comet is not.
      [color=blue]
      > Comet = another brand scouring cleanser sold in the US.[/color]


      --
      John W. Kennedy
      "But now is a new thing which is very old--
      that the rich make themselves richer and not poorer,
      which is the true Gospel, for the poor's sake."
      -- Charles Williams. "Judgement at Chelmsford"

      Comment

      • Danny Stolle

        #18
        Re: IFRAME &amp; AJAX ; point me out

        Hi,

        Well 'to AJAX or not to AJAX' that is the question I was asking my self.
        Do I realy need AJAX and when I saw a script developed with javascript
        and that the script created an ActiveX object, my heart stopped! After
        being defribillated :-) I thought of remote scripting using an IFRAME,
        after all I read a lot about how to do this and I tried to give it a shot.

        Well success granted and I got my first (not final yet) remote
        scripting; the alternative AJAX without using AJAX. Entering a postcode,
        onblur the textfield, the server script grabs the data from the database
        and pushes it back to the client-script. Wow the client page didn't even
        blinc.

        Quite nice, need ... cewl... But euhm, now I am biting my lip.

        Remote scripting using IFRAME works, is quite nice, but surely there are
        lots of disadvantages using the technique. Can somebody point me out the
        disadvantages working with the IFRAME methodology? What are the drawbacks?

        Thanx in advance.

        Danny

        Randy Webb wrote:[color=blue]
        > Tony said the following on 3/10/2006 1:26 PM:
        >[color=green]
        >> Randy Webb wrote:
        >>[color=darkred]
        >>>>>
        >>>>> Wasn't Ajax advertising a new, refreshing scent?
        >>>>>
        >>>>> Or was that Comet?
        >>>>
        >>>>
        >>>>
        >>>> I beg your pardon?
        >>>
        >>>
        >>>
        >>> You need a sense of humor Thomas.[/color]
        >>
        >>
        >> :)
        >>[color=darkred]
        >>>
        >>> But, Ajax was a British warship in World War II[/color]
        >>
        >>
        >> What amuses me is the obvious (at least to me) INTENT behind Jesse
        >> coming up with "AJAX", after the previously enjoyed popularity of "SOAP"
        >>
        >> So, what's next? CASCADE? (you figure it out...)
        >>[/color]
        >
        > What amuses me the most is how most of the people who come posting "I
        > want AJAX" don't have the first clue what it really is. It's a term some
        > board room pundit heard and they just had to have it. Then, at the
        > country club they can brag "Yeah, we use AJAX on our site".
        >
        > Too bad I use more reliable methods :)
        >[/color]

        Comment

        • cp

          #19
          Re: IFRAME &amp; AJAX ; point me out

          hi !

          can you post here your example with the activeX ?

          thank you

          cp


          Comment

          • Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

            #20
            Re: IFRAME &amp; AJAX ; point me out

            cp wrote:
            [color=blue]
            > can you post here your example with the activeX ?[/color]

            <URL:http://jibbering.com/2002/4/httprequest.htm l>


            HTH

            PointedEars

            Comment

            • Jim Ley

              #21
              Re: IFRAME &amp; AJAX ; point me out

              On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:08:32 +0100, Danny Stolle <noTh@nx.org> wrote:
              [color=blue]
              >Remote scripting using IFRAME works, is quite nice, but surely there are
              >lots of disadvantages using the technique. Can somebody point me out the
              >disadvantage s working with the IFRAME methodology? What are the drawbacks?[/color]

              In general the IFRAME method is superior, it's general flaws are in
              the area of accessibility, hidden frames aren't completely hidden and
              can confuse users, and the higher complexity. The advantages of
              faster downloads and incremental activity normally outweigh them for
              data intensive systems.

              Jim.

              Comment

              • Randy Webb

                #22
                Re: IFRAME &amp; AJAX ; point me out

                Danny Stolle said the following on 3/17/2006 2:08 PM:[color=blue]
                > Hi,
                >
                > Well 'to AJAX or not to AJAX' that is the question I was asking my self.[/color]

                If you have to ask yourself that, you typically don't need it.
                [color=blue]
                > Do I realy need AJAX and when I saw a script developed with javascript
                > and that the script created an ActiveX object, my heart stopped! After
                > being defribillated :-) I thought of remote scripting using an IFRAME,
                > after all I read a lot about how to do this and I tried to give it a shot.[/color]

                Remote scripting with IFrames has been around for almost a decade. It's
                very reliable.
                [color=blue]
                > Well success granted and I got my first (not final yet) remote
                > scripting; the alternative AJAX without using AJAX. Entering a postcode,
                > onblur the textfield, the server script grabs the data from the database
                > and pushes it back to the client-script. Wow the client page didn't even
                > blinc.[/color]

                onblur? Don't use onblur, use onchange.
                [color=blue]
                > Quite nice, need ... cewl... But euhm, now I am biting my lip.[/color]

                Stop, biting your lip hurts after a while.
                [color=blue]
                > Remote scripting using IFRAME works, is quite nice, but surely there are
                > lots of disadvantages using the technique. Can somebody point me out the
                > disadvantages working with the IFRAME methodology? What are the drawbacks?[/color]

                Lack of IFrame support.
                Lack of Scripting support.
                Maybe lack of cross-frame scripting support.

                Of all the options available, IFrame scripting is the most widely
                supported/reliable method there is though.
                [color=blue]
                > Thanx in advance.[/color]

                Thanks for not top-posting in the future.

                And thanks for using a decent spell checker in the future as well.

                --
                Randy
                comp.lang.javas cript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq & newsgroup weekly
                Javascript Best Practices - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/
                Answer:It destroys the order of the conversation
                Question: Why?
                Answer: Top-Posting.
                Question: Whats the most annoying thing on Usenet?

                Comment

                Working...