TIBET Framework

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sneill@mxlogic.com

    TIBET Framework

    Hello,

    Do any developers have firsthand experience of the TIBET Framework
    (www.technicalpursuit.com) they might care to share?

    Your thoughts / impressions are welcome.

    Thanks,
    Steve

  • Randy Webb

    #2
    Re: TIBET Framework

    sneill@mxlogic. com said the following on 8/23/2005 5:30 PM:[color=blue]
    > Hello,
    >
    > Do any developers have firsthand experience of the TIBET Framework
    > (www.technicalpursuit.com) they might care to share?
    >
    > Your thoughts / impressions are welcome.[/color]

    No firsthand experience from using it, but from reading the site, it has
    some inaccuracies.

    <quote>
    Things I'd want from an AJAX toolkit include: browser independence
    </quote>

    <quote>
    We started building toward that goal 6 years ago and we're proud to say
    we met every one of those requirements.
    </quote>

    That implies, to me, that it has browser independence when it doesn't.
    At the present time, it is impossible to create an application that is
    HTTPRequest dependent that is "browser independent". Unless there is a
    browser that has been released in the last 2 months or so, there is no
    browser on a MAC that supports this so-called "AJAX".

    AJAX is nothing more than a buzz-word that some programmer came up with
    to make his credentials seem a little more "profession al". Since then,
    every boardroom knee jerk pencil pusher wants a technology that has been
    used for a very long time in its dynamic loading of data without
    changing the top URI in the page.

    I even have a way of dynamically loading data that has more support for
    it, even in Netscape 4, than this "AJAX" does.

    --
    Randy
    comp.lang.javas cript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq & newsgroup weekly

    Comment

    • Donius

      #3
      Re: TIBET Framework

      "Unless there is a
      browser that has been released in the last 2 months or so, there is no
      browser on a MAC that supports this so-called "AJAX"."

      Not to be combatitive, but Safari and Firefox both support the
      HTTPRequest basics on the mac. :) I've been building for just that!

      -Brendan

      Comment

      • sneill@mxlogic.com

        #4
        Re: TIBET Framework

        Perhaps you don't comprehend the full capabilities of TIBET? It's the
        most extensive and capable framework I've seen to date, and is
        certainly more than just XMLHTTP. It precedes "AJAX" and in my mind has
        a richer pedigree than other more recent toolsets/frameworks.

        I would encourage you to look into it.

        Steve

        Comment

        • Randy Webb

          #5
          Re: TIBET Framework

          Donius said the following on 8/23/2005 10:27 PM:
          [color=blue]
          > "Unless there is a
          > browser that has been released in the last 2 months or so, there is no
          > browser on a MAC that supports this so-called "AJAX"."
          >
          > Not to be combatitive, but Safari and Firefox both support the
          > HTTPRequest basics on the mac. :) I've been building for just that![/color]

          Not combative, informative :) Actually it is good to see the MAC
          browsers beginning to support it.

          --
          Randy
          comp.lang.javas cript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq & newsgroup weekly

          Comment

          • Randy Webb

            #6
            Re: TIBET Framework

            sneill@mxlogic. com said the following on 8/24/2005 11:20 AM:
            [color=blue]
            > Perhaps you don't comprehend the full capabilities of TIBET?[/color]

            Perhaps you don't comprehend the full aspect of this groups FAQ with
            regards to quoting what you are replying to?

            Section 2.3:

            When replying to a message on the group trim quotes of the preceding
            messages to the minimum needed and add your comments below the pertinent
            section of quoted material, as per FYI28/RFC1855 (never top post).
            [color=blue]
            > It's the most extensive and capable framework I've seen to date, and is
            > certainly more than just XMLHTTP.[/color]

            That may be, but so is Dreamweaver and DW is crap.
            [color=blue]
            > It precedes "AJAX" and in my mind has a richer pedigree than other
            > more recent toolsets/frameworks.[/color]

            It may precede the term "AJAX" but I doubt, very seriously, that it
            precedes the process that AJAX proclaims to be. Namely that of
            dynamically loading data from a server without changing/reloading the
            page. That has been being done for at least 8 years, nothing "new" about
            it other than a name.
            [color=blue]
            > I would encourage you to look into it.[/color]

            I read enough of it to see that it claims to do something it can't do.

            --
            Randy
            comp.lang.javas cript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq & newsgroup weekly

            Comment

            Working...