Just testing ... Sorry!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ByrgB

    Just testing ... Sorry!

    I needed to test that my setup is OK.
    Sorry!
  • John Bokma

    #2
    Re: Just testing ... Sorry!

    wildblue_111@ho tmail.com (ByrgB) wrote in news:a6e8b14d.0 409231727.d47c8 b4
    @posting.google .com:
    [color=blue]
    > I needed to test that my setup is OK.
    > Sorry![/color]

    There are test groups for this kind of garbage.

    --
    John MexIT: http://johnbokma.com/mexit/
    personal page: http://johnbokma.com/
    Experienced programmer available: http://castleamber.com/
    Happy Customers: http://castleamber.com/testimonials.html

    Comment

    • Byrg B.

      #3
      Re: Just testing ... Sorry!

      On 24 Sep 2004 08:38:59 GMT, John Bokma <postmaster@cas tleamber.com>
      wrote:
      [color=blue]
      >wildblue_111@h otmail.com (ByrgB) wrote in news:a6e8b14d.0 409231727.d47c8 b4
      >@posting.googl e.com:
      >[color=green]
      >> I needed to test that my setup is OK.
      >> Sorry![/color]
      >
      >There are test groups for this kind of garbage.[/color]
      =============== =============== =============== ==
      A little more courtesy and proper language would be in order!
      There are enough jerks in this world ...

      Comment

      • Randy Webb

        #4
        Re: Just testing ... Sorry!

        Byrg B. wrote:
        [color=blue]
        > On 24 Sep 2004 08:38:59 GMT, John Bokma <postmaster@cas tleamber.com>
        > wrote:
        >
        >[color=green]
        >>wildblue_111@ hotmail.com (ByrgB) wrote in news:a6e8b14d.0 409231727.d47c8 b4
        >>@posting.goog le.com:
        >>
        >>[color=darkred]
        >>>I needed to test that my setup is OK.
        >>>Sorry![/color]
        >>
        >>There are test groups for this kind of garbage.[/color]
        >
        > =============== =============== =============== ==
        > A little more courtesy and proper language would be in order!
        > There are enough jerks in this world ...[/color]

        Would you prefer we coddle you like a 6 year old that doesn't know any
        better? I hope not, as its not going to happen.


        --
        Randy
        comp.lang.javas cript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq

        Comment

        • Byrg B.

          #5
          Re: Just testing ... Sorry!

          On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:36:32 -0400, Randy Webb
          <HikksNotAtHome @aol.com> wrote:
          [color=blue]
          >Byrg B. wrote:
          >[color=green]
          >> On 24 Sep 2004 08:38:59 GMT, John Bokma <postmaster@cas tleamber.com>
          >> wrote:
          >>
          >>[color=darkred]
          >>>wildblue_111 @hotmail.com (ByrgB) wrote in news:a6e8b14d.0 409231727.d47c8 b4
          >>>@posting.goo gle.com:
          >>>
          >>>
          >>>>I needed to test that my setup is OK.
          >>>>Sorry!
          >>>
          >>>There are test groups for this kind of garbage.[/color]
          >>
          >> =============== =============== =============== ==
          >> A little more courtesy and proper language would be in order!
          >> There are enough jerks in this world ...[/color]
          >
          >Would you prefer we coddle you like a 6 year old that doesn't know any
          >better? I hope not, as its not going to happen.[/color]
          =============== =============== =============== =====
          No! Just ordinary courtesy will do ,,.

          Comment

          • Dr John Stockton

            #6
            Re: Just testing ... Sorry!

            JRS: In article <a6e8b14d.04092 31727.d47c8b4@p osting.google.c om>, dated
            Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:27:18, seen in news:comp.lang. javascript, ByrgB
            <wildblue_111@h otmail.com> posted :[color=blue]
            >I needed to test that my setup is OK.[/color]

            Read FAQ, 2,3, para 5.

            Moreover, there is no need to test.

            If you have anything worth saying, write it briefly and post it, and see
            if it appears. It is better for you to risk losing that effort than it
            is to send that message to every Usenet server in the world, and to most
            of those who read this newsgroup off-line, and to have copies of it
            archived in perpetuity.

            --
            © John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon. co.uk Turnpike v4.00 IE 4 ©
            <URL:http://www.jibbering.c om/faq/> JL/RC: FAQ of news:comp.lang. javascript
            <URL:http://www.merlyn.demo n.co.uk/js-index.htm> jscr maths, dates, sources.
            <URL:http://www.merlyn.demo n.co.uk/> TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.

            Comment

            • John Bokma

              #7
              Re: Just testing ... Sorry!

              Byrg B. <ByrgB@@@millke rn.com> wrote in
              news:v3h8l09os3 atuanahvp8ufkh4 iljg382f7@4ax.c om:
              [color=blue]
              > On 24 Sep 2004 08:38:59 GMT, John Bokma <postmaster@cas tleamber.com>
              > wrote:
              >[color=green]
              >>wildblue_111@ hotmail.com (ByrgB) wrote in
              >>news:a6e8b14d .0409231727.d47 c8b4 @posting.google .com:
              >>[color=darkred]
              >>> I needed to test that my setup is OK.
              >>> Sorry![/color]
              >>
              >>There are test groups for this kind of garbage.[/color]
              > =============== =============== =============== ==
              > A little more courtesy and proper language would be in order!
              > There are enough jerks in this world ...[/color]

              Yup, and those jerks post test messages. RTFM.

              --
              John MexIT: http://johnbokma.com/mexit/
              personal page: http://johnbokma.com/
              Experienced programmer available: http://castleamber.com/
              Happy Customers: http://castleamber.com/testimonials.html

              Comment

              • Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

                #8
                Re: Just testing ... Sorry!

                Byrg B. wrote:
                [color=blue]
                > [...] John Bokma <postmaster@cas tleamber.com> [...] wrote:[color=green]
                >> [...] ByrgB [...] wrote [...]:[color=darkred]
                >>> I needed to test that my setup is OK.
                >>> Sorry![/color]
                >>
                >> There are test groups for this kind of garbage.[/color]
                > =============== =============== =============== ==
                > A little more courtesy and proper language would be in order![/color]

                Yes, why don't you?
                [color=blue]
                > There are enough jerks in this world ...[/color]

                Such as you. FOAD.


                PointedEars
                --
                No Keyboard Detected -- Press Any Key To Continue

                Comment

                • Dr John Stockton

                  #9
                  Re: Just testing ... Sorry!

                  JRS: In article <2465038.S8rQmq diof@PointedEar s.de>, dated Sun, 10 Oct
                  2004 14:43:11, seen in news:comp.lang. javascript, Thomas 'PointedEars'
                  Lahn <PointedEars@we b.de> posted :[color=blue]
                  >Byrg B. wrote:
                  >[color=green]
                  >> [...] John Bokma <postmaster@cas tleamber.com> [...] wrote:[color=darkred]
                  >>> [...] ByrgB [...] wrote [...]:
                  >>>> I needed to test that my setup is OK.
                  >>>> Sorry!
                  >>>
                  >>> There are test groups for this kind of garbage.[/color]
                  >> =============== =============== =============== ==
                  >> A little more courtesy and proper language would be in order![/color]
                  >
                  >Yes, why don't you?
                  >[color=green]
                  >> There are enough jerks in this world ...[/color]
                  >
                  >Such as you. FOAD.[/color]

                  Those who, on 10 Oct, respond (pointlessly) to an article dated 24 Sep
                  in a thread that otherwise was active only for a single nominal date,
                  and do so without having the good manners to indicate the situation in a
                  properly informative Usefor WIP-compliant attribution thoroughly deserve
                  the worst of their own epithets.

                  Regular readers of this group, Thomas Lahn apart, are well aware that
                  * No applicable standard restricts attributions to Lahnic preference;
                  * Usefor WIP calls for minimum attribution filler than Lahnic, and
                  considers a complete attribution, as above, fully acceptable.

                  --
                  © John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon. co.uk Turnpike v4.00 IE 4 ©
                  <URL:http://www.jibbering.c om/faq/> JL/RC: FAQ of news:comp.lang. javascript
                  <URL:http://www.merlyn.demo n.co.uk/js-index.htm> jscr maths, dates, sources.
                  <URL:http://www.merlyn.demo n.co.uk/> TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.

                  Comment

                  Working...