Javascript standards...

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ivan Marsh

    #16
    Re: Javascript standards...

    On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:54:09 +0000, Grant Wagner wrote:
    [color=blue]
    > You seem to be arguing that JScript implementations aren't ECMAScript
    > compliant when what you seem to mean is that the user agent DOM isn't
    > W3C compliant. Once you figure out what the point you're trying to make
    > is, get back to me.[/color]

    My point is exactly what my OP said:

    Micro$oft "embraced and enhanced" javascript which is why there is more
    than one "standard".

    --
    i.m.
    The USA Patriot Act is the most unpatriotic act in American history.

    Comment

    • Matt Kruse

      #17
      Re: Javascript standards...

      Ivan Marsh wrote:[color=blue]
      > Micro$oft "embraced and enhanced" javascript which is why there is
      > more than one "standard".[/color]

      Netscape "embraced and enhanced" java(live)scrip t itself between early
      versions of it's first browser.

      Since there was no standard, and Microsoft had to write their own version of
      java(live)scrip t from scratch anyway, how could anyone expect it to be
      exactly the same as Netscape's version? Why would it?

      Just because Netscape was first, that makes their version the 'standard'
      forever?

      --
      Matt Kruse
      Javascript Toolbox: http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/


      Comment

      • Ivan Marsh

        #18
        Re: Javascript standards...

        On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:06:42 -0500, Matt Kruse wrote:
        [color=blue]
        > Ivan Marsh wrote:[color=green]
        >> Micro$oft "embraced and enhanced" javascript which is why there is more
        >> than one "standard".[/color]
        >
        > Netscape "embraced and enhanced" java(live)scrip t itself between early
        > versions of it's first browser.
        >
        > Since there was no standard, and Microsoft had to write their own
        > version of java(live)scrip t from scratch anyway, how could anyone expect
        > it to be exactly the same as Netscape's version? Why would it?
        >
        > Just because Netscape was first, that makes their version the 'standard'
        > forever?[/color]

        If you think the only thing that constitutes a standard is a standard
        certified by a standards board than there is no way were going to agree on
        any of this.

        Netscape published their standard of JavaScript and made it available to
        everyone.

        ....and if you think MS doesn't purposfully write incompatibiliti es into
        their software to squash competition you just haven't been paying
        attention over the last 10 years.

        --
        i.m.
        The USA Patriot Act is the most unpatriotic act in American history.

        Comment

        Working...