Java classes comments

[r035198x]

What do you mean by the Embedded keywords or literals ???

apublics is allowed as an identifier even though it embeds the keyword public and test1 is also allowed as a keyword even though it has the literal 1 in it.

[r035198x]

Inheritance class is finally up. Just keep the comments, questions, analysis and criticisms coming here in this thread.

[hirak1984]

Well fine to see this new discussions on java classes.Really awaiting when it will come upto collection frameworks,stru ts etc.Or did you already covered the topics?

Inheritance class is finally up. Just keep the comments, questions, analysis and criticisms coming here in this thread.

[r035198x]

Well fine to see this new discussions on java classes.Really awaiting when it will come upto collection frameworks,stru ts etc.Or did you already covered the topics?

Not yet. Just those topics in those classes have been covered so far. Struts tutorial wasn't part of the plan but I might include it in the J2EE tutorials that I'm thinking of starting as well.

[hirak1984]

That will be so nice of you,and verrrry helpful for people like me.

Not yet. Just those topics in those classes have been covered so far. Struts tutorial wasn't part of the plan but I might include it in the J2EE tutorials that I'm thinking of starting as well.

[abctech]

Please do start J2EE tutorials too side by side with the ongoing Java tutorials if you get time r0, can't wait to read them !!!

[kirankrishnan]

java classes are pureley object oriented...All help to better application development than aany other languages

[r035198x]

java classes are pureley object oriented...All help to better application development than aany other languages

Not really. Just having a class in your program does not mean that your code is object oriented. That is why Java is not purely object-oriented because you can write code that is not object oreinted with it.

[abctech]

java classes are pureley object oriented...All help to better application development than aany other languages

Java isn't purely an OO language because it has basic(primitive ) types that are not objects,.. a trade off of purity for practicality.

[r035198x]

Java isn't purely an OO language because it has basic(primitive ) types that are not objects,.. a trade off of purity for practicality.

True.

If you have a language in which evrything is an object, the language would become purely Object-Based not Object-Oriented.

[abctech]

True.

If you have a language in which evrything is an object, the language would become purely Object-Based not Object-Oriented.

I am a bit confused between purely Object-Based and purely OO languages. Can you elaborate please?

Is VB an Object Based language? Do we have any example of a purely OO language?

[r035198x]

I am a bit confused between purely Object-Based and purely OO languages. Can you elaborate please?

Is VB an Object Based language? Do we have any example of a purely OO language?

A purely object oriented laguage would not only support object oriented design. It would have to have some level of enforcing object oriented design concepts. I don't know whether VB is object based or not but if everything is an object then the language is object based. Smalltalk is an example of a purely object-oriented language.
Here is an article talking about these things.

[abctech]

A purely object oriented laguage would not only support object oriented design. It would have to have some level of enforcing object oriented design concepts. I don't know whether VB is object based or not but if everything is an object then the language is object based. Smalltalk is an example of a purely object-oriented language.
Here is an article talking about these things.

Thanks for the link r035198x. Here's another link I just came across related to this.

[shy001]

Post comments and questions on the java classes in this thread.

hi i need help with something
i have
public class Name implements NameInterface
{
......
}
getting this error

C:\Program Files\Xinox Software\JCreat or\MyProjects\T est1\Name.java: 1: Name should be declared abstract; it does not define setName(java.la ng.String,java. lang.String) in Name
class Name implements Comparable, NameInterface
^
1 error
Process completed.

[r035198x]

hi i need help with something
i have
public class Name implements NameInterface
{
......
}
getting this error

C:\Program Files\Xinox Software\JCreat or\MyProjects\T est1\Name.java: 1: Name should be declared abstract; it does not define setName(java.la ng.String,java. lang.String) in Name
class Name implements Comparable, NameInterface
^
1 error
Process completed.

Start a new thread for this. This thread is reserved for comments to Free Java Classes thread only.