Static Initialiser, . class and Retroguard

[Gavin Andrews]

I use log4j for logging and tend to include the following snipet in
all my classes...

public class MyClass {

// Logging Declarations
private static String _className;
private static Category _cat;

static {
_className = MyClass.class.g etName();
_cat = Category.getIns tance(_classNam e);
}

............

}

this works fine until you start to investigate obfuscation and in
particular RetroGuard; Retroguard correctly changes MyClass to be
some funny name but when the code executes the static initialiser
fails with ClassNotFoundEx ception since MyClass.class.g etName is not
myFunnyName.cla ss.getName

What I really want is a way in a static intialiser to get .class but I
don't have a this so can't do a this.class. Any ideas?

I have a horrible hack... create a funny Constructor and create an
instance using the funny Constructor;the n discard the instance.

e.g.


public class MyClass {

// Logging Declarations
private static String _className;
private static Category _cat;

static {
_className = new MyClass(_cat).c lass.getName();
_cat = Category.getIns tance(_classNam e);
}

private MyClass(Categor y c) {}

............

}

but I don't like it...

So the big question is... How do I get .class in a static context?

Thanks,
Gavin

[Silvio Bierman]

Re: Static Initialiser, . class and Retroguard

This is a common problem with obfuscators that change class names. Javac
changes ClassName.class with Class.forname(" ClassName") during compilation.
Retroguard will change the name of ClassName to something cryptic, but it
will not modify the string that is passed to class.forName() resulting in
that call failing.

I have suggested the makers to do also modify the String and they agreed
that would be better, but there has not been a new release since.

If it is not to inefficient you could replace 'ClassName.clas s' with 'new
ClassName().get Class()' to be obfuscator-insensitive. This is not an option
in your static initializer I am affraid.

Regards,

Silvio Bierman

[PerfectDayToChaseTornados]

Re: Static Initialiser, . class and Retroguard

"Gavin Andrews" <loagw@yahoo.co m> wrote in message
news:4a54b1c1.0 310100531.2eaa6 8f1@posting.goo gle.com...
| I use log4j for logging and tend to include the following snipet in
| all my classes...
|
| public class MyClass {
|
| // Logging Declarations
| private static String _className;
| private static Category _cat;
|
| static {
| _className = MyClass.class.g etName();
| _cat = Category.getIns tance(_classNam e);
| }
|
| ............
|
| }
|
| this works fine until you start to investigate obfuscation and in
| particular RetroGuard; Retroguard correctly changes MyClass to be
| some funny name but when the code executes the static initialiser
| fails with ClassNotFoundEx ception since MyClass.class.g etName is not
| myFunnyName.cla ss.getName
|
| What I really want is a way in a static intialiser to get .class but I
| don't have a this so can't do a this.class. Any ideas?
|
| I have a horrible hack... create a funny Constructor and create an
| instance using the funny Constructor;the n discard the instance.
|
| e.g.
|
|
| public class MyClass {
|
| // Logging Declarations
| private static String _className;
| private static Category _cat;
|
| static {
| _className = new MyClass(_cat).c lass.getName();
| _cat = Category.getIns tance(_classNam e);
| }
|
| private MyClass(Categor y c) {}
|
| ............
|
| }
|
| but I don't like it...
|
| So the big question is... How do I get .class in a static context?
|
| Thanks,
| Gavin

You could use Logger.getRootL ogger() if you do not need to log to specific
files for particular classes.


--
-P
"Sometimes I feel so goddam' trapped by everything that I know"

[Raymond DeCampo]

Re: Static Initialiser, . class and Retroguard

Gavin Andrews wrote:[color=blue]
> I use log4j for logging and tend to include the following snipet in
> all my classes...
>
> public class MyClass {
>
> // Logging Declarations
> private static String _className;
> private static Category _cat;
>
> static {
> _className = MyClass.class.g etName();
> _cat = Category.getIns tance(_classNam e);
> }
>
> ............
>
> }
>
> this works fine until you start to investigate obfuscation and in
> particular RetroGuard; Retroguard correctly changes MyClass to be
> some funny name but when the code executes the static initialiser
> fails with ClassNotFoundEx ception since MyClass.class.g etName is not
> myFunnyName.cla ss.getName
>
> What I really want is a way in a static intialiser to get .class but I
> don't have a this so can't do a this.class. Any ideas?
>
> I have a horrible hack... create a funny Constructor and create an
> instance using the funny Constructor;the n discard the instance.
>
> e.g.
>
>
> public class MyClass {
>
> // Logging Declarations
> private static String _className;
> private static Category _cat;
>
> static {
> _className = new MyClass(_cat).c lass.getName();
> _cat = Category.getIns tance(_classNam e);
> }
>
> private MyClass(Categor y c) {}
>
> ............
>
> }
>
> but I don't like it...
>
> So the big question is... How do I get .class in a static context?
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin[/color]

Well, not to answer your question but maybe to solve your problem, why
don't you just put the classname in yourself? It's a little more
maintainence and error-prone, but it would work:

public class MyClass
{
private static final Logger log =
Logger.getLogge r("com.myCompan y.MyClass");
}

There's nothing magic in log4j about using the class reference to pass
the name, it just wants a string.

Ray

[Gavin Andrews]

Re: Static Initialiser, . class and Retroguard

Thanks for the feedback.
[color=blue][color=green]
>> Javac changes ClassName.class with Class.forname(" ClassName")[/color][/color]
during compilation.

Aha! That explains the behaviour. I didn't realise that's why the
literal was appearing.
[color=blue]
> There's nothing magic in log4j about using the class reference to pass
> the name, it just wants a string.[/color]

Using the literal myself is a possibility. I was just hoping not to
use a literal if i could help it to aid maintainability (given I'm
constantly renaming my classes).

Regards,
Gavin