Suggestions for the DB2 Information Center

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jean-Marc Blaise

    Suggestions for the DB2 Information Center

    Hi,

    I was just searching for the string "internal L lock" in the DB2 Information
    Center. I got a bunch of stuff found and :

    1) It would be nice to have a total count of answers, so that I could
    eventually choose to redo a better search.

    2) Obviously, the fact to enclose with "" does not guaranty the total string
    only is searched. Why does it differ from a search on the IBM support web
    site ? I am looking for the total string, not all pages containing
    "internal" or "L" or "lock".

    Regards,

    Jean-Marc


  • PM \(pm3iinc-nospam\)

    #2
    Re: Suggestions for the DB2 Information Center

    As a work around,
    db2 doc using the eclipse interface

    See advanced search.
    You can use double quotes there.

    One thing though is that if you search for
    "x lock"
    you'll get hits for things like
    x_lock_escals

    .... if you get to the page and search for "x lock" you won't find it. (doh!)
    Sounds like underscore is a 'whitespace'.
    I guess other chars could also be considered as such...

    PM

    "Jean-Marc Blaise" <nobody@nowhere .com> a écrit dans le message de
    news:br7v5m$mc$ 1@news-reader2.wanadoo .fr...[color=blue]
    > Hi,
    >
    > I was just searching for the string "internal L lock" in the DB2[/color]
    Information[color=blue]
    > Center. I got a bunch of stuff found and :
    >
    > 1) It would be nice to have a total count of answers, so that I could
    > eventually choose to redo a better search.
    >
    > 2) Obviously, the fact to enclose with "" does not guaranty the total[/color]
    string[color=blue]
    > only is searched. Why does it differ from a search on the IBM support web
    > site ? I am looking for the total string, not all pages containing
    > "internal" or "L" or "lock".
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Jean-Marc
    >
    >[/color]


    Comment

    Working...