the 'standard' is so strange

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Joachim Schmitz

    #16
    Re: the 'standard' is so strange

    Dik T. Winter wrote:
    In article <gfujkr$j36$1@n ews.xmission.co m>
    gazelle@shell.x mission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes: ...
    > Bridgit Bardot (in her prime)
    >
    Who is that?
    A typo. Actually three, her firstname is Brigitte


    Comment

    • CBFalconer

      #17
      Re: the 'standard' is so strange

      Joachim Schmitz wrote:
      Dik T. Winter wrote:
      >gazelle@shell.x mission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes:
      >>
      >>Bridgit Bardot (in her prime)
      >>
      >Who is that?
      >
      A typo. Actually three, her firstname is Brigitte
      I think we should offer sympathy to Mr Winter.

      --
      [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
      [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
      Try the download section.

      Comment

      • Joachim Schmitz

        #18
        Re: the 'standard' is so strange

        CBFalconer wrote:
        Joachim Schmitz wrote:
        >Dik T. Winter wrote:
        >>gazelle@shell.x mission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes:
        >>>
        >>>Bridgit Bardot (in her prime)
        >>>
        >>Who is that?
        >>
        >A typo. Actually three, her firstname is Brigitte
        >
        I think we should offer sympathy to Mr Winter.
        For being to young to have seen BB in her prime? Nah...

        Bye, Jojo


        Comment

        • Nick Keighley

          #19
          Re: the 'standard' is so strange

          On 17 Nov, 22:55, Stephen Sprunk <step...@sprunk .orgwrote:
          Pilcrow wrote:
          On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:18:44 -0800, Keith Thompson <ks...@mib.or g>
          wrote:
          C is indeed less well-defined than most other languages.
          are you sure about this? Might it be that C is better at
          documenting its dark corners?

          I've seen it argued[1] that the Ada standard has more open issues than
          the C standard (this was some time ago so the holes may have been
          plugged now).

          [1] I can't remember exactly where something like "secure C"
          by Hatton (I couldn't find it by google). Ah! Wikipedia for "Hatton".
          "Safer C" by Les Hatton

          [beware: link is broken]

          > The reason is
          that C evolved and branched on its own long before the standards bodies
          got their hands on it, and different implementors had wildly different
          ideas about what different things meant.  As a result, ANSI (and thus
          ISO) was reduced to trying to document the areas where most or all of
          them agreed and leaving the areas of disagreement undefined.
          >
          Also, C was always intended to be as efficient as possible, and what
          behavior is most efficient on different systems varies.  Finally, one of
          C's greatest strengths is the ability to write both portable code (such
          as cross-platform applications) and unportable code (such as device
          drivers) in the same language; the way this is done is by allowing
          "undefined" and "implementa tion-defined" behavior, which can be avoided
          by anyone trying to write portable code but embraced by those who don't
          care about portability.
          <snip>

          --
          Nick Keighley

          "The Dinosaurs have come and gone,
          we Theriodonts remain"

          Comment

          • Dik T. Winter

            #20
            Re: the 'standard' is so strange

            In article <gg0hdu$sp$1@on line.de"Joachim Schmitz" <jojo@schmitz-digital.dewrite s:
            CBFalconer wrote:
            Joachim Schmitz wrote:
            Dik T. Winter wrote:
            >gazelle@shell.x mission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes:
            >>
            >>Bridgit Bardot (in her prime)
            >>
            >Who is that?
            >
            A typo. Actually three, her firstname is Brigitte
            I think we should offer sympathy to Mr Winter.
            >
            For being to young to have seen BB in her prime? Nah...
            Tsk. At least she was refreshing after DD. But since her retirement some
            35 years ago she has become politically involved, although not exactly correct.
            --
            dik t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
            home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/

            Comment

            • Joachim Schmitz

              #21
              Re: the 'standard' is so strange

              Dik T. Winter wrote:
              In article <gg0hdu$sp$1@on line.de"Joachim Schmitz"
              <jojo@schmitz-digital.dewrite s:
              >CBFalconer wrote:
              >>Joachim Schmitz wrote:
              >>>Dik T. Winter wrote:
              >>>>gazelle@shell.x mission.com (Kenny McCormack) writes:
              >>>>>
              >>>>>Bridgit Bardot (in her prime)
              >>>>>
              >>>>Who is that?
              >>>>
              >>>A typo. Actually three, her firstname is Brigitte
              >>>
              >>I think we should offer sympathy to Mr Winter.
              >>
              >For being to young to have seen BB in her prime? Nah...
              >
              Tsk. At least she was refreshing after DD.
              Yes, I'm old enough to decipher that 8-))
              But since her retirement
              some 35 years ago she has become politically involved, although not
              exactly correct.
              Partly true indeed... (her fight against seal hunting was OK, IMHO)

              Bye, Jojo


              Comment

              Working...