Re: Template technicality - What does the standard say?
Stephen Horne wrote:
Of course if you tried it without benefit I can't argue with that.
But I do think that "intact" is too strong a constraint -- it's not a
one-way street, and neither is acute "firefighti ng" the main point of
practice.
But let's not dwell off topic, I mainly just thought someone might
know that company.
No. My friend's still digging, though.
Martin
--
Liberty: One of Imagination's most precious possessions.
--Ambrose Bierce
Stephen Horne wrote:
Those techniques depend on the link back from the prefrontal
cortex to the amygdala being intact - the link that switches off
unnecessary stress reactions.
cortex to the amygdala being intact - the link that switches off
unnecessary stress reactions.
The point is that stress control techniques only work if I'm not
really all that stressed anyway.
really all that stressed anyway.
But I do think that "intact" is too strong a constraint -- it's not a
one-way street, and neither is acute "firefighti ng" the main point of
practice.
But let's not dwell off topic, I mainly just thought someone might
know that company.
Wouldn't they want people who can speak Swedish?
Martin
--
Liberty: One of Imagination's most precious possessions.
--Ambrose Bierce
Comment