Re: Templated friend classes

[Ralf Goertz]

Victor Bazarov wrote:

I would hope that the syntax
>
template<class Tclass Derived1: public Base<T>
{
...
template<friend class Derived2<T>;
};
>
or
>
template<class Tclass Derived1: public Base<T>
{
...
template friend class Derived2<T>;
};
>
would work, but IIRC they don't.

Yes, you're right, they don't. At least not with my compiler. Is there a
reason for this? I also tried to use a forward declaration of Derived2
before the definition of Derived1 but obviously, those declaration
aren't allowed for templated classes, either. Again, I don't see why. If
a non-templated class is used in a forward definition, the compiler also
doesn't know what types are in that class.

Ralf

[Ralf Goertz]

Re: Templated friend classes

Ralf Goertz wrote:

I also tried to use a forward declaration of Derived2 before the
definition of Derived1 but obviously, those declaration aren't allowed
for templated classes, either.

That's nonsense. I didn't do it right (I added the ": public Base<T>"
part to the forwarding declaration). Sorry for the noise.

Ralf