C++ Standards

**Pete Becker** · Jul 23 '08, 10:15 AM

Re: C++ Standards

On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, rkldabs@gmail.c om said:

>
As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URL http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
correct?

Yes.

I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.
>

They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
track of what's what.

--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

**puzzlecracker** · Jul 23 '08, 06:05 PM

Re: C++ Standards

On Jul 23, 6:05 am, Pete Becker <p...@versatile coding.comwrote :

On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, rkld...@gmail.c om said:
>
>
>

As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
correct?

>
Yes.
>

I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

>
They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
track of what's what.
>
--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
consideration.

Thanks

**Pete Becker** · Jul 23 '08, 07:05 PM

Re: C++ Standards

On 2008-07-23 14:02:28 -0400, puzzlecracker <ironsel2000@gm ail.comsaid:

On Jul 23, 6:05Â am, Pete Becker <p...@versatile coding.comwrote :

>On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, rkld...@gmail.c om said:
>>
>>
>>

>>As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
>>by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22

/wg21/

>>indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
>>correct?

>>
>Yes.
>>

>>Â I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

>>
>They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
>track of what's what.
>>
>--
>Â Pete
>Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
>Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
>(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

>
Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
consideration.
>

The latest draft standard is N2691.

--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

**Ian Collins** · Jul 23 '08, 07:15 PM

Re: C++ Standards

puzzlecracker wrote:

On Jul 23, 6:05 am, Pete Becker <p...@versatile coding.comwrote :

>On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, rkld...@gmail.c om said:
>>
>>
>>

>>As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
>>by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
>>indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
>>correct?

>Yes.
>>

>> I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

>They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
>track of what's what.
>>

*Please* don't quote signatures.

>
Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
consideration.
>

You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
published document. For now, check the draft.

--
Ian Collins.

**Johannes Bauer** · Jul 23 '08, 10:15 PM

Re: C++ Standards

Ian Collins schrieb:

You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
published document. For now, check the draft.

Wasn't that "Tardis"? And wouldn't a Delorean do as well?

Regards,
Johannes

--
"Wer etwas kritisiert muss es noch lange nicht selber besser können. Es
reicht zu wissen, daß andere es besser können und andere es auch
besser machen um einen Vergleich zu bringen." - Wolfgang Gerber
in de.sci.electron ics <47fa8447$0$115 45$9b622d9e@new s.freenet.de>

**puzzlecracker** · Jul 23 '08, 11:05 PM

Re: C++ Standards

On Jul 23, 3:02 pm, Pete Becker <p...@versatile coding.comwrote :

On 2008-07-23 14:02:28 -0400, puzzlecracker <ironsel2...@gm ail.comsaid:
>
>
>

On Jul 23, 6:05 am, Pete Becker <p...@versatile coding.comwrote :

On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, rkld...@gmail.c om said:

>

>As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
>by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22

/wg21/

>indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
>correct?

>

Yes.

>

> I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

>

They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
track of what's what.

>

--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

>

Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
consideration.

>
The latest draft standard is N2691.
>
--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

link please

**Pete Becker** · Jul 23 '08, 11:55 PM

Re: C++ Standards

On 2008-07-23 18:56:11 -0400, puzzlecracker <ironsel2000@gm ail.comsaid:

On Jul 23, 3:02Â pm, Pete Becker <p...@versatile coding.comwrote :

>On 2008-07-23 14:02:28 -0400, puzzlecracker <ironsel2...@gm ail.comsaid:
>>
>>
>>

>>On Jul 23, 6:05Â am, Pete Becker <p...@versatile coding.comwrote :
>>>On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, rkld...@gmail.c om said:

>>

>>>>As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
>>>>by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc

22

>>/wg21/
>>>>indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understandin

g

>>>>correct?

>>

>>>Yes.

>>

>>>>Â I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

>>

>>>They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
>>>track of what's what.

>>
>>

>>Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
>>of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
>>consideration .

>>
>The latest draft standard is N2691.
>>

>
link please

Just like the answer to your previous question, it's in the text that
you quoted.

--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

**Ian Collins** · Jul 24 '08, 05:35 AM

Re: C++ Standards

Johannes Bauer wrote:

Ian Collins schrieb:
>

>You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
>published document. For now, check the draft.

>
Wasn't that "Tardis"? And wouldn't a Delorean do as well?
>

:)

--
Ian Collins.

C++ Standards

C++ Standards

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment