Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for windows that
can be run from the commmand line?
can be run from the commmand line?
-
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
rufus wrote:All of them can be run from the command lineIs there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for windows that
can be run from the commmand line?
>
>
o MSVC. In your installation tab there is a visual studio
tools item. Open it and choose the command line option. That
will open a command shell with all the necesary environment variables
alraedy set.
o mingw. Install it, add the binaries directory to your path, then
just use it with "gcc options"
o Pelles C: Just install it, go to the installation directory and
use the .bat that sets the environment variables
o lcc-win. Just add \lcc\bin to your path and compile with
lc <arguments>
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
rufus said:
Yes. Borland C (and its little brother Turbo C), Microsoft C, Pacific C,Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for windows that
can be run from the commmand line?
gcc, Digital Mars C, Pelles C (and no doubt plenty more) can all be run
from the command line. Your current C compiler can almost certainly do it.
Check the documentation.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk >
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
rufus wrote:
As far as I know all compilers that come with IDEs can also be run fromIs there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for windows
that can be run from the commmand line?
the command line. This includes MSVC, Intel, gcc, Borland, lcc-win,
PellesC etc. Your compiler's documentation will tell you what the
actual command is to invoke the command line compiler and bypass all
the IDE stuff.
But just to get you up and running here are the names of executables
that you need to invoke for compiling from the command line.
MSVC - cl.exe
gcc - gcc (gcc.exe on Windows)
Borland - bcc.exe (and tcc.exe for their "Turbo C" branded products)
lcc-win32 - lcc.exe
Intel - icc (or icc.exe)
But there is no substitute for reading the documentation that comes with
your compiler and Standard library.
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrites:
You forgot to mention lcc-win. Available free for home use.rufus said:
>>>Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for windows that
>can be run from the commmand line?
Yes. Borland C (and its little brother Turbo C), Microsoft C, Pacific C,
gcc, Digital Mars C, Pelles C (and no doubt plenty more) can all be run
from the command line. Your current C compiler can almost certainly do it.
Check the documentation.
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
Richard wrote:Yeah, bad memory this heathfield...Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrites:
>>>rufus said:
>>>Yes. Borland C (and its little brother Turbo C), Microsoft C, Pacific C,>>Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for windows that
>>can be run from the commmand line?
>gcc, Digital Mars C, Pelles C (and no doubt plenty more) can all be run
>from the command line. Your current C compiler can almost certainly do it.
>Check the documentation.
You forgot to mention lcc-win. Available free for home use.
>
Thanks for remind him of lcc-win
:-)
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
jacob navia wrote:As long as lcc-win doesn't fully conform to either the C89- or C99-Standard,Richard wrote:>>Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrites:
>>>>>>rufus said:
>>>
>>>Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for
>>>windows that can be run from the commmand line?
>>Yes. Borland C (and its little brother Turbo C), Microsoft C,
>>Pacific C, gcc, Digital Mars C, Pelles C (and no doubt plenty more)
>>can all be run from the command line. Your current C compiler can
>>almost certainly do it. Check the documentation.
>You forgot to mention lcc-win. Available free for home use.
>>
Yeah, bad memory this heathfield...
he doesn't regard it a C-compiler, or did that slip your memory? ;-)
Bye, Jojo
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
jacob navia said:
The troll is mistaken (as usual), and so are you (as usual). I didn'tRichard wrote:>>Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrites:
>>>>>>rufus said:
>>>
>>>Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for windows
>>>that can be run from the commmand line?
>>Yes. Borland C (and its little brother Turbo C), Microsoft C, Pacific
>>C, gcc, Digital Mars C, Pelles C (and no doubt plenty more) can all be
>>run from the command line. Your current C compiler can almost certainly
>>do it. Check the documentation.
>You forgot to mention lcc-win. Available free for home use.
>>
Yeah, bad memory this heathfield...
"forget" to mention lcc-win. The OP asked for command-line-driven C
compilers. As far as I'm aware, lcc-win doesn't claim conformance to
either C90 or C99, so how can it be called a C compiler?
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk >
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
Joachim Schmitz wrote:Bravo!jacob navia wrote:>>Richard wrote:>Yeah, bad memory this heathfield...>>Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrites:
>>>
>>>rufus said:
>>>>
>>>>Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for
>>>>windows that can be run from the commmand line?
>>>Yes. Borland C (and its little brother Turbo C), Microsoft C,
>>>Pacific C, gcc, Digital Mars C, Pelles C (and no doubt plenty more)
>>>can all be run from the command line. Your current C compiler can
>>>almost certainly do it. Check the documentation.
>>You forgot to mention lcc-win. Available free for home use.
>>>
As long as lcc-win doesn't fully conform to either the C89- or C99-Standard,
he doesn't regard it a C-compiler, or did that slip your memory? ;-)
>
I think you have earned some points here. Soon you will be a
member of the regulars clique!
Just keep the good work
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
Richard Heathfield wrote:You are lying, as always.jacob navia said:
>>>Richard wrote:>Yeah, bad memory this heathfield...>>Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrites:
>>>
>>>rufus said:
>>>>
>>>>Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for windows
>>>>that can be run from the commmand line?
>>>Yes. Borland C (and its little brother Turbo C), Microsoft C, Pacific
>>>C, gcc, Digital Mars C, Pelles C (and no doubt plenty more) can all be
>>>run from the command line. Your current C compiler can almost certainly
>>>do it. Check the documentation.
>>You forgot to mention lcc-win. Available free for home use.
>>>
The troll is mistaken (as usual), and so are you (as usual). I didn't
"forget" to mention lcc-win. The OP asked for command-line-driven C
compilers. As far as I'm aware, lcc-win doesn't claim conformance to
either C90 or C99, so how can it be called a C compiler?
>
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
jacob navia <jacob@nospam.c omwrites:
Between JoJo and Vippstar it must be hard for Heathfield to chooseJoachim Schmitz wrote:>>jacob navia wrote:>>>>Richard wrote:
>>>Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrites:
>>>>
>>>>rufus said:
>>>>>
>>>>>Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for
>>>>>windows that can be run from the commmand line?
>>>>Yes. Borland C (and its little brother Turbo C), Microsoft C,
>>>>Pacific C, gcc, Digital Mars C, Pelles C (and no doubt plenty more)
>>>>can all be run from the command line. Your current C compiler can
>>>>almost certainly do it. Check the documentation.
>>>You forgot to mention lcc-win. Available free for home use.
>>>>
>>Yeah, bad memory this heathfield...
>As long as lcc-win doesn't fully conform to either the C89- or
>C99-Standard, he doesn't regard it a C-compiler, or did that slip
>your memory? ;-)
>>
Bravo!
>
I think you have earned some points here. Soon you will be a
member of the regulars clique!
>
Just keep the good work
his number one lackey!
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
jacob navia wrote:So win-lcc _is_ claiming conformance to C90 or C99? Which one then? Or evenRichard Heathfield wrote:>>jacob navia said:
>>>>>>Richard wrote:
>>>Richard Heathfield <rjh@see.sig.in validwrites:
>>>>
>>>>rufus said:
>>>>>
>>>>>Is there a C-compiler (and for that matter C++ compiler) for
>>>>>windows that can be run from the commmand line?
>>>>Yes. Borland C (and its little brother Turbo C), Microsoft C,
>>>>Pacific C, gcc, Digital Mars C, Pelles C (and no doubt plenty
>>>>more) can all be run from the command line. Your current C
>>>>compiler can almost certainly do it. Check the documentation.
>>>You forgot to mention lcc-win. Available free for home use.
>>>>
>>Yeah, bad memory this heathfield...
>The troll is mistaken (as usual), and so are you (as usual). I didn't
>"forget" to mention lcc-win. The OP asked for command-line-driven C
>compilers. As far as I'm aware, lcc-win doesn't claim conformance to
>either C90 or C99, so how can it be called a C compiler?
>>
You are lying, as always.
both? Which which switches?
I only remember severel reports here about non-conformance to either
standard, so if you claim win-lcc to be conforming _you_ seem to be lying
here...
Bye, Jojo
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
Joachim Schmitz wrote:C89 is supportedSo win-lcc _is_ claiming conformance to C90 or C99? Which one then? Or even
both? Which which switches?
C99 is supported but there are a few things missing.
What are the problems? Can you specify?I only remember severel reports here about non-conformance to either
standard, so if you claim win-lcc to be conforming _you_ seem to be lying
here...
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
jacob navia wrote:Which switches turn on full C89 conformance?Joachim Schmitz wrote:C89 is supported>So win-lcc _is_ claiming conformance to C90 or C99? Which one then?
>Or even both? Which which switches?
Which switch to turn this on? However, as long as things are missing, it isC99 is supported but there are a few things missing.
not fully C99 conformant. Claiming otherwise would be a lie.
There is no half-way-conformant or nearly-there, that's like "almost
pregnant".
I remember several issues having been mentioned here in CLC, most recently>>I only remember severel reports here about non-conformance to either
>standard, so if you claim win-lcc to be conforming _you_ seem to be
>lying here...
What are the problems? Can you specify?
frand() from one of your standard headers.
I'm too lazy to dig up the other issues now, there were several in the past
few months and you perfectly know about them as you went balistic every
signle time one came up.
Hmm, maybe you can rightfully claim it to be C89 conformant, modulo bugs?
Bye, Jojo
Comment
-
Re: Commandline compiler for windows?
jacob navia wrote:
What is the switch to enforce conformance to C90?Joachim Schmitz wrote:C89 is supported>So win-lcc _is_ claiming conformance to C90 or C99? Which one then?
>Or even both? Which which switches?
<snip>
Comment
Comment