Problem with SYS_mount

**Antoninus Twink** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

On 5 May 2008 at 21:14, Sam Joseph wrote:

I need to mount a loopback file system. I'm using SYS_mount, but it
always fails with ENOTDIR. Am I doing something silly? Here's the
offending line:
>
if(syscall(SYS_ mount,
"/home/sam/mnt/", "/home/sam/myfile.img", "-o loop" ))
perror("Mount failure/ ");

There are so many problems with your code and approach that it's hard to
know where to begin!

First of all, the prototype for the system call is
asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);

So your code has the first two arguments the wrong way round, and the
last two arguments are missing. The third argument is, unfortunately,
much too naive: while the mount(8) command is happy to accept options
like "-o loop", the mount system call isn't.

But you shouldn't be using the mount system call at all! The mount
program does some other fairly complicated work besides executing a
system call, and you'd need to re-do all that by hand. Why bother? Just
run mount(8).

If you really want to work programatically , you can open one of the loop
devices, perform an ioctl on it (request LOOP_SET_FD with extra argument
"/home/sam/myfile.img"), then use mount(2).

**Eric Sosman** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

Antoninus Twink wrote:

On 5 May 2008 at 21:14, Sam Joseph wrote:

>I need to mount a loopback file system. I'm using SYS_mount, but it
>always fails with ENOTDIR. Am I doing something silly? Here's the
>offending line:
>>
>if(syscall(SYS _mount,
> "/home/sam/mnt/", "/home/sam/myfile.img", "-o loop" ))
> perror("Mount failure/ ");

>
There are so many problems with your code and approach that it's hard to
know where to begin!
>
First of all, the prototype for the system call is
asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);
[...]

Drivel. Nonsense. Idiocy.

To the O.P.: Your question is not about the C language,
but about the system interfaces provided by (it seems) some
flavor of Unix or POSIX. The details of how to get that
system to do something and about the necessary preconditions
and failure modes are all specific to the system, not to the
language you address it with. So look for a forum where the
experts on your system hang out, and try asking there.

Here, as you've seen, you're likely to get drivel,
nonsense, and idiocy.

--
Eric.Sosman@sun .com

**Antoninus Twink** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

On 5 May 2008 at 21:47, Eric Sosman wrote:

Antoninus Twink wrote:

>First of all, the prototype for the system call is
>asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
> char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);
>[...]

>
Drivel. Nonsense. Idiocy.

What on earth are you talking about? If (as is very likely) the OP is
using Linux, he can check for himself by examining
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/syscalls.h

**Richard Tobin** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

In article <1210023910.891 654@news1nwk>,
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosman@su n.comwrote:

>First of all, the prototype for the system call is
>asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
> char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);
>[...]

Drivel. Nonsense. Idiocy.

I guess the OP's question concerns Linux, in which case it
would certainly make more sense to ask in a Linux group. But
as far as I can tell, Twink's response was fairly accurate.

-- Richard
--
:wq

**Kenny McCormack** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

In article <1210023910.891 654@news1nwk>,
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosman@su n.comwrote a bunch of Drivel. Nonsense. Idiocy.:
....

Here, as you've seen, you're likely to get drivel,
>nonsense, and idiocy.
>
>--
>Eric.Sosman@su n.com

Straight from the source.

**Ian Collins** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

Richard Tobin wrote:

In article <1210023910.891 654@news1nwk>,
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosman@su n.comwrote:
>

>>First of all, the prototype for the system call is
>>asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
>> char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);
>>[...]

>

> Drivel. Nonsense. Idiocy.

>
I guess the OP's question concerns Linux, in which case it
would certainly make more sense to ask in a Linux group. But
as far as I can tell, Twink's response was fairly accurate.
>

That the problem, isn't it? "as far as I can tell" isn't good enough,
post here you might get one opinion, post in the correct place, you will
get informed answers.

--
Ian Collins.

**Richard Tobin** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

In article <689fpiF2qkckmU 1@mid.individua l.net>,
Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.co mwrote:

>That the problem, isn't it? "as far as I can tell" isn't good enough,
>post here you might get one opinion, post in the correct place, you will
>get informed answers.

There's a better chance of accurate answers (and wrong answers being
corrected) in a Linux group, which is why I said it would make more
sense to ask there.

But I was responding to Eric accusation, not to the original poster.
Eric made his accusation here in comp.lang.c, and I don't see why it
should go unchallenged just because he posted it in this newsgroup.

-- Richard
--
:wq

**Ian Collins** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

Richard Tobin wrote:

In article <689fpiF2qkckmU 1@mid.individua l.net>,
Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.co mwrote:
>

>That the problem, isn't it? "as far as I can tell" isn't good enough,
>post here you might get one opinion, post in the correct place, you will
>get informed answers.

>
There's a better chance of accurate answers (and wrong answers being
corrected) in a Linux group, which is why I said it would make more
sense to ask there.
>
But I was responding to Eric accusation, not to the original poster.
Eric made his accusation here in comp.lang.c, and I don't see why it
should go unchallenged just because he posted it in this newsgroup.
>

Well in standard C (this is c.l.c, right?) terms,

asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);

is Drivel. Nonsense. Idiocy!

--
Ian Collins.

**Richard Tobin** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

In article <689i5pF2qkckmU 4@mid.individua l.net>,
Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.co mwrote:

>Well in standard C (this is c.l.c, right?) terms,
>
>asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);
>
>is Drivel. Nonsense. Idiocy!

C&V please. I can't find any of those terms in my copy of the standard.

-- Richard
--
:wq

**CBFalconer** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

Richard Tobin wrote:

Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosman@su n.comwrote:

>Antoninus Twink wrote:

>

>>First of all, the prototype for the system call is
>>asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
>> char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);
>>[...]

>

> Drivel. Nonsense. Idiocy.

>
I guess the OP's question concerns Linux, in which case it
would certainly make more sense to ask in a Linux group. But
as far as I can tell, Twink's response was fairly accurate.

I have no idea, since Twink is plonked here. However the question,
and thus an answer to it, are all off-topic for c.l.c. They are
probably topical on a group that deals with the OPs system.

Answering off-topic questions is no way to get off plonk lists.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
Try the download section.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

**Richard Tobin** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

In article <481F9897.7C546 AE@yahoo.com>,
CBFalconer <cbfalconer@mai neline.netwrote :

>Answering off-topic questions is no way to get off plonk lists.

I am sure Twink will take note of this and act accordingly.

-- Richard
--
:wq

**jacob navia** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

Eric Sosman wrote:

[drivel snipped]

Here, as you've seen, you're likely to get drivel,
nonsense, and idiocy.
>

You are the best example of that. Your post contains only that

--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique

403 Forbidden

http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32

**Eligiusz Narutowicz** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.co mwrites:

Richard Tobin wrote:

>In article <1210023910.891 654@news1nwk>,
>Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosman@su n.comwrote:
>>

>>>First of all, the prototype for the system call is
>>>asmlinkage long sys_mount(char __user *dev_name, char __user* dir_name,
>>> char __user *type, unsigned long flags, void __user *data);
>>>[...]

>>

>> Drivel. Nonsense. Idiocy.

>>
>I guess the OP's question concerns Linux, in which case it
>would certainly make more sense to ask in a Linux group. But
>as far as I can tell, Twink's response was fairly accurate.
>>

That the problem, isn't it? "as far as I can tell" isn't good enough,

Who cares if YOU can tell or not?

He got an accurate answer I can be sure to tell you. You do not know?
Then do not comment I think is best.

**Kenny McCormack** · Jun 27 '08, 07:35 PM

Re: Problem with SYS_mount

In article <fvora7$s6l$1@a ioe.org>, jacob navia <jacob@nospam.o rgwrote:

>Eric Sosman wrote:
>
>[drivel snipped]
>

> Here, as you've seen, you're likely to get drivel,
>nonsense, and idiocy.
>>

>
>You are the best example of that. Your post contains only that

Indeed. True of Sosman in general.

It was truly satisfying to see him finally come clean about his posting
style.

Problem with SYS_mount

Problem with SYS_mount

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment