Re: Network modules

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kenny McCormack

    Re: Network modules

    In article <d47d4d70-c76a-4747-a3da-2591efa3842a@a2 3g2000hsc.googl egroups.com>,
    InuY4sha <inuy4sha@gmail .comwrote:
    >Your question isn't about the C language, which is what we discuss
    >here. Assuming the kernel in question is Linux, you should ask in one
    >of the Linux newsgroups (possibly linux.dev.kerne l, but check the
    >newsgroup first; all I know about it is that it exists).
    To the OP: I don't believe-in/support the stuff I am about to write
    (after this introductory paragraph). Rather, I am giving you the
    position held by the loony regulars of this ng, who strongly resemble
    not the scientists that you would expect to find on a Usenet group,
    particularly one of a technical bent, but rather, religious fanatics.
    That (so I am told) many of the reg posters here are, in fact, religious
    nutters in real life, should come as no surprise.
    >I don't agree too much... my question is not about syntax in C, that's
    >true, but it's correlated with C. In any case, the NG linux.dev.kerne l
    >seems to be dead since a long long time ago; What is left to me is a
    >couple of other groups with really few members. This one is probably
    >the best chance for me to get some information..
    As they have pointed out, what you believe or agree doesn't matter a
    whit. They have religious certitude on their side. They are in a
    position to tell you what *is*.

    Note that certitude is the province of religion, not science.

Working...