U++ problem (was: counting words)

[Razii]

Re: U++ problem (was: counting words)

On Thu, 01 May 2008 00:10:43 +0200, "Alf P. Steinbach"
<alfps@start.no wrote:

>If you start forging approved-headers we will at the very least have to report
>you to abuse at your ISP (RoadRunner, your current IP address is 75.87.86.76).

Ah, if I do something like that, I won't be using roadruner. You can
use a server that don't even forward IP address. There are some server
admins who claim posting anonymously is a fundamental right.

>You have been plonked twice by the secretary of the international C++
>standardizatio n committee's library group.

I remember Pete Becker troll real well when I used to post here years
ago. This troll, Pete Becker, posted a java benchmark (off topic,
huh?) and implied that IO in java is 40/50 times slower than C++. He
was wrong, of course.

[Krice]

Re: U++ problem (was: counting words)

On 30 huhti, 23:41, Razii <whatever1...@h otmail.comwrote :

Get a life.

.. :)

You are wasting your time when trying to think which language
is "better" or faster. There is no such thing as better language,
otherwise we would all be using it. You are talking about Java
in C++ group, it's off topic. Besides no one will believe you,
because you are wrong. But then you probably know that and just
want some attention. Don't be so hard on yourself, we all want
same things. We are all connected through astral planes. You
are not alone.

[Krice]

Re: U++ problem (was: counting words)

On 1 touko, 10:56, Razii <jlgh...@hotmai l.comwrote:

If you explain that one, I would leave the group.

No you will not. And I already explained, you just don't
want to listen. You need to improve your understanding.
It's now in the level of an ape or slightly below that.