image processing library

[Mateusz Loskot]

Re: image processing library

mohangupta13@gm ail.com wrote:

can anyone help me where to find the best image
processing library for c++

You may want to look at the Adobe Generic Image Library (GIL).
You can find support for some aspects of image processing in GDAL
library (http://gdal.org/).

Greetings
--
Mateusz Loskot

http://mateusz.loskot.net

[Default User]

Re: image processing library

dave_mikesell@f astmail.fm wrote:

On Mar 21, 8:36 am, Razii <DONTwhatever.. .@hotmail.comwr ote:
>
Fortunately, C++ is available on more platforms than any
other language.

I find that difficult to believe.



Brian

[dave_mikesell@fastmail.fm]

Re: image processing library

On Mar 21, 1:24 pm, "Default User" <defaultuse...@ yahoo.comwrote:

dave_mikes...@f astmail.fm wrote:

On Mar 21, 8:36 am, Razii <DONTwhatever.. .@hotmail.comwr ote:

>

Fortunately, C++ is available on more platforms than any
other language.

>
I find that difficult to believe.

Aside from C, which Mr. Klein pointed out, I'm wondering what other
language is available on more platforms. Gnu C++ is available on
dozens (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html).

[Default User]

Re: image processing library

dave_mikesell@f astmail.fm wrote:

On Mar 21, 1:24 pm, "Default User" <defaultuse...@ yahoo.comwrote:

dave_mikes...@f astmail.fm wrote:

On Mar 21, 8:36 am, Razii <DONTwhatever.. .@hotmail.comwr ote:

Fortunately, C++ is available on more platforms than any
other language.

I find that difficult to believe.

>
Aside from C, which Mr. Klein pointed out,

Yes, I saw.

I'm wondering what other language is available on more platforms.

If you dismiss C, then you are probably right. However, that's a huge
caveat.




Brian

[Razii]

Re: image processing library

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:01:56 +0100, Mateusz Loskot
<see.my@signatu re.netwrote:

>And you have exactly the same situation here.
>*if* there is no JVM, the holy Java is useless.

And if there is no C++ compiler, the holy C++ is useless.

[Razii]

Re: image processing library

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:35:21 -0700 (PDT), dave_mikesell@f astmail.fm
wrote:

>So you need a new type of Java platform for mobile devices?

It's not a "new" platform. It's a subset of Java SE.

>And how
>many different APIs do you have to download (http://java.sun.com/
>javame/reference/apis.jsp#api)? How is that different than
>downloading and using C++ libraries?

There are only three APIs, ME (which is a subset of SE), SE, EE (which
includes everything in SE + a server and libraries for server side
applications).

[dave_mikesell@fastmail.fm]

Re: image processing library

On Mar 21, 4:58 pm, Razii <DONTwhatever.. .@hotmail.comwr ote:

And how
many different APIs do you have to download (http://java.sun.com/
javame/reference/apis.jsp#api)? How is that different than
downloading and using C++ libraries?

>
There are only three APIs, ME (which is a subset of SE), SE, EE (which
includes everything in SE + a server and libraries for server side
applications).

So which of the optional dozen or so libraries do you need for your
micro app?

AFAICT, ME, SE, and EE are three distinct platforms. If someone says
their Java app is portable, I'll ask for which platform?

[Razii]

Re: image processing library

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:19:37 -0700 (PDT), dave_mikesell@f astmail.fm
wrote:

>So which of the optional dozen or so libraries do you need for your
>micro app?
>
>AFAICT, ME, SE, and EE are three distinct platforms. If someone says
>their Java app is portable, I'll ask for which platform?

It's not a new platform. It's a subset of SE. As the computing power
of mobile devices improves, the SE and ME will become one. It's a
subset of SE, not new. If someone is familiar with SE API, he already
knows ME.

[dave_mikesell@fastmail.fm]

Re: image processing library

On Mar 21, 9:28 pm, Razii <DONTwhatever.. .@hotmail.comwr ote:

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:19:37 -0700 (PDT), dave_mikes...@f astmail.fm
wrote:
>

So which of the optional dozen or so libraries do you need for your
micro app?

>

AFAICT, ME, SE, and EE are three distinct platforms. If someone says
their Java app is portable, I'll ask for which platform?

>
It's not a new platform. It's a subset of SE. As the computing power
of mobile devices improves, the SE and ME will become one. It's a
subset of SE, not new. If someone is familiar with SE API, he already
knows ME.

So SE apps are not portable to ME. That was my point. Currently you
have three platforms which are used in various combinations: SE, EE,
ME.

[peter koch]

Re: image processing library

On 21 Mar., 20:12, "Default User" <defaultuse...@ yahoo.comwrote:

dave_mikes...@f astmail.fm wrote:

On Mar 21, 1:24 pm, "Default User" <defaultuse...@ yahoo.comwrote:

dave_mikes...@f astmail.fm wrote:
On Mar 21, 8:36 am, Razii <DONTwhatever.. .@hotmail.comwr ote:

>

Fortunately, C++ is available on more platforms than any
other language.

>

I find that difficult to believe.

>

Aside from C, which Mr. Klein pointed out,

>
Yes, I saw.
>

I'm wondering what other language is available on more platforms.

>
If you dismiss C, then you are probably right. However, that's a huge
caveat.
>
Brian

Surely C is number one. But most platforms that offer C could also
offer C++ via Comeaus C++-to-C compiler.

/Peter

[Jerry Coffin]

Re: image processing library

In article <sko7u3l2nqf4ig 9ni4id90co7hcdg 0d3du@4ax.com>,
jackklein@spamc op.net says...

[ ... ]

You went to far with this statement, it is flatly incorrect. It is C,
not C++, that is the most widely available language. There is a C
compiler for every platform that has a C++ implementation, the one
included in the C++ package, if no others.
>
But there are C compilers for a vast number of platforms, most notably
embedded systems and digital signal processors, that do not have C++
compilers.

This is open to some question as well. Given that Comeau C++ compiles
from C++ input to standard, portable C as its output, you can make a
pretty fair argument that any platform that supports C also supports
C++.

Of course, actually using the Comeau compiler for a purpose like this
requires a license that allows it -- and knowing Greg, he probably does
more than just write a license and tell you to have fun. I'd expect he
does a bit of rewriting to invoke that compiler correctly, and then runs
full regression tests and such before he considers the port complete.
Nonetheless, I think it would probably take an extremely unusual target
back-end compiler for this to be any more than a fairly minor, routine
kind of task.

--
Later,
Jerry.

The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

[Diego Martins]

Re: image processing library

It seems all comp.lang.c++ topics are turning to a troll war. nice job
huh?

should we...
1) go back to the subject (image processing library)
2) keep feeding the troll (unfortunately, he is a greedy troll)
3) stop posting here since it is somewhat off-topic?

I vote 3, although I am curious about a good IP lib for C++ (my
current choice is doing things manually and using OpenCV when the time
is short)

Diego
HP