Re: visual C++ 6
Richard Heathfield wrote:
Apparently VS 98 must have been an unofficial name of VS 6.0 but I am
not sure for this.
Richard Heathfield wrote:
Ioannis Vranos said:
>
<snip>
>
>
Well, there has been. If Wikipedia says otherwise, it's wrong - again.
>
To prove this to your own satisfaction, search Microsoft's site for "Visual
Studio 98" references. There are plenty.
>
<snip>
>
>According to
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microso...ersion_history
>there hasn't been "visual studio 98".
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microso...ersion_history
>there hasn't been "visual studio 98".
Well, there has been. If Wikipedia says otherwise, it's wrong - again.
>
To prove this to your own satisfaction, search Microsoft's site for "Visual
Studio 98" references. There are plenty.
Apparently VS 98 must have been an unofficial name of VS 6.0 but I am
not sure for this.
Comment