Is it possible the following condition to be true under C95?
sizeof(size_t)s izeof(unsigned long)
sizeof(size_t)s izeof(unsigned long)
-
-
Re: size_t
In article <fqa0g9$2mbo$2@ ulysses.noc.ntu a.gr>,
Ioannis Vranos <ivranos@nospam .no.spamfreemai l.grwrote:>Is it possible the following condition to be true under C95?size_t is not required to be one of the standard integral>sizeof(size_t) sizeof(unsigned long)
types, just "an unsigned integral type".
--
"Pray do not take the pains / To set me right. /
In vain my faults ye quote; / I wrote as others wrote /
On Sunium's hight." -- Walter Savage Landor
-
Re: size_t
Ioannis Vranos wrote:I believe no, because size_t is specified to be an integer type,>
Is it possible the following condition to be true under C95?
>
sizeof(size_t)s izeof(unsigned long)
and the only C95 integer types are char, short, int, long, with
possible un/signed attributes.
--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
Try the download section.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Comment
Comment