Turing to C++ Program Problem

[orangemonkey]

Hi guys. I'm practicing for the CCC, a programming competition. I got stuck on a problem, so I copied the problem's answer from turing into C++. When I run my program in C++ though, I get a different answer from the one in turing. I've been spending hours trying to find the difference between the turing answer and my C++ answer, but to no avail. So basically, I'm asking what's the difference between the turing and C++ program?

Correct Answer in Turing

function between (a, b, c : int) : boolean
    result a <= b and b <= c
end between

% this recursively tries every route to the end (7000)
procedure findPath (distance : int)
    if distance = 7000 then
        % made it to the end!
        % One more way to get there
        ways := ways + 1
        put ways
    
    else
        % recursively try all motels that you can get to
        for i : 1 .. size
put i
            if between (minn, motel (i) - distance, maax) then
                findPath (motel (i))
            end if
        end for
    end if
end findPath

My wrong answer in C++.

int truck(int distance)
{if (distance == 7000)
{ pos=pos+1; cout<< pos << "pos"; }
else
for (int i=1;i<=motels.size();i++)
{ 
cout << i;

if(minn <= motels[i] - distance && maxx >= motels[i] - distance)
{truck(motels[i]);}

 }

[Banfa]

What is the type of motels?

Have you forgotten that C/C++ arrays index from 0?

[orangemonkey]

Thanks for the advice!

I think I've found the problem and it's different from what I described here, it's actually a different problem. The 2 codes are exactly the same, but I think Dev C++ Bloodshed has problems with recursion. I tracked the values of recursion for the turing and C++ one, they are the same numbers except the C++ starts getting different values after 20 numbers or so and stops early. I've heard of related problems with recursion where there are too much numbers for the IDE to keep track of, some stack/heap problem or the like. So, the code are exactly the same, and it's not my fault :). I'm going to a new IDE and the problem will be solved.